The Spectral Authoring System is able to keep
round about 300.000 Document Kategories in one
Application.

1.4 Million Screentexts are in use, while still
providing fast access.

The complete Application is Google Standard com-
pliant, without use of mod_rewrite, allowing long
directory pathes.

Its containing the only forum software worldwide
which is completely complying to the google stan-
dard for websites, without leaving holes in its
stucture.

As well there is an ajax driven webmail frontend
comparable to hotmail or yahoo mail included, which
easely can get scaled to keep more than a million
e-mail accounts, in a multidomain environment.

The Blog Module is following the actual blogging
standards, while remaining google compliant as
well as its completely fulltext searchable even
in an multiblog environment.

The shop system is not containing query urls any-
more, without use of mod_rewrite.

It is the best ecommerce and shopping plattform
worldwide.

Its written in PHP5.

1. Who are you?
2. What is this?
3. Why should I care?
4. Don't spam.

Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> The Spectral Authoring System is able to keep
> round about 300.000 Document Kategories in one
> Application.
>
> 1.4 Million Screentexts are in use, while still
> providing fast access.
>
> The complete Application is Google Standard com-
> pliant, without use of mod_rewrite, allowing long
> directory pathes.
>
> Its containing the only forum software worldwide
> which is completely complying to the google stan-
> dard for websites, without leaving holes in its
> stucture.
>
> As well there is an ajax driven webmail frontend
> comparable to hotmail or yahoo mail included, which
> easely can get scaled to keep more than a million
> e-mail accounts, in a multidomain environment.
>
> The Blog Module is following the actual blogging
> standards, while remaining google compliant as
> well as its completely fulltext searchable even
> in an multiblog environment.
>
> The shop system is not containing query urls any-
> more, without use of mod_rewrite.
>
> It is the best ecommerce and shopping plattform
> worldwide.
>
> Its written in PHP5.

Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...

1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
3) Make sure it's in English
4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
especially when it says it's powered by your product!

Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...

* What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
* What the heck are "Screentexts"?
* As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding
URLs. Do you have a reference?
* Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to
do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because
what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you
could well be!
* "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
* "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of
mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
* It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?

-Stut

--
http://stut.net/

Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> The Spectral Authoring System is able to keep
> round about 300.000 Document Kategories in one
> Application.
>
> 1.4 Million Screentexts are in use, while still
> providing fast access.
>
> The complete Application is Google Standard com-
> pliant, without use of mod_rewrite, allowing long
> directory pathes.
>
> Its containing the only forum software worldwide
> which is completely complying to the google stan-
> dard for websites, without leaving holes in its
> stucture.
>
> As well there is an ajax driven webmail frontend
> comparable to hotmail or yahoo mail included, which
> easely can get scaled to keep more than a million
> e-mail accounts, in a multidomain environment.
>
> The Blog Module is following the actual blogging
> standards, while remaining google compliant as
> well as its completely fulltext searchable even
> in an multiblog environment.
>
> The shop system is not containing query urls any-
> more, without use of mod_rewrite.
>
> It is the best ecommerce and shopping plattform
> worldwide.
>
> Its written in PHP5.

On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:39 +0100, Stut wrote:
> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>
> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
> especially when it says it's powered by your product!

I think either the English content version doesn't work, was completely
forgotten about, or was never done. The German content is there though.

Cheers,
Rob.
--
.................................................. ..........
SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com

Leveraging the buying power of the masses!
.................................................. ..........

At 4:39 PM +0100 9/10/07, Stut wrote:
>Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>-snip-
>
>-Stut

-Stut:

<my opinion>
Your time is far too valuable to be wasted on this.
</my opinion>

Cheers,

tedd

--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com

tedd wrote:
> At 4:39 PM +0100 9/10/07, Stut wrote:
>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>> -snip-
>>
>> -Stut
>
> -Stut:
>
> <my opinion>
> Your time is far too valuable to be wasted on this.
> </my opinion>

Unless you want to pay me to do something else I'll be happy spending my
spare time being sarcastic - it's what I do!



-Stut

--
http://stut.net/

hi stut,

thank you for your advices.

- Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
language.

- The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
content links.

But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.

If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
will not find any weakness in my application anymore.

Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
sql are removing useless keywords and so on.

- Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
resting for the viewers on a page.

Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
during the runtime of the application.

I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
for performing psychological operations over the internet.

I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
now a days.

- As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.

- The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
as what ever you could think of.

And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
as a nonquery url, like:

http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html

Done without mod_rewrite.

I hope I answered all your questions.

Best Regards,

Sascha

Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>
> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
> 3) Make sure it's in English
> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
>
> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
>
> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding
> URLs. Do you have a reference?
> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to
> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because
> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you
> could well be!
> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of
> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
>
> -Stut
>

On 9/10/07, Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks
<sascha@braun-networks.com> wrote:

> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
> content links.

Those are indeed SEO friendly, but it by no means is "The Google standard"

> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
> with its capabilities.

That's a fairly big claim, you've compared other application
frameworks? Everything you've been talking about, btw has hinted
towards it being a CMS, not a framework.

> I hope I answered all your questions.

I think the biggest question is why post an announcement without
linking to that which you are announcing. In addition, seeing a
working site (unlike braun-networks.com) using it would probably be a
good idea before drumming up interest.

Also you mention not using mod_rewrite. If you're using Apache and
mod_php, are you using Error Documents? Auto-generating html pages
(or yuck - php pages) ? Methodology is worth more to the technical
than concepts or bragging rights.

Regards,

Gavin

Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> hi stut,
>
> thank you for your advices.

Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still,
since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to
enjoy myself...

> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
> language.

Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave
the text on the page a name, how twee.

> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
> content links.

Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with
are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.

> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.

Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker
and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.

> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
> will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
>
> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
> sql are removing useless keywords and so on.

Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation.
You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a
lot like a CMS and not a framework.

> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
> resting for the viewers on a page.

Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even
slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using
some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous
patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly.

> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
> during the runtime of the application.

Sold!!

> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
> for performing psychological operations over the internet.
>
> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
> now a days.

I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.

> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.

Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is
derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting
primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological
order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for
specific page elements to be present.

> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
> as what ever you could think of.

Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your
website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.

> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
> as a nonquery url, like:
>
> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html

Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.

> Done without mod_rewrite.

Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is
this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be
interested to know which you are using and what you have against
mod_rewrite.

> I hope I answered all your questions.

That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.

> Best Regards,

Yours sarcastically,

-Stut

> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>>
>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
>> 3) Make sure it's in English
>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
>> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
>>
>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
>>
>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding
>> URLs. Do you have a reference?
>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to
>> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because
>> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you
>> could well be!
>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of
>> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
>>
>> -Stut
>>
>

Hahaha.... oh wow.

-Xander

Stut wrote:
> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
>> hi stut,
>>
>> thank you for your advices.
>
> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still,
> since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to
> enjoy myself...
>
>> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
>> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
>> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
>> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
>> language.
>
> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you
> gave the text on the page a name, how twee.
>
>> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
>> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
>> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
>> content links.
>
> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying
> with are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
>
>> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
>> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
>> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
>
> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling
> checker and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
>
>> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
>> will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
>>
>> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
>> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
>> sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
>
> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation.
> You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds
> a lot like a CMS and not a framework.
>
>> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
>> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
>> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
>> resting for the viewers on a page.
>
> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even
> slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm
> using some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by
> numerous patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly.
>
>> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
>> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
>> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
>> during the runtime of the application.
>
> Sold!!
>
>> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
>> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
>> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
>> for performing psychological operations over the internet.
>>
>> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
>> now a days.
>
> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
>
>> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
>> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
>> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
>
> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging
> is derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication
> consisting primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse
> chronological order)". There is no requirement for a particular page
> layout or for specific page elements to be present.
>
>> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
>> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
>> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
>> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
>> as what ever you could think of.
>
> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for
> your website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
>
>> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
>> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
>> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
>> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
>> as a nonquery url, like:
>>
>> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html
>>
>
> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
>
>> Done without mod_rewrite.
>
> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how
> is this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd
> be interested to know which you are using and what you have against
> mod_rewrite.
>
> > I hope I answered all your questions.
>
> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
>
> > Best Regards,
>
> Yours sarcastically,
>
> -Stut
>
>> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
>>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>>>
>>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
>>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
>>> 3) Make sure it's in English
>>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
>>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really
>>> gonna care!
>>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
>>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
>>> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
>>>
>>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
>>>
>>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
>>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
>>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards
>>> regarding URLs. Do you have a reference?
>>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world
>>> to do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it?
>>> Because what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out
>>> there you could well be!
>>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
>>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use
>>> of mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your
>>> URLs?
>>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
>>>
>>> -Stut
>>>
>>
>

I'm still waiting for the URL where I can see the product in action.

