|
|
|
|
||||||
| linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be
configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +0000, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be > configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail > transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. sudo dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config Adn this is waaaaaay less complex than anything else I've seen for smarthost! This is also useful, even for non-GMail configuration: http://wiki.debian.org/GmailAndExim4 HTH. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/07 02:26, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +0000, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be >> configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail >> transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. > > sudo dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config > > Adn this is waaaaaay less complex than anything else I've seen for > smarthost! postfix is also easy to config using dpkg-reconfigure for smarthost. Anyone who says that "sendmail less complex than ..." refuses to learn new things. > This is also useful, even for non-GMail configuration: > > http://wiki.debian.org/GmailAndExim4 - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5QZMS9HxQb37XmcRAqO3AKDmDnQFfr92QyAtkRqu7x Nfr9xeewCg7kWo sTKYZUc5dr8vwvJdMGz0nlY= =adTi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Thanks for the exim4 smart host . I would almost go with postfix
except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any encryption for doing authentication on their end. It's probably what most internet service providers are now doing since ssl and cram md5 and tls are a hassle for them to set up and maintain on their ends. On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/10/07 02:26, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +0000, Jude DaShiell wrote: >>> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be >>> configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail >>> transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. >> >> sudo dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config >> >> Adn this is waaaaaay less complex than anything else I've seen for >> smarthost! > > postfix is also easy to config using dpkg-reconfigure for smarthost. > > Anyone who says that "sendmail less complex than ..." refuses to > learn new things. > >> This is also useful, even for non-GMail configuration: >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/GmailAndExim4 > > > - -- > Ron Johnson, Jr. > Jefferson LA USA > > Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. > Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFG5QZMS9HxQb37XmcRAqO3AKDmDnQFfr92QyAtkRqu7x Nfr9xeewCg7kWo > sTKYZUc5dr8vwvJdMGz0nlY= > =adTi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Thanks for the exim4 smart host . I would almost go with postfix > except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any > encryption for doing authentication on their end. Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee, but are you saying that postfix does not support smarthost authentication? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5SiSS9HxQb37XmcRAjMDAKCSlhAnRrqUSFaI4UCV3J z9ompJswCgyvGx hiUqqIja2vXA7RAvOVZYUUY= =0tFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 2007-09-10, Kumar Appaiah <akumar@iitm.ac.in> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +0000, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be >> configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail >> transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. > > sudo dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config > > Adn this is waaaaaay less complex than anything else I've seen for > smarthost! > This is probably common knowledge, but I recently discovered the -u flag. This is handy, since I routinely use three different smarthosts. So when I plug my laptop into a different network, I switch the comments in my /etc/exim4/update.conf.conf file to point to the right smarthost: dc_smarthost='smtp1.ns.sympatico.ca' #dc_smarthost='smtp.smu.ca' #dc_smarthost='mailhost.mcgill.ca' and then run dpkg-reconfigure -u exim4-config This way, dpkg-reconfigure just switches the smarthost, without making me answer a bunch of questions about things that don't change. At some point I suppose I should write a script that will check which network I'm on and invoke dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config with the right options, but I'm not sure how to do that yet - any hints welcome! Cheers, Tyler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:19:51PM +0000, Tyler Smith wrote:
> On 2007-09-10, Kumar Appaiah <akumar@iitm.ac.in> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:42:32AM +0000, Jude DaShiell wrote: > >> If using exim4 and it's necessary to use a smarthoast where can that be > >> configured? I find sendmail less complex than exim4 and all other mail > >> transport agents I've tried less complex than the pair of them. > > > > sudo dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config > > > > Adn this is waaaaaay less complex than anything else I've seen for > > smarthost! > > > > This is probably common knowledge, but I recently discovered the -u > flag. This is handy, since I routinely use three different smarthosts. > So when I plug my laptop into a different network, I switch the > comments in my /etc/exim4/update.conf.conf file to point to the right > smarthost: > > dc_smarthost='smtp1.ns.sympatico.ca' > #dc_smarthost='smtp.smu.ca' > #dc_smarthost='mailhost.mcgill.ca' > > and then run > > dpkg-reconfigure -u exim4-config Postfix can have sender dependent smarthosts: in /etc/postfix/main.cf I have sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_relay and then in /etc/postfix/sender_relay first_user@host.local [mail.first_isp.com] second_user@host.local [mail.second_isp.com] Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5aQIqJyztHCFm9kRAnkvAJ90bFtl8xMNWb5Alxgcs0 CC7IPK6gCePkLA jj6vmL7ectVGNACjku+DDP0= =JfP7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
>
> At some point I suppose I should write a script that will check which > network I'm on and invoke dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config with the right > options, but I'm not sure how to do that yet - any hints welcome! > whereami [1] and expect [2] [1] http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/whereami [2] http://expect.nist.gov/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I used postfix for a very short time with a smarthost that at that time
didn't require authentication so had no need to check out what capabilities postfix might or might not have had at that time with respect to smarthost authentication. On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> Thanks for the exim4 smart host . I would almost go with postfix >> except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any >> encryption for doing authentication on their end. > > Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee, but are you saying that > postfix does not support smarthost authentication? > > - -- > Ron Johnson, Jr. > Jefferson LA USA > > Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. > Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFG5SiSS9HxQb37XmcRAjMDAKCSlhAnRrqUSFaI4UCV3J z9ompJswCgyvGx > hiUqqIja2vXA7RAvOVZYUUY= > =0tFV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/07 18:23, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I used postfix for a very short time with a smarthost that at that time > didn't require authentication so had no need to check out what > capabilities postfix might or might not have had at that time with > respect to smarthost authentication. Then what did you mean in your 09/10/07 04:27 comment? (And remember that top-posting is rude.) > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> Thanks for the exim4 smart host . I would almost go with postfix >> except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any >> encryption for doing authentication on their end. > > Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee, but are you saying that > postfix does not support smarthost authentication? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5yWXS9HxQb37XmcRAqW1AKC1bLsbU6a0deQQtmVXAq BNjcHx7wCfZLfB mHQIIwULOWutBOB08i4Ab1Y= =aAwl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
What I meant was that if postfix had the capability to do smarthost
authentication I didn't know about the syntax for it or where any such syntax would have been stored in configuration files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|