PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Noms de domaine > ms.public.win2000.dns > Changing the IP address scheme of a single server network
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
Changing the IP address scheme of a single server network

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 06/03/2006, 18h20   #1
Steve Keogh
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Changing the IP address scheme of a single server network

This may be a little convoluted. I inherited a small network with a new job.
A single server running WIN 2000 Advanced, clients all run WIN XP Pro. All
service packs etc. installed.

The server is the DC, and also runs the DNS with AD. The network is on
static IP's to facilitate outside IT support. We no longer use the outside
tech company. We have run out of available IP address through growth.

I would like to move the network to a private address scheme(192.168.1.0
with a subnet of 255.255.255.0) with NAT routing enabled on our ISP's
router(router would have address 192.168.1.1) and then run DHCP on our
server. I need in migrating the server form the old static address to a
static address in the new scheme, and keep DNS etc. working. Anyone have any
ideas?

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 07/03/2006, 02h09   #2
Kurt
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Changing the IP address scheme of a single server network

DNS is by domain names (zones), not IP addresses, so DNS won't be an issue
IF you have all of your workstations registering themselves. But since
you'll have to visit the workstations to change their IP addresses anyway, I
would install DHCP on the server, set up a scope for your new IP range -
like 192.168.1.20 - 254, leaving enough out for static devices like servers,
printers, routers, etc. Make sure you set your DHCP to register IP address
leases in DNS. Then when you visit your clients, just set them for DHCP
(make sure the DHCP server is disabled on your NAT router). Do an ipconfig
/renew and verify that you get an IP address in the proper range. Should be
all done. Then next time you need to expand it'll take you 10 minutes (plus
printers).

....kurt

"Steve Keogh" <SteveKeogh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5DC37D91-65B3-4C33-9BCC-584DD5C222BB@microsoft.com...
> This may be a little convoluted. I inherited a small network with a new
> job.
> A single server running WIN 2000 Advanced, clients all run WIN XP Pro.
> All
> service packs etc. installed.
>
> The server is the DC, and also runs the DNS with AD. The network is on
> static IP's to facilitate outside IT support. We no longer use the
> outside
> tech company. We have run out of available IP address through growth.
>
> I would like to move the network to a private address scheme(192.168.1.0
> with a subnet of 255.255.255.0) with NAT routing enabled on our ISP's
> router(router would have address 192.168.1.1) and then run DHCP on our
> server. I need in migrating the server form the old static address
> to a
> static address in the new scheme, and keep DNS etc. working. Anyone have
> any
> ideas?
>



  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 06h45.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,07357 seconds with 10 queries