Hey guys, wondering if you've seen this article on cnet regarding adobing
making content visible. Wonder if 100% flash sites will be a more viable
option?...

thoughts/comments?

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-99...l?tag=nefd.top

mike

> Hey guys, wondering if you've seen this article on cnet regarding adobing
> making content visible. Wonder if 100% flash sites will be a more viable
> option?...
>
> thoughts/comments?

A little too little too late, but still a good thing, of course.

Most folks aren't in a hurry for 100% flash sites anymore, though.

-Darrel

southdaytona wrote:
> Hey guys, wondering if you've seen this article on cnet regarding adobing
> making content visible. Wonder if 100% flash sites will be a more viable
> option?...
>
> thoughts/comments?
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-99...l?tag=nefd.top
>
> mike
>

Still not accessible, just visible to Google and Yahoo.

Steve

Good point steve, I didn't think about that.

mike

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:16:31 +0000 (UTC), "southdaytona"
<webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote:

>Hey guys, wondering if you've seen this article on cnet regarding adobing
>making content visible. Wonder if 100% flash sites will be a more viable
>option?...
>
> thoughts/comments?

There's still no way to link to anything that doesn't show up when the
page loads. Consider a user that searches for something and follows a
link to the page with the Flash movie. They then have to poke around
the movie trying to find what it was they searched for. I don't think
this is a viable solution to the issue.

Gary