|
|
|
|
||||||
| linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this:
[root@mainserver:root]$ aptitude show lame Package: lame State: not a real package This was after trying to install it just by the name "lame." Then I did this: [root@mainserver:root]$ aptitude search lame p flamethrower - Multicast file distribution utility c glame - versatile audio processor v lame - p systemimager-server-flamethrowerd - SystemImager boot binaries for i386 client nodes p toolame - MPEG-1 layer 2 audio encoder (Extra spaces removed.) Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that create a conflict with Debian's social contract? Do I have to go out of the repositories to add lame? Thanks! Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi Hal,
On 7/26/07, Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> wrote: I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: > > <Snip> > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > > Do I have to go out of the repositories to add lame? > Before you can install lame, you have to add this line to your /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org etch main (you may replace etch by stable of course). Then do an aptitude update and first install the debian-multimedia-keyring: aptitude install debian-multimedia-keyring Then aptitude install lame. That's all. Manon. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi Hal,
On 7/26/07, Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> wrote: I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: > > <Snip> > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > > Do I have to go out of the repositories to add lame? > Before you can install lame, you have to add this line to your /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org etch main (you may replace etch by stable of course). Then do an aptitude update and first install the debian-multimedia-keyring: aptitude install debian-multimedia-keyring Then aptitude install lame. That's all. Manon. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Thursday 26 July 2007, Manon Metten wrote:
> Hi Hal, > > On 7/26/07, Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> wrote: > > I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: > > <Snip> > > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > > > > Do I have to go out of the repositories to add lame? > > Before you can install lame, you have to add this line to your > /etc/apt/sources.list: > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org etch main > (you may replace etch by stable of course). > > Then do an aptitude update and first install the > debian-multimedia-keyring: aptitude install debian-multimedia-keyring > > Then aptitude install lame. That's all. > > Manon. Is this fairly new? I had never had a problem before, but I may not have been trying to do anything with multimedia on Sarge before. I tried this, but used the line: deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sarge main aptitude could not get the Packages file from that source. I checked: http://www.debian-multimedia.org and there's a note to use: deb http://mirror.home-dn.net/debian-multimedia sarge main instead if you're still on Sarge. I've tried that a couple times to be sure, but aptitude still can't get the Packages file. I downloaded debian-multimedia-keyring and installed it with dpkg. Then when I did an update, there was no problem reading the Packages file. From there, installing lame worked perfectly. Thanks for the on that! Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> Manon Metten wrote: > > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > > > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? The mp3 encoder is patented outside of the context of the software license for that particular program. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3#Lic..._patent_issues > > Before you can install lame, you have to add this line to your > > /etc/apt/sources.list: > Is this fairly new? I had never had a problem before, but I may not > have been trying to do anything with multimedia on Sarge before. This has been true thoughout the history of Sarge. And Sarge released June 2005. It has subsequently been replaced with Etch released April 2007. You really should consider upgrading to Etch at least before Lenny releases. :-) That depot has been moved around to various places over the last few years. It seems to be at a permanent home now at www.debian-multimedia.org. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Uh, just ignore that other response. I forgot which e-mail was still on
the screen when I hit "reply." It's just one of those days... Hal On Thursday 26 July 2007, Hal Vaughan wrote: > Thanks, everyone, for the suggestions and offers. I've contacted > someone who will be swapping routers with me tomorrow. I had several > other responses, but I didn't want to say anything until I had > confirmed we could swap. > > Thanks again! > > Hal > > On Thursday 26 July 2007, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: > > > > [root@mainserver:root]$ aptitude show lame > > Package: lame > > State: not a real package > > > > This was after trying to install it just by the name "lame." Then > > I did this: > > > > [root@mainserver:root]$ aptitude search lame > > p flamethrower - Multicast file distribution utility > > c glame - versatile audio processor > > v lame - > > p systemimager-server-flamethrowerd - SystemImager boot binaries > > for i386 client nodes > > p toolame - MPEG-1 layer 2 audio encoder > > > > (Extra spaces removed.) > > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > > > > Do I have to go out of the repositories to add lame? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Thursday 26 July 2007, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote: > > Manon Metten wrote: > > > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does > > > > that create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > > The mp3 encoder is patented outside of the context of the software > license for that particular program. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3#Lic..._patent_issues > > > > Before you can install lame, you have to add this line to your > > > /etc/apt/sources.list: > > > > Is this fairly new? I had never had a problem before, but I may > > not have been trying to do anything with multimedia on Sarge > > before. > > This has been true thoughout the history of Sarge. And Sarge > released June 2005. It has subsequently been replaced with Etch > released April 2007. You really should consider upgrading to Etch at > least before Lenny releases. :-) I will be upgrading to Etch, but I've been so busy with the aftermath of a death in the family a few months before Etch went stable and a heavy programming load for the past 2 months, that I haven't even had time to check up on what kind of "gotchas" I need to be aware of. I know there's an issue with MySQL and permissions with an easy work around, but other than that, I want to have time to check out known issues before I upgrade a server. On the other hand, what's the expected release date for Lenny going Stable? With Etch going Stable in April, I figure I still have another 8 - 9 months before Lenny is stable. :-) > That depot has been moved around to various places over the last > few years. It seems to be at a permanent home now at > www.debian-multimedia.org. They're saying for Sarge to use one of their mirrors. I guess I can change that when I upgrade to Etch. Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I know there's an issue with MySQL and permissions with an easy work > around, but other than that, I want to have time to check out known > issues before I upgrade a server. Wise plan. In fact setting up a Sarge machine as a victim for upgrade testing to Etch is a good idea. For servers the upgrade for me has gone quite easily. For desktops the biggest problem has been the name changes for many web browser plugins and also the movement of GNU FDL licensed documentation into non-free. This means I have had to add non-free to my sources where this was not previously needed and also needed to specifically install many of the now non-free documentation packages that were split out. > On the other hand, what's the expected release date for Lenny going > Stable? With Etch going Stable in April, I figure I still have another > 8 - 9 months before Lenny is stable. :-) You are an optimist thinking 8-9 months! I think you have plenty of time well past that. Perhaps I should have said before security upgrades for Sarge are discontinued. That will almost certainly happen before Lenny releases. :-) Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Thursday 26 July 2007, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I know there's an issue with MySQL and permissions with an easy > > work around, but other than that, I want to have time to check out > > known issues before I upgrade a server. > > Wise plan. In fact setting up a Sarge machine as a victim for > upgrade testing to Etch is a good idea. That's a possibility. I'd duplicate the list of packages on the server and test it that way. Of course, I couldn't do a *real* test unless I made sure all the programs were in use, which would mean a drop in replacement, which ain't going to happen unless I can replace a mostly full 300GB RAID (and most of that is my ripped CD collection -- just got a Squeezebox and installed Slimserver so I could listen to them outside the office). > For servers the upgrade for me has gone quite easily. For desktops > the biggest problem has been the name changes for many web browser > plugins and also the movement of GNU FDL licensed documentation into > non-free. This means I have had to add non-free to my sources where > this was not previously needed and also needed to specifically > install many of the now non-free documentation packages that were > split out. In some ways server management can be much easier than a desktop. I'm rarely adding anything and once it's stabilized, there's not much that changes. I'm not worried about docs or anything like that on the server because I can use them on my workstation, which is Ubuntu because I like newer versions of eye candy. > > On the other hand, what's the expected release date for Lenny going > > Stable? With Etch going Stable in April, I figure I still have > > another 8 - 9 months before Lenny is stable. :-) > > You are an optimist thinking 8-9 months! I think you have plenty of > time well past that. Perhaps I should have said before security > upgrades for Sarge are discontinued. That will almost certainly > happen before Lenny releases. :-) I said 8-9 months because I was being diplomatic and didn't want to offend any of the few DDs left on the list! I figure I'll get the main server, which does file, print, dns, and audio serving (and a few other things like that) first, since that's less complex and all the services are easy to replace. The other is my work system, which is also a development system for the business (I can't afford to do it on 2 separate systems) and that would be a mess if things didn't upgrade smoothly. Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi Hal,
On 7/26/07, Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> wrote: On Thursday 26 July 2007, Manon Metten wrote: > > I tried this, but used the line: > > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sarge main > > aptitude could not get the Packages file from that source. I checked: > > http://www.debian-multimedia.org > > and there's a note to use: > > deb http://mirror.home-dn.net/debian-multimedia sarge main > > instead if you're still on Sarge. I've tried that a couple times to be > sure, but aptitude still can't get the Packages file. I downloaded > debian-multimedia-keyring and installed it with dpkg. Then when I did > an update, there was no problem reading the Packages file. From there, > installing lame worked perfectly. I'm sorry I referred to etch. I looked up in my logbook how I installed lame a while ago and in the meantime I totally forgot you were using sarge. Nevertheless good to know you've managed to install lame. Don't know if you're interested, but below is the high quality setting I always use when creating my own mp3's: lame --clipdetect --vbr-new -V 0 --add-id3v2 -q2 --lowpass 20kHz --ta "Artist" --tt "Song" --tl "Album" --ty "Year" ifp ofp Manon. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sat July 28 2007 17:29, 2g wrote:
> at their site > only > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main > is recommended for unstable > even though they have > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main > and > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main > maybe i should just try but > afraid of something get broken > > someone doing well with > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org unstable main My laptop is running unstable with quite a few packages from d-m. I haven't had any problems. If you are running sid I would use the unstable branch of d-m. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
at their site
only deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main is recommended for unstable even though they have deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main and deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main maybe i should just try but afraid of something get broken someone doing well with deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org unstable main ? tia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
################################################## ####################
ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because I have the last 1 day of my military service and can not reply in short delays. ################################################## #################### Am 2007-07-26 13:17:25, schrieb Hal Vaughan: > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > "lame" can not distributed by debian, so you can find it on <http://www.multimedia-debian.org/>. (I hope it is right since I do not nose non-free stuff) Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGrc+uC0FPBMSS+BIRAkxPAKCM/n2SfxKCRJ68y3BUh9w4T4mcwgCcDiM3 1muwoB70HoBu0B32EQZwlIQ= =fwPr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
################################################## ####################
ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because I have the last 1 day of my military service and can not reply in short delays. ################################################## #################### Am 2007-07-26 13:17:25, schrieb Hal Vaughan: > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > "lame" can not distributed by debian, so you can find it on <http://www.multimedia-debian.org/>. (I hope it is right since I do not nose non-free stuff) Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGrc+uC0FPBMSS+BIRAkxPAKCM/n2SfxKCRJ68y3BUh9w4T4mcwgCcDiM3 1muwoB70HoBu0B32EQZwlIQ= =fwPr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|