|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
So everyone, I've spent hours scouring the net and haven't really come up
with a definitive answer. I have: - a static IP from a local ISP - DSL through local telco, with router - Two boxes: 1) Win2K box, IP=10.0.0.2, w/ IIS, DNS, AD, and it's a PDC ... 2) is a mail server (Win2003 server), member of domain FARICY.NET, which is on box 1. Everything works GREAT. I only have one problem. I set up DNS on box 1 with primary zone FARICY.NET which is AD integrated and allows dynamic updates. Router forwards all traffic from 53 to box 1 for resolution. FARICY.NET contains all proper information needed to run my web services and works great. EXCEPT ... AD insists on updating the zone with (same as parent folder) HOST 10.0.0.2 ............. *in addition* to what I REALLY want (to be the default at least) is: (same as parent folder) HOST my.public.ip.address They are both there, so I have two entries for FARICY.NET... @ IN A 10.0.0.2 @ IN A my.public.ip.address Whenever I run an nslookup, it always returns two results: Non-authoritative answer: Name: faricy.net Addresses: my.public.ip.address, 10.0.0.2 Unfortunately, when I try to ping or visit faricy.net via local DNS or after it propogates to my ISP, etc,, it tries to resolve 10.0.0.2. Is there ANY way I can stop AD from messing with just this particular entry?? Or any recommended solution? I would be very grateful!!! Thank you so much. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Aha! I might have found something... Will this work??
__________________________________________________ __________________ This is good especially if you have a Split Horizon environment where the internal and external domain names are the same and the users need to get to their external name by http://theirdomain.com but their DC/DNS server responds and not the actual external website. This one is done on the netlogon service parameters in the registry. This will stop netlogon registering the blank FQDN with the internal private IP. This stops the netlogon service from registering that "Blank Domain FQDN" IP address. Those IPs are actually called the LdapIPAddress. Then you manually create a blank FQDN with the IP that you do want, whether a local private IP or some public IP, any or mutliple IPs, if you want. If your ISP rotates or changes the website IP, then this will not work. Usually we can delegate the www zone to the SOA of your external domain, but this can;t be done with the blank domain record. =========================================== Disabling the Same As Parent LdapIpAddress blank FQDN [Taken from http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328] You do this by adding a registry entry to the DC(s) and rebooting: 1) Add the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\Netlogon\Parameters Registry Value: DnsAvoidRegisterRecords and add the "LdapIpAddress" Mnemonic. 2) Do this on all DCs and restart netlogon or restart machine. This will prevent the DC from adding the domain A records from netlogon. And you can add multiple Blank Domain A records as you need. ==================================== ==================================== If you want to create mutliples, you can do it manually as I mentioned above, or use this method to force the system to do it for you. I would rather create them manually but here;s the instructions if you feel up to it.... Now you can also publish the IP you want instead of having to put it in manually for the blank FQDN. Do this on the DNS service in the registry. [Taken from http://support.microsoft.com/?id=275554] Configure the DNS service to publish a specific IP addresses to the DNS zone. To do so, make the following registry modification: PublishAddresses HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\DNS\Parameters Data type: REG_SZ Range: IP address [IP address] Default value: blank This modification specifies the IP addresses that you want to publish for the computer. The DNS server creates A records only for the addresses in this list. If this entry does not appear in the registry, or if its value is blank, the DNS server creates an A record for each of the computer's IP addresses. This entry is for computers that have multiple IP addresses, only a subset of which you want to publish. Typically, this prevents the DNS server from returning a private network address in response to a query when the computer has a corporate network address. __________________________________________________ __________________ "Ryan Faricy" <ryan@faricy.net> wrote in message news:eOmOu2o5GHA.2264@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > So everyone, I've spent hours scouring the net and haven't really come up > with a definitive answer. > > I have: > - a static IP from a local ISP > - DSL through local telco, with router > - Two boxes: 1) Win2K box, IP=10.0.0.2, w/ IIS, DNS, AD, and it's a PDC > ... 