Hello folks,

I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release", that is
Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release". Now it shows 522
bugs for Etch. Am I missing something?

--
Szia:
Nyizsa.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
http://www.bluebottle.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
> It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release", that is
> Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release". Now it shows 522
> bugs for Etch. Am I missing something?
Yes. The page does not show the word 'etch'. Etch is the current stable.
Lenny is the next stable. If you look at the graph, the bottom line dips
near zero at april or may, that was the release of Etch.
--
| .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: |
| : :' : The Universal |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/|
| `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and |
| `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 |
| my keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
|join the new debian-community.org to Debian! |
|_______ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed _______|

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGdhe1v8UcC1qRZVMRAkhiAJ9TjUagPdE28TE09gWYRZ s2aGUj1ACgm0F1
52x+M3rQgNEjulYB9730WHg=
=Fhr3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:52 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:27:18 -0400
> Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
> > > It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release",
> > > that is Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release". Now
> > > it shows 522 bugs for Etch. Am I missing something?
> > Yes. The page does not show the word 'etch'. Etch is the current
> > stable. Lenny is the next stable. If you look at the graph, the
> > bottom line dips near zero at april or may, that was the release of
> > Etch.
>
> Yes, that bottom line jumped up to 520 recently. Also, 520 bugs are
> shown for the current stable release. And we agree on that is Etch,

I disagree! From the above it sounds like the graph is for next stable,
which prior to Apr/May was etch but is now lenny. It's not etch only

> whether or not the word "Etch" is shown on the page.
>
> --
> Szia:
> Nyizsa.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
> http://www.bluebottle.com
>
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 16:03 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:41:28 +0100
> michael <cs@networkingnewsletter.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:52 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:27:18 -0400
> > > Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
> > > > > Hello folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
> > > > > It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release",
> > > > > that is Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release".
> > > > > Now it shows 522 bugs for Etch. Am I missing something?
> > > > Yes. The page does not show the word 'etch'. Etch is the current
> > > > stable. Lenny is the next stable. If you look at the graph, the
> > > > bottom line dips near zero at april or may, that was the release
> > > > of Etch.
> > >
> > > Yes, that bottom line jumped up to 520 recently. Also, 520 bugs are
> > > shown for the current stable release. And we agree on that is Etch,
> >
> > I disagree! From the above it sounds like the graph is for next
> > stable, which prior to Apr/May was etch but is now lenny. It's not
> > etch only
>
> Have you folks actually visited the page?

I hadn't (as I thought I made clear!)


> There are three lines showing
> bug counts:
> RED line: Total number of release-critical bugs
> GREEN line: Number concerning the next release
> BLUE line: Number concerning the current stable release

ah, the blue line, that doesn't ring any bell for when I've looked
before...

> Red and green lines have local minimums at June 2005 (Sarge was
> released) and April 2007 (Etch was released). The BLUE line (the one I
> was talking about) started in April 2007 with 8 bugs. Yesterday it went
> up to 522. And "Number concerning the current stable release: 522".

and yes, I concur it says 522 R_C bugs for current stable


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org