PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Noms de domaine > ms.public.win.server.dns > MS DHCP Server and BIND DDNS
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
MS DHCP Server and BIND DDNS

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 28/12/2006, 21h46   #1
Geoff
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut MS DHCP Server and BIND DDNS

Quick question.....

Will a Microsoft DHCP server running on Win2K3 send Dynamic updates to a
BIND DNS server ?


TIA

Geoff
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 01/01/2007, 04h52   #2
Herb Martin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: MS DHCP Server and BIND DDNS


"Geoff" <nigeltufnel123@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eVehlmsKHHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Quick question.....
>
> Will a Microsoft DHCP server running on Win2K3 send Dynamic updates to a
> BIND DNS server ?


I haven't tested it but it should, and I can think of no reason
this would not work in general.

You will likely be much better off if you switch to Microsoft
AD DNS with "Secure Updates Only" but this doesn't mean
your setup CANNOT work.


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 02/01/2007, 21h08   #3
Geoff
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: MS DHCP Server and BIND DDNS

Thanks !

I've done some testing and it does work, provided that the dns suffix of
the machine (not the connection suffix) matches the BIND zone.

Which brings me to another question, is it possible to use option 81
(FQDN) on a MS DHCP server ?


Herb Martin wrote:
> "Geoff" <nigeltufnel123@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eVehlmsKHHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Quick question.....
>>
>> Will a Microsoft DHCP server running on Win2K3 send Dynamic updates to a
>> BIND DNS server ?

>
> I haven't tested it but it should, and I can think of no reason
> this would not work in general.
>
> You will likely be much better off if you switch to Microsoft
> AD DNS with "Secure Updates Only" but this doesn't mean
> your setup CANNOT work.
>
>

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 04/01/2007, 16h07   #4
Ace Fekay [MVP]
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: MS DHCP Server and BIND DDNS

In news:eop8YIrLHHA.420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,
Geoff <nigeltufnel123@gmail.com> stated, which I commented on below:
> Thanks !
>
> I've done some testing and it does work, provided that the dns suffix
> of the machine (not the connection suffix) matches the BIND zone.
>
> Which brings me to another question, is it possible to use option 81
> (FQDN) on a MS DHCP server ?


Option 081 is default on Microsoft DHCP. Matter of fact you can control it
by looking in DHCP properties, DNS tab. It doesn't specifically say 081, but
that is what that tab is for.

btw- BIND does NOT support Microsoft Secure Updates. BIND uses TSIGS
(transaction signatures) to secure communication for DNS traffic, which
Microsof products do not use.

If you want true secure updates and minimal administration, it is easier to
just only use Microsoft DHCP and DNS. The DHCP and DNS APIs are written to
work hand in hand together seemlessly. With BIND, you have to do some extra
steps to make it work but will be limited with functionality, especially not
having the ability to use AD integrated zones, where the zone is actually
stored in the AD database, which will replicate automatically and exists on
all DCs, and is much more secure than BIND's text files. After all, you MUST
be authenticated to AD to be able to view the data. With Microsoft products,
it just works out of the box.

I'm not trying to say you must use this, or you must use that. I am just
saying that it is easier and more secure to use Windows DNS. I think BIND is
a fabulous product, but when it comes to AD, Windows DNS is much more
efficient with a host of extra features and increased security that BIND
cannot offer. I know a friend of mine that swears by BIND and will jump thru
hoops to appropriate and pay for additional servers running Linux just to
use it. He told me he *wants* it because he's been using BIND for over 10
years and won't let go of it. But when he has problems with updates, he gets
flustered and starts emailing me with a host of questions about Microsoft
DNS. :-)

--
Ace
Innovative IT Concepts, Inc (IITCI)
Willow Grove, PA

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Microsoft Certified Trainer

Having difficulty reading or finding responses to your post?
Instead of the website you're using, I suggest to use OEx (Outlook Express
or any other newsreader), and configure a news account, pointing to
news.microsoft.com. This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public
Newsgroups. It is FREE and requires NO ISP's Usenet account. OEx allows you
to easily find, track threads, cross-post, sort by date, poster's name,
watched threads or subject.
It's easy:

How to Configure OEx for Internet News
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=171164

Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations
Assimilation Imminent. Resistance is Futile
"Very funny Scotty. Now, beam down my clothes."

The only constant in life is change...


  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 12h28.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,14861 seconds with 12 queries