|
|
|
|
||||||
| linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
What, on your opinion, can be done better in Debian BTS, reportbug?
Why do you think it's better than current approach (if exists)? What can you do to with that? Some related contex: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <http://mid.gmane.org/slrnfa13fp.anq.for.gmane@flower.upol.cz> <http://mid.gmane.org/1185112075.3997.41.camel@tomoyo> <http://mid.gmane.org/E1ICht4-0005N0-K4@flower> #420361 <http://mid.gmane.org/20070721130033.GB18680@dario.dodds.net> #422085 __ Thanks. ____ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> What, on your opinion, can be done better in Debian BTS, reportbug?
> > Why do you think it's better than current approach (if exists)? > > What can you do to with that? > 1) In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ , I would like to see an option to search just within the title of the bug reports. 2) If I report a bug, I would automatically like to be subscribed to it so that I receive all the future communications. Currently let's say I report a bug. Then if the maintainer replies only to the bug report, I have no way of knowing about it unless I manually subscribe to that bug number. Manually subscribing to each bug report you submit is tiresome. 3) If I report a bug, I want to see it immediately in bugs.debian.org and not after some 20 minutes delay. (that's way it works with other bug reporting systems, ex:- kde, gcc bug reporting systems) Those are my only complaints. Otherwise BTS is just great. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> 1) In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ , I would like to see an option to search > just within the title of the bug reports. In my experience, the titles of bug reports are often useless. There is, however, a full-text search of the BTS available here: http://merkel.debian.org/~don/cgi/search.cgi > 2) If I report a bug, I would automatically like to be subscribed to it so > that I receive all the future communications. Currently let's say I report > a bug. Then if the maintainer replies only to the bug report, I have no way > of knowing about it unless I manually subscribe to that bug number. > Manually subscribing to each bug report you submit is tiresome. I agree. > 3) If I report a bug, I want to see it immediately in bugs.debian.org and > not after some 20 minutes delay. (that's way it works with other bug > reporting systems, ex:- kde, gcc bug reporting systems) Well, it used to be an average of a 15 minute delay. Now the average is 2 minutes. -- see shy jo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGqOXld8HHehbQuO8RAj23AKDsLkZuSKdAqktdpcwh4j Zr4EmPZACfWqw0 rfg3qHNpJpCvlLvNGyfq8ws= =my69 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote:
> What, on your opinion, can be done better in Debian BTS, reportbug? 1)I agree with kamaraju (sp?) that submitter should be automatically subscribed to the bug, or even better, given the option to subscribe from within reportbug at submittal time. 2)also, I'd love to see a final option to change the From: address in reportbug as various times I've been an idiot and completed a whole report not realising that I had a bogus From:... but I can get pretty stupid sometimes... > > Why do you think it's better than current approach (if exists)? 1)it places the burden of subcribing on the submitter, but makes it dead-stupid easy to subscribe (you could bypass any confirmation email etc...) and takes work load of keeping track of CC's off the maintainer. 2) theres already a stupid_mode in the code, so why not more of the same? ![]() > > What can you do to with that? I don't know, maybe hack reportbug to include this option, but I haven't looked at it closely. > > > Some related contex: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > <http://mid.gmane.org/slrnfa13fp.anq.for.gmane@flower.upol.cz> heh. I like that one... A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGqN6oaIeIEqwil4YRAhGlAKC7mlyI4I/xRhenGzBgWgEVAGrapgCeKAxL LXogzv+owUbb1mnvjDO8A/0= =+Iki -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:49:29AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote: > > What, on your opinion, can be done better in Debian BTS, reportbug? > > 1)I agree with kamaraju (sp?) that submitter should be automatically > subscribed to the bug, or even better, given the option to subscribe > from within reportbug at submittal time. Or making the subscription as easy as replying to the ACK mail (without and additional ACK, as the reply already verifies that I'm not a computer). Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGrKfCqJyztHCFm9kRAiLMAKCpPTB1OgoLHB0VRmwYpD 6Nbm9m2wCggKBa TvSojtssKOaD/LftMFjAUew= =0iGG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|