|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I am researching Windows 2003 DNS and will be replacing a BIND server.
I was asked if Windows 2003 DNS support "Single Answer Zone Transfers". Does anyone know? I will be using an AD integrated zone and will have zone transfer partners running all different version of DNS. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
<dbradford24@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1157727516.529939.229380@d34g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com... >I am researching Windows 2003 DNS and will be replacing a BIND server. > I was asked if Windows 2003 DNS support "Single Answer Zone Transfers". > Does anyone know? No, no one knows. <grin> That phrase does not appear even in Google, both web sites and Google news groups (except for your post and this thread.) My first guess would be that the questioner meant "incremental transfers" -- i.e., sending only CHANGES rather than the full zone. If so, the answer is YES. Windows DNS supports incremental transfers both with AD (which is even more efficient) and with traditional Primary-Secondary transfers, even when working with UNIX (e.g., BIND) server. > I will be using an AD integrated zone and will have zone transfer > partners running all different version of DNS. AD Integrated Zones are replicated through AD replication so no actual 'zone transfer' (per se) takes place unless you also have additional secondaries pulling the zone. They still support incremental transfers to such secondaries. But for normal AD replication only changes are sent, and the data is compressed when traversing your WANs (assuming proper setup of your Sites so that intersite replication is used over the WANs.) If I guessed wrong, then just find out what was meant by "Single Answer Zone Transfers" and ask again; we'll try to . -- Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP Accelerated MCSE http://www.LearnQuick.Com [phone number on web site] |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|