2) is a mail server (Win2003 server), member of domain FARICY.NET, > which is on box 1. > > Everything works GREAT. I only have one problem. > > I set up DNS on box 1 with primary zone FARICY.NET which is AD integrated > and allows dynamic updates. Router forwards all traffic from 53 to box 1 > for resolution. > > FARICY.NET contains all proper information needed to run my web services > and works great. EXCEPT ... AD insists on updating the zone with > (same as parent folder) HOST 10.0.0.2 ............. *in addition* to what > I REALLY want (to be the default at least) is: > (same as parent folder) HOST my.public.ip.address > > They are both there, so I have two entries for FARICY.NET... > @ IN A 10.0.0.2 > @ IN A my.public.ip.address > > Whenever I run an nslookup, it always returns two results: > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: faricy.net > Addresses: my.public.ip.address, 10.0.0.2 > > Unfortunately, when I try to ping or visit faricy.net via local DNS or > after it propogates to my ISP, etc,, it tries to resolve 10.0.0.2. > > Is there ANY way I can stop AD from messing with just this particular > entry?? Or any recommended solution? > > I would be very grateful!!! Thank you so much. > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I found exactly what I needed ...
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328 For anyone else who needs it! "Ryan Faricy" <ryan@faricy.net> wrote in message news:eOmOu2o5GHA.2264@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > So everyone, I've spent hours scouring the net and haven't really come up > with a definitive answer. > > I have: > - a static IP from a local ISP > - DSL through local telco, with router > - Two boxes: 1) Win2K box, IP=10.0.0.2, w/ IIS, DNS, AD, and it's a PDC > ... 2) is a mail server (Win2003 server), member of domain FARICY.NET, > which is on box 1. > > Everything works GREAT. I only have one problem. > > I set up DNS on box 1 with primary zone FARICY.NET which is AD integrated > and allows dynamic updates. Router forwards all traffic from 53 to box 1 > for resolution. > > FARICY.NET contains all proper information needed to run my web services > and works great. EXCEPT ... AD insists on updating the zone with > (same as parent folder) HOST 10.0.0.2 ............. *in addition* to what > I REALLY want (to be the default at least) is: > (same as parent folder) HOST my.public.ip.address > > They are both there, so I have two entries for FARICY.NET... > @ IN A 10.0.0.2 > @ IN A my.public.ip.address > > Whenever I run an nslookup, it always returns two results: > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: faricy.net > Addresses: my.public.ip.address, 10.0.0.2 > > Unfortunately, when I try to ping or visit faricy.net via local DNS or > after it propogates to my ISP, etc,, it tries to resolve 10.0.0.2. > > Is there ANY way I can stop AD from messing with just this particular > entry?? Or any recommended solution? > > I would be very grateful!!! Thank you so much. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Ryan Faricy wrote:
> I found exactly what I needed ... > > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328 Unfortunately, this is not the intended purpose of this article. Oh it will stop the registration of the record but you're going to break replication and Group Policies, using this in your situation. The zone for the AD domain is for Active Directory communication and should not be used as a public zone, especially for a web site. You need to move the Public zone off the Domain controller to a DNS server that does not resolve internal domains. I'm not saying you should not host your own zone and preach to you about leaving the public zone with your registrar. Who you get to host you public zone is your choice, just don't use the same zone for both public and private resolution. Keep them separate on different servers. -- Best regards, Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] Hope This s =================================== When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit from your issue, to respond directly to me remove the nospam. from my email address. =================================== http://www.lonestaramerica.com/ http://support.wftx.us/ http://message.wftx.us/ =================================== Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix: It will strip signature out and more http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ =================================== Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders with OEBackup: http://www.oe.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx =================================== |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
It's a tiny domain with no need for GP etc... But I just had an idea too...
