|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
We have our website and email hosted with an external web host. We would transfer everything to local but bandwidth is hard to come by at our location. What do we do to set up our AD with the same domain name as our web (to allow for future transitions to local) and connect to our current host? -- juicejug ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1689494.html |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"juicejug" <juicejug.2f6hkd@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in message
news:juicejug.2f6hkd@mail.webservertalk.com... > > We have our website and email hosted with an external web host. We > would transfer everything to local but bandwidth is hard to come by at > our location. What do we do to set up our AD with the same domain > name as our web (to allow for future transitions to local) and connect > to our current host? > It's called "shadow DNS" (aka "split DNS") where you setup your internal DNS zone with the same name but SEPARATELY with its own Primary. You must manually add all external records to that internal version (if you wish your internal clients to contact those external resources) and HAND manage any changes to the public version by duplicating those change manually on the internal. Most people talk about this as if it is the same "zone" but really it is TWO ZONES that happen to have the SAME NAME. BTW, if you need to ask about this you probably should pick a DIFFERENT name for your internal Domain & Zone but we will be happy to you if you really want to go this way. Some people discourage this in general but I have some Domains setup this way and it isn't really very hard once you get the idea. -- Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP Accelerated MCSE http://www.LearnQuick.Com [phone number on web site] > > > -- > juicejug > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1689494.html > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I understand using the second name. I thought I had mentioned in my original post that the reason for this was that we are adding exchange and want to fully manage email but still have the host control the hosting of our web site, therefore we will be using the same name. Sorry. Is there any MS link with more info on how to setup the split records you mentioned? Herb Martin wrote: > *"juicejug" <juicejug.2f6hkd@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in > message > news:juicejug.2f6hkd@mail.webservertalk.com... > > > > We have our website and email hosted with an external web host. > We > > would transfer everything to local but bandwidth is hard to come by > at > > our location. What do we do to set up our AD with the same > domain > > name as our web (to allow for future transitions to local) and > connect > > to our current host? > > > > It's called "shadow DNS" (aka "split DNS") where you > setup your internal DNS zone with the same name but > SEPARATELY with its own Primary. > > You must manually add all external records to that internal > version (if you wish your internal clients to contact those > external resources) and HAND manage any changes to the > public version by duplicating those change manually on the > internal. > > Most people talk about this as if it is the same "zone" but > really it is TWO ZONES that happen to have the SAME > NAME. > > BTW, if you need to ask about this you probably should > pick a DIFFERENT name for your internal Domain & > Zone but we will be happy to you if you really want > to go this way. > > Some people discourage this in general but I have some > Domains setup this way and it isn't really very hard once > you get the idea. > > > -- > Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP > Accelerated MCSE > http://www.LearnQuick.Com > [phone number on web site] > > > > > > > -- > > juicejug > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1689494.html > > * -- juicejug ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1689494.html |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"juicejug" <juicejug.2fh4wd@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in message
news:juicejug.2fh4wd@mail.webservertalk.com... > > I understand using the second name. I thought I had mentioned in my > original post that the reason for this was that we are adding exchange > and want to fully manage email but still have the host control the > hosting of our web site, therefore we will be using the same name. You "therefore" is likely misplace as there is not requirement for this based on what I understand you to be saying. Hosts can answer to many names -- live in one AD Domain and have many DNS names known to others. No Exchange server should be placed directly on the Internet unless you are absolutely an expert AND you have no other viable choice either. An email server does not even need to be in the same domain to host email for that domain name; ISPs do this all the time. > Sorry. Is there any MS link with more info on how to setup the split > records you mentioned? What else do you want to know? There really is nothing to the setup (there is a wizard in DNS) if you merely understand the goal: A Primary with optional Secondaries inside. A Primary with optional Secondaries outside. Any record added or changed on the outside must be manually maintained on the inside by you. (Inside you might substitute AD-Integrated for the Primary and optionally for the Seondaries but the principle remains unchanged.) -- Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP Accelerated MCSE http://www.LearnQuick.Com [phone number on web site] > > > Herb Martin wrote: >> *"juicejug" <juicejug.2f6hkd@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in >> message >> news:juicejug.2f6hkd@mail.webservertalk.com... >> > >> > We have our website and email hosted with an external web host. >> We >> > would transfer everything to local but bandwidth is hard to come by >> at >> > our location. What do we do to set up our AD with the same >> domain >> > name as our web (to allow for future transitions to local) and >> connect >> > to our current host? >> > >> >> It's called "shadow DNS" (aka "split DNS") where you >> setup your internal DNS zone with the same name but >> SEPARATELY with its own Primary. >> >> You must manually add all external records to that internal >> version (if you wish your internal clients to contact those >> external resources) and HAND manage any changes to the >> public version by duplicating those change manually on the >> internal. >> >> Most people talk about this as if it is the same "zone" but >> really it is TWO ZONES that happen to have the SAME >> NAME. >> >> BTW, if you need to ask about this you probably should >> pick a DIFFERENT name for your internal Domain & >> Zone but we will be happy to you if you really want >> to go this way. >> >> Some people discourage this in general but I have some >> Domains setup this way and it isn't really very hard once >> you get the idea. >> >> >> -- >> Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP >> Accelerated MCSE >> http://www.LearnQuick.Com >> [phone number on web site] >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > juicejug >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1689494.html >> > * > > > > -- > juicejug > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1689494.html > |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|