PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Noms de domaine > ms.public.win.server.dns > Primary vs Secondary DNS Server
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 19/10/2006, 20h23   #1
Chris Peikert
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

I have a network with 2 subnets. Each subnet has its own Windows 2003 server
using DHCP to issue its addresses. Should both servers on each subnet be a
Primary DNS server or can only one be a Primary and the other Secondary?


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 19/10/2006, 20h59   #2
RC
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

each subnet can have its own primary dns server.

you can also have them setup as AD integrated zones.

Rich

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 19/10/2006, 22h36   #3
Chris Peikert
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

Thanks.


"RC" <RichChristy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161287999.638201.111920@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> each subnet can have its own primary dns server.
>
> you can also have them setup as AD integrated zones.
>
> Rich
>



  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 20/10/2006, 16h39   #4
Herb Martin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

"Chris Peikert" <c.peikert@co.matagorda.tx.us> wrote in message
news:5hQZg.14318$GR.5389@newssvr29.news.prodigy.ne t...
>I have a network with 2 subnets. Each subnet has its own Windows 2003
>server using DHCP to issue its addresses. Should both servers on each
>subnet be a Primary DNS server or can only one be a Primary and the other
>Secondary?


Only one can be a Primary for a SINGLE ZONE (domain name),
unless you mean an Active Directory Integrated "set of" Primaries.

AD Integrated DNS is sometimes referred to as a type of Primary
but I generally think it is best to distinguish them as a "set" which
replaces the single (traditional) Primary.

You can only have one traditional Primary for a single zone (if
you wish it the DNS to fully replicate.) With traditional Primaries,
all additional DNS servers must be Secondary (or perhaps stub)
if they hold that same zone.

You can have as many AD-Integrated DNS servers as you wish
since they are multi-mastered.

Notice that if you have multiple zones (DNS names) then each
will have a set of 'One Primary' OR 'AD_Integrated', each with
optional Secondaries.

--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]

>



  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 20/10/2006, 16h40   #5
Herb Martin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

"RC" <RichChristy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161287999.638201.111920@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> each subnet can have its own primary dns server.
>
> you can also have them setup as AD integrated zones.


You cannot have more than one Primary for the same zone
(unless you actually wish to break replication as in Shadow
DNS setups.)

You can have multiple AD Integrated DNS for a single
zone since hey are multi-mastered.

--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]

>
> Rich
>



  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 23/10/2006, 13h47   #6
RC
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

I should have made my statement less confusing. I meant to say AD
integrated. I never think of anything less in an AD enviornment. I
should has said that.

thanks for correcting me Herb.

Rich

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 23/10/2006, 16h09   #7
Herb Martin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Primary vs Secondary DNS Server

"RC" <RichChristy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161607652.991613.254170@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>I should have made my statement less confusing. I meant to say AD
> integrated. I never think of anything less in an AD enviornment. I
> should has said that.
>
> thanks for correcting me Herb.


Well, Microsoft has confused the terminology.

Originally, they always discussed The Primary DNS and
AD-Integrated DNS as two separate ideas with different
names.

In Windows 2003, they (sometimes) call AD-Integrated
DNS servers a form of primary.

Clearly the single (traditional) Primary and the newer AD
Integrated "set" of DNS servers play the same role and
are (generally) mutually exclusive, i.e., you use one type or
the other for a single zone if you want it to replicate.

Part of the point of the AD Integrated DNS server 'set' is to
allow for multiple masters, but these can also have traditional
secondaries since secondaries just pull (do zone transfers)
from another DNS server of the same zone.

--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]


  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 19h45.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,13729 seconds with 15 queries