|
|
|
|
||||||
| linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Check this out, I downgrade to sarge which was the highest form of sarge
before everything moved along into etch and later lenny. The aptitude package was uninstalled and so I try repeating that operation where bsdgames and emacs21 get installed together. Emacs21 has aptitude as a dependency and cannot install without aptitude being preinstalled and happy. If that problem never did get remedied (aptitude required to install emacs) then there's no point in my taking any of this any further. For one thing aptitude ought to be a pre-dependency of emacs and apt-get didn't know about that and let me know either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 23/04/2008, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net> wrote:
> Check this out, I downgrade to sarge which was the highest form of sarge > before everything moved along into etch and later lenny. The aptitude > package was uninstalled and so I try repeating that operation where bsdgames > and emacs21 get installed together. Emacs21 has aptitude as a dependency > and cannot install without aptitude being preinstalled and happy. If that > problem never did get remedied (aptitude required to install emacs) then > there's no point in my taking any of this any further. For one thing > aptitude ought to be a pre-dependency of emacs and apt-get didn't know about > that and let me know either. I can't understand why Emacs would depend on one package manager over another. Unless I'm missing the bleeding obvious. Adrian -- 24x7x365 != 24x7x52 Stupid or bad maths? <erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 2008-04-23 11:53 +0200, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Check this out, I downgrade to sarge which was the highest form of > sarge before everything moved along into etch and later lenny. The > aptitude package was uninstalled and so I try repeating that operation > where bsdgames and emacs21 get installed together. Emacs21 has > aptitude as a dependency and cannot install without aptitude being > preinstalled and happy. Very strange. Given that most users still prefer apt-get over aptitude for installing packages, I don't see how this could be true. > If that problem never did get remedied > (aptitude required to install emacs) then there's no point in my > taking any of this any further. For one thing aptitude ought to be a > pre-dependency of emacs and apt-get didn't know about that and let me > know either. If aptitude is really required to install emacs21 (which I doubt), then that's a bug, period. Note that (according to popcon stats) aptitude is only installed on 98% of all systems, and a few of the remaining might have emacs21 installed. You can also be assured that I installed emacs21 on woody long before aptitude. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Emacs21 has aptitude as a dependency and cannot install without > aptitude being preinstalled and happy. Unless it's a pre-dependency, you could install both at the same time, not one before the other. Run apt-cache emacs21 and show us the results. This will point the version with the hypotetical dependency and list all dependencies. -- Nirvana? That's the place where the powers that be and their friends hang out. -- Zonker Harris Eduardo M KALINOWSKI ekalin@gmail.com http://move.to/hpkb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:53:15AM -0500, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net> was heard to say:
> Check this out, I downgrade to sarge which was the highest form of sarge > before everything moved along into etch and later lenny. The aptitude > package was uninstalled and so I try repeating that operation where > bsdgames and emacs21 get installed together. Emacs21 has aptitude as a > dependency and cannot install without aptitude being preinstalled and > happy. If that problem never did get remedied (aptitude required to > install emacs) then there's no point in my taking any of this any > further. For one thing aptitude ought to be a pre-dependency of emacs and > apt-get didn't know about that and let me know either. Huh? emacs doesn't depend on aptitude at all. The strongest relationship is a Suggests: daniel@alpaca:~$ aptitude why emacs21 aptitude i A emacs21 Depends emacs21-bin-common (= 21.4a+1-5.3) i A emacs21-bin-common Depends emacs21-common (= 21.4a+1-5.3) i A emacs21-common Depends dpkg (>= 1.9.0) i A dpkg Suggests apt i A apt Suggests aptitude | synaptic | gnome-apt | wajig I don't know what version of Debian you're talking about, but I would be aghast if any version of Emacs depended on any apt program (the dpkg dependency is only there because dpkg contains install-info). Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:25:47 +1000, Adrian Levi wrote:
> > I can't understand why Emacs would depend on one package manager over > another. Unless I'm missing the bleeding obvious. Well, it *is* emacs. Maybe it has an operating mode where it acts as a front-end to aptitude? :-0 -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:32:30PM +0000, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:25:47 +1000, Adrian Levi wrote: > > > > I can't understand why Emacs would depend on one package manager over > > another. Unless I'm missing the bleeding obvious. > > Well, it *is* emacs. Maybe it has an operating mode where it acts as a > front-end to aptitude? > since one needs a package manager to run their operating system... and how else would they expect to install an editor in that OS? /me ducks and runs back to my emacs... A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFID/HLaIeIEqwil4YRAiSvAJ0cIfW6aTctJkFq3FGkhgvWhANW9QCg 1CbK W2cQvFibT3xhnwPzX8mEosg= =N8wI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|