Aleksandar Vojnovic wrote:
> Hahaha.... oh wow.
>
> -Xander
>
> Stut wrote:
>> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
>>> hi stut,
>>>
>>> thank you for your advices.
>>
>> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss.
>> Still, since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to
>> continue to enjoy myself...
>>
>>> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
>>> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
>>> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
>>> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
>>> language.
>>
>> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you
>> gave the text on the page a name, how twee.
>>
>>> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
>>> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
>>> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
>>> content links.
>>
>> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
>> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying
>> with are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
>>
>>> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
>>> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
>>> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
>>
>> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling
>> checker and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
>>
>>> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
>>> will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
>>>
>>> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
>>> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
>>> sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
>>
>> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO
>> optimisation. You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed
>> out this sounds a lot like a CMS and not a framework.
>>
>>> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
>>> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
>>> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
>>> resting for the viewers on a page.
>>
>> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not
>> even slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but
>> I'm using some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's
>> covered by numerous patents, so you might not want to shout about it
>> too loudly.
>>
>>> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
>>> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
>>> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
>>> during the runtime of the application.
>>
>> Sold!!
>>
>>> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
>>> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
>>> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
>>> for performing psychological operations over the internet.
>>>
>>> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
>>> now a days.
>>
>> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
>> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
>>
>>> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
>>> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
>>> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
>>
>> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging
>> is derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication
>> consisting primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse
>> chronological order)". There is no requirement for a particular page
>> layout or for specific page elements to be present.
>>
>>> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
>>> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
>>> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
>>> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
>>> as what ever you could think of.
>>
>> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for
>> your website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
>>
>>> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
>>> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
>>> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
>>> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
>>> as a nonquery url, like:
>>>
>>> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html
>>>
>>
>> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
>> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
>>
>>> Done without mod_rewrite.
>>
>> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how
>> is this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but
>> I'd be interested to know which you are using and what you have
>> against mod_rewrite.
>>
>> > I hope I answered all your questions.
>>
>> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
>>
>> > Best Regards,
>>
>> Yours sarcastically,
>>
>> -Stut
>>
>>> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
>>>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>>>>
>>>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
>>>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
>>>> 3) Make sure it's in English
>>>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
>>>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really
>>>> gonna care!
>>>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
>>>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
>>>> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
>>>>
>>>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
>>>>
>>>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
>>>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
>>>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards
>>>> regarding URLs. Do you have a reference?
>>>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide
>>>> world to do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on
>>>> it? Because what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners
>>>> out there you could well be!
>>>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
>>>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without
>>>> use of mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in
>>>> your URLs?
>>>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
>>>>
>>>> -Stut
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


--
With Warm Regards,
Sudheer. S
http://www.binaryvibes.co.in

The pages are all delivered by one single kind of page parser.

Its consisting of round about 5 lines of code. But for different
reasons there have to get written parsers, especially for the
content to show. The longest parser is consisting of 11 lines
of code.

But I don't want to say more, otherwise my invention is not mine
anymore. Me alone as a developer can't react fast enough, to ar-
chive the success, I normaly ought to have, before everybody is
running to archive the same innovations like me.

But as I can see how you are reacting on it, and others as well
everybody is really loves the behavior. Its long time ago that
I spoke with other devs. So I really feel well about the conver-
sation.

Thank you very much.

