|
|
|
|
||||||
| linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I'm using Postfix with Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, etc. I what to use
RBL lookups to stop spam, but I am unsure as to whether to have Postfix perform the lookup or Spamassassin? I know that if I enable it on Postfix, those emails will be rejected and possibly legitimate emails as well, but if I have Spamassassin perform it, my mail server will be accepting a lot more email which will be more taxing on the server... Your opinions and insight are greatly appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Saturday 18 August 2007 14:51, Anthony M Simonelli wrote:
> I'm using Postfix with Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, etc. I what to use > RBL lookups to stop spam, but I am unsure as to whether to have Postfix > perform the lookup or Spamassassin? I know that if I enable it on > Postfix, those emails will be rejected and possibly legitimate emails as > well, but if I have Spamassassin perform it, my mail server will be > accepting a lot more email which will be more taxing on the server... If your server is heavily loaded then you might want to do RBL lookups in Postfix. However, if you can handle the load then deferring RBL lookups until you run spamassassin out of procmail allows users to override RBL with white lists when needed. We use defer-if-reject/reject-unknown-client, reject-non-fqdn-sender, reject-unlisted-sender, and defer-if-reject/reject-unknown-sender-domain in Postfix which block a lot of the spam, but we don't lookup RBLs until spamassassin runs from procmail. If you only have one user, or otherwise only have one spam policy, then you can run spamassassin out of postfix instead of procmail. --Mike Bird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Saturday 18 August 2007 14:51, Anthony M Simonelli wrote:
> I'm using Postfix with Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, etc. I what to use > RBL lookups to stop spam, but I am unsure as to whether to have Postfix > perform the lookup or Spamassassin? I know that if I enable it on > Postfix, those emails will be rejected and possibly legitimate emails as > well, but if I have Spamassassin perform it, my mail server will be > accepting a lot more email which will be more taxing on the server... If your server is heavily loaded then you might want to do RBL lookups in Postfix. However, if you can handle the load then deferring RBL lookups until you run spamassassin out of procmail allows users to override RBL with white lists when needed. We use defer-if-reject/reject-unknown-client, reject-non-fqdn-sender, reject-unlisted-sender, and defer-if-reject/reject-unknown-sender-domain in Postfix which block a lot of the spam, but we don't lookup RBLs until spamassassin runs from procmail. If you only have one user, or otherwise only have one spam policy, then you can run spamassassin out of postfix instead of procmail. --Mike Bird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Anthony M Simonelli wrote:
> I'm using Postfix with Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, etc. I what to use > RBL lookups to stop spam, but I am unsure as to whether to have Postfix > perform the lookup or Spamassassin? I know that if I enable it on > Postfix, those emails will be rejected and possibly legitimate emails as > well, but if I have Spamassassin perform it, my mail server will be > accepting a lot more email which will be more taxing on the server... > > Your opinions and insight are greatly appreciated. You have a good handle on things. I run "safe" RBLs in postfix because rejections there are rejected. I run less safe RBLs in spamassassin just to add points. It is a compromise. Now you are going to ask what are the "safe" RBLs? I am not going to step into that one. ;-) Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|