|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Is it possible to fix the size of text on a web page (i.e. not letting viewers use their browser's text bigger/smaller controls) without resorting to a graphic?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
No its not possible, and why would you want to. You would drive away return
visitors. Michael "JimHawkins" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message news:ftk5tl$obf$1@forums.macromedia.com... > Is it possible to fix the size of text on a web page (i.e. not letting > viewers use their browser's text bigger/smaller controls) without > resorting to a graphic? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
Just assign the size to text in pixels. This way the size is absolute and the users cannot change it in the browser. Hope this s. Gaurav www.gauravchandra.com |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
>Just assign the size to text in pixels. This way the size is absolute and the
users cannot change it in the browser. That is wrong. There is no way to fix text size in a browser. The only solution is to use Flash or an graphic. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Interesting... I had a fair amount of text, so I did a jpeg. But it took long time to load. So went back to text.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
>...so I did a jpeg. But it took long time to load
You can reduce most jpegs to small files with optimisation in an image-editing programme such as PaintShop Pro, Photoshop or Fireworks, playing with the numbers and getting the balance right between size and quality. I'm not suggesting this is better than text btw. -- Jo "Karlhevera" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message news:ftkgpt$5i1$1@forums.macromedia.com... > Interesting... I had a fair amount of text, so I did a jpeg. But it took > long time to load. So went back to text. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> Just assign the size to text in pixels. This way the size is absolute and
> the users cannot change it in the browser. Try it. It doesn't work like that. -- Regards John Waller |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
A GIF would certainly be better for text than a JPG and smaller too, but
either approach is the wrong one, honestly. -- Murray --- ICQ 71997575 Adobe Community Expert (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!) ================== http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources ================== "josie1one" <joleros@spamoffyahoo.com> wrote in message news:ftkl2c$bj5$1@forums.macromedia.com... > >...so I did a jpeg. But it took long time to load > > You can reduce most jpegs to small files with optimisation in an > image-editing programme such as PaintShop Pro, Photoshop or Fireworks, > playing with the numbers and getting the balance right between size and > quality. I'm not suggesting this is better than text btw. > > -- > Jo > > > > "Karlhevera" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message > news:ftkgpt$5i1$1@forums.macromedia.com... >> Interesting... I had a fair amount of text, so I did a jpeg. But it took >> long time to load. So went back to text. > > |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|