Best Regards,

Sascha

Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> > hi stut,
> >
> > thank you for your advices.
>
> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still,
> since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to
> enjoy myself...
>
> > - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
> > in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
> > language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
> > re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
> > language.
>
> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave
> the text on the page a name, how twee.
>
> > - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
> > like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
> > are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
> > content links.
>
> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with
> are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
>
> > But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
> > system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
> > for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
>
> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker
> and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
>
> > If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
> > will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
> >
> > Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
> > to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
> > sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
>
> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation.
> You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a
> lot like a CMS and not a framework.
>
> > - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
> > with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
> > which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
> > resting for the viewers on a page.
>
> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even
> slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using
> some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous
> patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly.
>
> > Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
> > of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
> > ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
> > during the runtime of the application.
>
> Sold!!
>
> > I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
> > I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
> > that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
> > for performing psychological operations over the internet.
> >
> > I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
> > now a days.
>
> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
>
> > - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
> > a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
> > as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
>
> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is
> derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting
> primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological
> order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for
> specific page elements to be present.
>
> > - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
> > actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
> > tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
> > dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
> > as what ever you could think of.
>
> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your
> website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
>
> > And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
> > to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
> > of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
> > document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
> > as a nonquery url, like:
> >
> > http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html
>
> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
>
> > Done without mod_rewrite.
>
> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is
> this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be
> interested to know which you are using and what you have against
> mod_rewrite.
>
> > I hope I answered all your questions.
>
> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
>
> > Best Regards,
>
> Yours sarcastically,
>
> -Stut
>
> > Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> >> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
> >>
> >> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
> >> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
> >> 3) Make sure it's in English
> >> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
> >> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
> >> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
> >> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
> >> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
> >>
> >> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
> >>
> >> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
> >> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
> >> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding
> >> URLs. Do you have a reference?
> >> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to
> >> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because
> >> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you
> >> could well be!
> >> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
> >> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of
> >> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
> >> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
> >>
> >> -Stut
> >>
> >
>
>

If you take 30 seconds for the startpage to load, you can check out
http://www.fit-o-matic.com again.

The english translation is not finished yet. But for checking the
behavior you can check out the german page as well.

I gave allready demo user account informtations, it might be best
for checking the application a little.

I will give it to you in a private mail.

Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 14:40 +0530 schrieb Sudheer Satyanarayana:
> I'm still waiting for the URL where I can see the product in action.
>
> Aleksandar Vojnovic wrote:
> > Hahaha.... oh wow.
> >
> > -Xander
> >
> > Stut wrote:
> >> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> >>> hi stut,
> >>>
> >>> thank you for your advices.
> >>
> >> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss.
> >> Still, since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to
> >> continue to enjoy myself...
> >>
> >>> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
> >>> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
> >>> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
> >>> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
> >>> language.
> >>
> >> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you
> >> gave the text on the page a name, how twee.
> >>
> >>> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
> >>> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
> >>> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
> >>> content links.
> >>
> >> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
> >> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying
> >> with are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
> >>
> >>> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
> >>> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
> >>> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
> >>
> >> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling
> >> checker and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
> >>
> >>> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
> >>> will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
> >>>
> >>> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
> >>> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
> >>> sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
> >>
> >> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO
> >> optimisation. You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed
> >> out this sounds a lot like a CMS and not a framework.
> >>
> >>> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
> >>> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
> >>> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
> >>> resting for the viewers on a page.
> >>
> >> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not
> >> even slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but
> >> I'm using some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's
> >> covered by numerous patents, so you might not want to shout about it
> >> too loudly.
> >>
> >>> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
> >>> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
> >>> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
> >>> during the runtime of the application.
> >>
> >> Sold!!
> >>
> >>> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
> >>> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
> >>> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
> >>> for performing psychological operations over the internet.
> >>>
> >>> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
> >>> now a days.
> >>
> >> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
> >> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
> >>
> >>> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
> >>> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
> >>> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
> >>
> >> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging
> >> is derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication
> >> consisting primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse
> >> chronological order)". There is no requirement for a particular page
> >> layout or for specific page elements to be present.
> >>
> >>> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
> >>> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
> >>> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
> >>> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
> >>> as what ever you could think of.
> >>
> >> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for
> >> your website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
> >>
> >>> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
> >>> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
> >>> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
> >>> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
> >>> as a nonquery url, like:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
> >> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
> >>
> >>> Done without mod_rewrite.
> >>
> >> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how
> >> is this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but
> >> I'd be interested to know which you are using and what you have
> >> against mod_rewrite.
> >>
> >> > I hope I answered all your questions.
> >>
> >> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
> >>
> >> > Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Yours sarcastically,
> >>
> >> -Stut
> >>
> >>> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> >>>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
> >>>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
> >>>> 3) Make sure it's in English
> >>>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
> >>>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really
> >>>> gonna care!
> >>>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
> >>>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
> >>>> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
> >>>>
> >>>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
> >>>>
> >>>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
> >>>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
> >>>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards
> >>>> regarding URLs. Do you have a reference?
> >>>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide
> >>>> world to do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on
> >>>> it? Because what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners
> >>>> out there you could well be!
> >>>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
> >>>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without
> >>>> use of mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in
> >>>> your URLs?
> >>>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Stut
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> With Warm Regards,
> Sudheer. S
> http://www.binaryvibes.co.in
>

Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> The pages are all delivered by one single kind of page parser.
>
> Its consisting of round about 5 lines of code. But for different
> reasons there have to get written parsers, especially for the
> content to show. The longest parser is consisting of 11 lines
> of code.
>
> But I don't want to say more, otherwise my invention is not mine
> anymore. Me alone as a developer can't react fast enough, to ar-
> chive the success, I normaly ought to have, before everybody is
> running to archive the same innovations like me.

This is not your invention so I'm not sure what you think you're
protecting. It's known as the Front Controller pattern and is widely
used with and without a query string in both PHP and many other
languages. It can also require changes to the web server environment to
make it work. Google for "front controller pattern" for more information.

You didn't say what you have against mod_rewrite. I'll bet you
mod_rewrite can parse a request and send it to the right script faster
than your PHP implementation.

> But as I can see how you are reacting on it, and others as well
> everybody is really loves the behavior. Its long time ago that
> I spoke with other devs. So I really feel well about the conver-
> sation.

You're not quite catching on to my opinion of your "product", but I'm
glad you "feel well about the conversation".

> Thank you very much.

You're quite welcome.

-Stut

> Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Stut:
>> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
>>> hi stut,
>>>
>>> thank you for your advices.
>> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still,
>> since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to
>> enjoy myself...
>>
>>> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
>>> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
>>> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
>>> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
>>> language.
>> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave
>> the text on the page a name, how twee.
>>
>>> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
>>> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
>>> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
>>> content links.
>> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
>> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with
>> are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
>>
>>> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
>>> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
>>> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
>> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker
>> and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
>>
>>> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
>>> will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
>>>
>>> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
>>> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
>>> sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
>> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation.
>> You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a
>> lot like a CMS and not a framework.
>>
>>> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
>>> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
>>> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
>>> resting for the viewers on a page.
>> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even
>> slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using
>> some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous
>> patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly.
>>
>>> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
>>> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
>>> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
>>> during the runtime of the application.
>> Sold!!
>>
>>> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
>>> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
>>> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
>>> for performing psychological operations over the internet.
>>>
>>> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
>>> now a days.
>> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
>> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
>>
>>> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
>>> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
>>> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
>> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is
>> derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting
>> primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological
>> order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for
>> specific page elements to be present.
>>
>>> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
>>> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
>>> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
>>> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
>>> as what ever you could think of.
>> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your
>> website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
>>
>>> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
>>> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
>>> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
>>> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
>>> as a nonquery url, like:
>>>
>>> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/som...e-it-here.html
>> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
>> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
>>
>>> Done without mod_rewrite.
>> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is
>> this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be
>> interested to know which you are using and what you have against
>> mod_rewrite.
>>
>> > I hope I answered all your questions.
>>
>> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
>>
>> > Best Regards,
>>
>> Yours sarcastically,
>>
>> -Stut
>>
>>> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
>>>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
>>>>
>>>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
>>>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
>>>> 3) Make sure it's in English
>>>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
>>>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
>>>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
>>>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
>>>> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
>>>>
>>>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
>>>>
>>>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
>>>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
>>>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding
>>>> URLs. Do you have a reference?
>>>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to
>>>> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because
>>>> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you
>>>> could well be!
>>>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
>>>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of
>>>> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
>>>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
>>>>
>>>> -Stut
>>>>
>>
>