PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Noms de domaine > ms.public.win.server.dns > Reverse zone - one zone or multiple zones ?
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
Reverse zone - one zone or multiple zones ?

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 12/06/2007, 13h33   #1
Alex
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Reverse zone - one zone or multiple zones ?

Hi. We are currently setting up a reverse lookup zone(s) on our Windows
2003 DC(s) which also hosts DNS. Our network contains mainly 2000, XP
clients with 2000 & 2003 servers Our network is of small-medium size with
5-10 subnets e.g. 205.1.1.x to 20.1.1.20.x/24

If possible could anyone advise whether we should create individual reverse
lookup zones for each subnet ie. 205.1.1.x, 205.1.2.x etc or whether we
should create 205.1.x.x to accomodate all zones ?

Alex.


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 12/06/2007, 14h49   #2
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Reverse zone - one zone or multiple zones ?

Read inline please.

In news:%23jbbp3OrHHA.4100@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,
Alex <news@ms.com.news> typed:
> Hi. We are currently setting up a reverse lookup zone(s) on our
> Windows 2003 DC(s) which also hosts DNS. Our network contains mainly
> 2000, XP clients with 2000 & 2003 servers Our network is of
> small-medium size with 5-10 subnets e.g. 205.1.1.x to 20.1.1.20.x/24
>
> If possible could anyone advise whether we should create individual
> reverse lookup zones for each subnet ie. 205.1.1.x, 205.1.2.x etc or
> whether we should create 205.1.x.x to accomodate all zones ?


Use a zone for each subnet, 205.1.x is a /16 subnet, with 65534 addresses in
it, unless you own or control all of these don't include them in your
reverse lookup.



--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This s

===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
http://support.wftx.us/
http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oe.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 12/06/2007, 15h58   #3
Alex
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Reverse zone - one zone or multiple zones ?

Hi Kevin. Thanks for your advice. Just so I fully understand, if we use
classless-subnetting so that we end up with vlans using 205.1.1.x,
205.1.2.x/24 etc does this have any influence on the decision ? We still
own/control the entire 205.1.x.x range .

Also, are there any documents which cover the reasons on how to decide which
method to select i.e. single subnet, multiple subnets or is it purely down
to the easiest method to manage/implement based on the IP subnets you
control ?

Thanks.

Alex.


"Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]" <admin@nospam.WFTX.US> wrote in message
news:%232P0xhPrHHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Read inline please.
>
> In news:%23jbbp3OrHHA.4100@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,
> Alex <news@ms.com.news> typed:
>> Hi. We are currently setting up a reverse lookup zone(s) on our
>> Windows 2003 DC(s) which also hosts DNS. Our network contains mainly
>> 2000, XP clients with 2000 & 2003 servers Our network is of
>> small-medium size with 5-10 subnets e.g. 205.1.1.x to 20.1.1.20.x/24
>>
>> If possible could anyone advise whether we should create individual
>> reverse lookup zones for each subnet ie. 205.1.1.x, 205.1.2.x etc or
>> whether we should create 205.1.x.x to accomodate all zones ?

>
> Use a zone for each subnet, 205.1.x is a /16 subnet, with 65534 addresses
> in
> it, unless you own or control all of these don't include them in your
> reverse lookup.
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
> Hope This s
>
> ===================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
> via your newsreader so that others may learn and
> benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
> me remove the nospam. from my email address.
> ===================================
> http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
> http://support.wftx.us/
> http://message.wftx.us/
> ===================================
> Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
> It will strip signature out and more
> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
> ===================================
> Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
> with OEBackup:
> http://www.oe.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
> ===================================
>
>



  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 03h28.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,11554 seconds with 11 queries