I keep my AD zones on box 1 (well I have to, it's the PDC), put my public zones on box 2 (mail server) and route all router traffic on port 53 to the mail server. That should work fine, the network won't care if there are 2 primary nameservers that aren't mirrored if only one is being referenced (box 1) by the domain clients, and the other one is public-only. Yeah ... Windows wouldn't be overwriting my zones with its own stuff to keep the domain happy... And all domain computers will still function normally, and I could delete the regkey I added and all will live happily ever after... I'd just create a standard primary zone on the DNS server on box 2, route 53 tcp/udp to it and I don't think anything will even blink once I have it set up correctly. It's been such a long day, I don't know why I didn't think of this yesterday. :-P Public shame!! haha. If you have any further recommendations or input, feel free to let me know. Any potential security issues with this even with dynupdates off, etc? Thanks a bunch btw! "Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]" <admin@nospam.WFTX.US> wrote in message news:eUrlI6p5GHA.4116@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Ryan Faricy wrote: >> I found exactly what I needed ... >> >> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328 > > Unfortunately, this is not the intended purpose of this article. Oh it > will > stop the registration of the record but you're going to break replication > and Group Policies, using this in your situation. > The zone for the AD domain is for Active Directory communication and > should > not be used as a public zone, especially for a web site. > You need to move the Public zone off the Domain controller to a DNS server > that does not resolve internal domains. I'm not saying you should not host > your own zone and preach to you about leaving the public zone with your > registrar. Who you get to host you public zone is your choice, just don't > use the same zone for both public and private resolution. Keep them > separate > on different servers. > > -- > Best regards, > Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] > Hope This s > =================================== > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" > via your newsreader so that others may learn and > benefit from your issue, to respond directly to > me remove the nospam. from my email address. > =================================== > http://www.lonestaramerica.com/ > http://support.wftx.us/ > http://message.wftx.us/ > =================================== > Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix: > It will strip signature out and more > http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ > =================================== > Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders > with OEBackup: > http://www.oe.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx > =================================== > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Yep I moved all public DNS over to box 2 and everything is just dandy now.
Thanks again!! "Ryan Faricy" <ryan@faricy.net> wrote in message news:uL$8WPq5GHA.668@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > It's a tiny domain with no need for GP etc... But I just had an idea > too... > > I keep my AD zones on box 1 (well I have to, it's the PDC), put my public > zones on box 2 (mail server) and route all router traffic on port 53 to > the mail server. That should work fine, the network won't care if there > are 2 primary nameservers that aren't mirrored if only one is being > referenced (box 1) by the domain clients, and the other one is > public-only. > > Yeah ... Windows wouldn't be overwriting my zones with its own stuff to > keep the domain happy... And all domain computers will still function > normally, and I could delete the regkey I added and all will live happily > ever after... > > I'd just create a standard primary zone on the DNS server on box 2, route > 53 tcp/udp to it and I don't think anything will even blink once I have it > set up correctly. > > It's been such a long day, I don't know why I didn't think of this > yesterday. :-P Public shame!! haha. > > If you have any further recommendations or input, feel free to let me > know. Any potential security issues with this even with dynupdates off, > etc? Thanks a bunch btw! > > "Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]" <admin@nospam.WFTX.US> wrote in message > news:eUrlI6p5GHA.4116@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Ryan Faricy wrote: >>> I found exactly what I needed ... >>> >>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328 >> >> Unfortunately, this is not the intended purpose of this article. Oh it >> will >> stop the registration of the record but you're going to break replication >> and Group Policies, using this in your situation. >> The zone for the AD domain is for Active Directory communication and >> should >> not be used as a public zone, especially for a web site. >> You need to move the Public zone off the Domain controller to a DNS >> server >> that does not resolve internal domains. I'm not saying you should not >> host >> your own zone and preach to you about leaving the public zone with your >> registrar. Who you get to host you public zone is your choice, just don't >> use the same zone for both public and private resolution. Keep them >> separate >> on different servers. