PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Serveur - Sécurité et techniques > linux.debian.user > Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org.

Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 27/09/2007, 13h10   #1
Ron Johnson
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/27/07 01:58, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> [snip]
>> To my mind the fact that I said it would be nice to have versioning that
>> worked with OOo, Freemind and Writer's Cafe/Storylines implied that OOo,
>> Freemind and Writer's Cafe/Storylines were not on the table for replacement.

>
> You are aware that this mail of yours is the first and only one in the
> whole thread that ever mentioned "Freemind" or "Storylines"? You never
> stated that these were your requirements.


His original post *did* mention them.

>> Of course in writing this explanation for you I do find it mildly amusing
>> that lots of people seemed to have latched onto versioning as an absolute
>> requirement, feel obligated to change one of the tools I am using to fit that
>> perception yet have not offered up any replacement tools for Freemind or
>> Storylines.

>
> I find it very amusing, that you find it amusing that other people can't
> read your mind. It amazing how efficient technology is nowadays in
> carrying your ideas quickly over the Atlantic; all you have to do is
> this: type them into an e-mail. Don't expect that they float without
> this little effort. ;-)



- From the original post, 08/22/07 15:26 UTC:
> o handle non-text data as well as some textual data. The main
> file that is going to change most often is an OOo document (odt).
> I'll also be storing any related files including Mindmap files
> (mm) and Writer's Cafe files.


- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+43/S9HxQb37XmcRAhfoAJ0QXHDPSJQ9rhKDCROXPQ/Xy6HPrACg6hTS
fvjbIlNx3CQINKuHfZXQsmM=
=6iRa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/09/2007, 14h00   #2
Douglas A. Tutty
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:03:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:

> - From the original post, 08/22/07 15:26 UTC:
> > o handle non-text data as well as some textual data. The main
> > file that is going to change most often is an OOo document (odt).


Here we have the source of some of the confusion. He's already specfied
odt _and_ some non-textual data. This implies something other than
simply some italics.

Since we don't know what type of non-text data, we don't know if it
needs versioning too or how to do it. We've already determined that we
don't know how to version odt.

So: if versioning isn't required, then what is the point of this thread?
If versioning is required, then odt isn't a possibility and people have
recommended LaTex as a suitable alternative that can incorporate
"non-text data" if that means graphics or e.g. formulae.

The only other solution to the versioning of something that you can't
diff would be a full-fledged database with full logging. Check out the
most recent version, edit it, then post it back as a new record. Since
these are files, they'd be 'huge' items in the database.

I don't know. I've never used Word or OO. Prior to LaTex it was lout;
both text markup. Prior to that it was WordPerfect on OS/2 that did its
own versioning, including graphics (since they were vector graphics, the
vertices were what was stored).

Doug.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/09/2007, 16h40   #3
Johannes Wiedersich
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 09/27/07 01:58, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> To my mind the fact that I said it would be nice to have versioning that
>>> worked with OOo, Freemind and Writer's Cafe/Storylines implied that OOo,
>>> Freemind and Writer's Cafe/Storylines were not on the table for replacement.

>> You are aware that this mail of yours is the first and only one in the
>> whole thread that ever mentioned "Freemind" or "Storylines"? You never
>> stated that these were your requirements.

>
> His original post *did* mention them.


Sorry for this lapse of mine. I searched the thread for the terms
"Freemind" and "Storylines" as they appear in the later mail. In the
first mail they were called "Mindmap" and "Writer's Cafe" instead.

Johannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+78eC1NzPRl9qEURAvxKAJ9apiZirtgY5Wt/z34+mMza0VmhLQCfaoqs
stjxVyELvM9Hn648WZCBXts=
=jNoj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/09/2007, 18h00   #4
Steve Lamb
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Sorry for this lapse of mine. I searched the thread for the terms
> "Freemind" and "Storylines" as they appear in the later mail. In the
> first mail they were called "Mindmap" and "Writer's Cafe" instead.


To explain I mistakenly called Freemind Mindmap as it is mindmapping
software. Storylines is a portion of a suite of software to an author
keep track of the elements of fictional writing which is called Writer's Cafe.
It would be what Writer is to OOo.

--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG+9Gbel/srYtumcURAuXgAKC0Znkksw3jvaIBooR9E6FS2pKhWACeKc4Z
yuFy9oJ61ouaEp7fPusUs7I=
=2S6B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/09/2007, 18h00   #5
Steve Lamb
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:03:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> - From the original post, 08/22/07 15:26 UTC:
>> > o handle non-text data as well as some textual data. The main
>> > file that is going to change most often is an OOo document (odt).

>
> Here we have the source of some of the confusion. He's already specfied
> odt _and_ some non-textual data. This implies something other than
> simply some italics.


> Since we don't know what type of non-text data, we don't know if it
> needs versioning too or how to do it. We've already determined that we
> don't know how to version odt.


You snipped the relevant portion of that requirement. Freemind (stated
mistakenly as Mindmap) and Storylines files were the examples I gave for
non-textual. I started out the thread thinking that OOo could be versioned
since I knew it was nothing more than an XML document. I did not know atthe
time it was compressed which would render it non-text to a versioning software.

I was quickly disabused of that misconception and was perfectly fine to
not have versioning via normal textual means. In fact I then switched my
thinking to how to get OOo to save uncompressed or have the versioning
software to handle OOo documents. But if I can't get it versioned that'sno
big deal.

--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG+9Euel/srYtumcURAtSSAKCU0daZQFQoEF4mMkhTVCJnfD5QEgCgl1GD
aFEXaeenzXi6vnoL++l/EN0=
=CVWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 28/09/2007, 05h40   #6
Dave Thayer
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX (Was: Tool for document management)

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I was quickly disabused of that misconception and was perfectly fine to
> not have versioning via normal textual means. In fact I then switched my
> thinking to how to get OOo to save uncompressed or have the versioning
> software to handle OOo documents. But if I can't get it versioned that's no
> big deal.
>


This guy has a makefile which handles ODF packing and unpacking for
use in a versioning system:

http://clarencedang.blogspot.com/200...ontrolled.html
<http://preview.tinyurl.com/37o2bz>

HTH

dt

--
Dave Thayer | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the
Denver, Colorado USA | author is right there, in the room talking to
dave@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read
| good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 03h51.


Édité par : vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,13373 seconds with 14 queries