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] >> Hope This s >> =================================== >> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" >> via your newsreader so that others may learn and >> benefit from your issue, to respond directly to >> me remove the nospam. from my email address. >> =================================== >> http://www.lonestaramerica.com/ >> http://support.wftx.us/ >> http://message.wftx.us/ >> =================================== >> Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix: >> It will strip signature out and more >> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ >> =================================== >> Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders >> with OEBackup: >> http://www.oe.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx >> =================================== >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Ryan Faricy wrote:
> It's a tiny domain with no need for GP etc... But I just had an idea > too... Your deduction that the domain is tiny and has no need for GP is flawed, the are default group policies in all Active Directory domains, the policies are accessed in the \\ADDNSDomainName\SYSVOL DFS share, which is why the AD DNS Domain name must resolve only to Domain Controllers, and only to the IPs on the DCs that have file sharing enabled. If the AD DNS Domain name resolves to a web server (that in not a DC) then member clients will search the web server for group policies; and logon scripts which are located in the \\ADDNADomainName\NETLOGON DFS share. > > I keep my AD zones on box 1 (well I have to, it's the PDC), put my > public zones on box 2 (mail server) and route all router traffic on > port 53 to the mail server. That should work fine, the network won't > care if there are 2 primary nameservers that aren't mirrored if only > one is being referenced (box 1) by the domain clients, and the other > one is public-only. > > Yeah ... Windows wouldn't be overwriting my zones with its own stuff > to keep the domain happy... And all domain computers will still > function normally, and I could delete the regkey I added and all will > live happily ever after... > > I'd just create a standard primary zone on the DNS server on box 2, > route 53 tcp/udp to it and I don't think anything will even blink > once I have it set up correctly. If you keep your public zone on a DC, you will have to use standard primary zones on all, you cannot make the zone ADI on one DC and Standard Primary on another. This creates another problem by removing the secure updates from the zone. -- Best regards, Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] Hope This s =================================== When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit from your issue, to respond directly to me remove the nospam. from my email address. =================================== http://www.lonestaramerica.com/ http://support.wftx.us/ http://message.wftx.us/ =================================== Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix: It will strip signature out and more http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ =================================== Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders with OEBackup: http://www.oe.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx =================================== |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
box 2 is not a DC...
"Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]" <admin@nospam.WFTX.US> wrote in message news:%23yHfkru5GHA.3808@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Ryan Faricy wrote: >> It's a tiny domain with no need for GP etc... But I just had an idea >> too... > > Your deduction that the domain is tiny and has no need for GP is flawed, > the > are default group policies in all Active Directory domains, the policies > are > accessed in the \\ADDNSDomainName\SYSVOL DFS share, which is why the AD > DNS > Domain name must resolve only to Domain Controllers, and only to the IPs > on > the DCs that have file sharing enabled. If the AD DNS Domain name resolves > to a web server (that in not a DC) then member clients will search the web > server for group policies; and logon scripts which are located in the > \\ADDNADomainName\NETLOGON DFS share. > >> >> I keep my AD zones on box 1 (well I have to, it's the PDC), put my >> public zones on box 2 (mail server) and route all router traffic on >> port 53 to the mail server. That should work fine, the network won't >> care if there are 2 primary nameservers that aren't mirrored if only >> one is being referenced (box 1) by the domain clients, and the other >> one is public-only. >> >> Yeah ... Windows wouldn't be overwriting my zones with its own stuff >> to keep the domain happy... And all domain computers will still >> function normally, and I could delete the regkey I added and all will >> live happily ever after... >> >> I'd just create a standard primary zone on the DNS server on box 2, >> route 53 tcp/udp to it and I don't think anything will even blink >> once I have it set up correctly. > > If you keep your public zone on a DC, you will have to use standard > primary > zones on all, you cannot make the zone ADI on one DC and Standard Primary > on > another. This creates another problem by removing the secure updates from > the zone. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|