|
|
|
|
||||||
| linux.debian.user debian-user@lists.debian.org. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hello all,
Running Etch amd64. I just found this in my logwatch: --------------------- iptables firewall Begin ------------------------ Listed by source hosts: Rejected 4 packets on interface ppp0 From 209.29.44.21 - 4 packets To 207.246.138.125 - 1 packet Service: 81 (tcp/81) (Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT - 1 packetTo 207.246.138.137 - 1 packet Service: 81 (tcp/81) (Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT - 1 packetTo 207.246.138.139 - 1 packet Service: 81 (tcp/81) (Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT - 1 packetTo 207.246.138.140 - 1 packet Service: 81 (tcp/81) (Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT - 1 packet---------------------- iptables firewall End ------------------------- And this is what I found in /var/log/syslog: Apr 10 22:38:10 titan kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT:IN= OUT=ppp0 SRC=209.29.44.21 DST=207.246.138.125 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=34903 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=54446 DPT=81 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Apr 10 22:38:10 titan kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT:IN= OUT=ppp0 SRC=209.29.44.21 DST=207.246.138.137 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=31888 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=54278 DPT=81 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Apr 10 22:38:10 titan kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT:IN= OUT=ppp0 SRC=209.29.44.21 DST=207.246.138.139 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=38355 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=50574 DPT=81 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Apr 10 22:38:10 titan kernel: Shorewall:fw2net:REJECT:IN= OUT=ppp0 SRC=209.29.44.21 DST=207.246.138.140 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=20562 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=53783 DPT=81 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 It seems to have been something from my box (fw) out to the net. I'm on dialup. I don't see port 81 in /etc/services. Any ideas? Thanks Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wednesday, 11.04.2007 at 08:28 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> I'm on dialup. I don't see port 81 in /etc/services. *unsure* I vaguely remember that Smoothwall used this port for remote access, I think. (i.e. you could connect to your own Smoothwall installation on that port to configure it. Dave. -- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - davee@sungate.co.uk - jabber: davee@jabber.org All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGHNyKnhBnac0o2pIRAr3nAJ9xcLYsMOrB5BxjHRTBCt kdHGGA1wCg/o11 gtVYfa3ZLXGywO27SuLx2Kg= =xzts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:03:06PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > *unsure* I vaguely remember that Smoothwall used this port for remote > access, I think. (i.e. you could connect to your own Smoothwall > installation on that port to configure it. > Reviewing what I was doing on the box last night: aptitude was [still is ] in the midst of downloading a packageKonqueror kept not responding but; KDE kept Konking Out (requiring Ctrl-Alt-BS) (Konqueror works OK when accessed via SSH from other box) I suppose its possible that in the process of Konking out it made connection attempts on the wrong port. I'm not really interested in fixing KDE; I think I'll be going back to XFCE but using K apps. So should I forget about the port 81 attempt? I don't see any evidence on the box that there's been a compromise. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Dave Ewart schrieb:
> On Wednesday, 11.04.2007 at 08:28 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > >> I'm on dialup. I don't see port 81 in /etc/services. >> > > *unsure* I vaguely remember that Smoothwall used this port for remote > access, I think. (i.e. you could connect to your own Smoothwall > installation on that port to configure it. > > Dave. > According to http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers it is a service called "HOSTS2 Name Server". However, I got no clue what that is. Usually an http service would listen to it. Using 81 as "spare" port. Greetings Björn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGHOD7Y7BnBH/xFu8RAj6YAJ44TRHziW981Z+sJfTJDIbtNUtcFQCgjMyQ 3toi+RgcIsLqSgiKhwWKfZw= =ZRh6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wednesday, 11.04.2007 at 09:21 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:03:06PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > > > > *unsure* I vaguely remember that Smoothwall used this port for remote > > access, I think. (i.e. you could connect to your own Smoothwall > > installation on that port to configure it. > > > > Reviewing what I was doing on the box last night: > aptitude was [still is ] in the midst of downloading a package> > Konqueror kept not responding but; > > KDE kept Konking Out (requiring Ctrl-Alt-BS) > > (Konqueror works OK when accessed via SSH from other box) > > I suppose its possible that in the process of Konking out it made > connection attempts on the wrong port. I'm not really interested in > fixing KDE; I think I'll be going back to XFCE but using K apps. > > So should I forget about the port 81 attempt? I don't see any evidence > on the box that there's been a compromise. You misunderstand. This is nothing to do with you. Probably someone who had your (dynamic) IP before you used to run Smoothwall. You can ignore it. Dave. -- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - davee@sungate.co.uk - jabber: davee@jabber.org All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGHOy3nhBnac0o2pIRAj/JAJ0SItmEjjnZbuBE9N38vhTw6vIYiACaA/UH fDqtUMGRoANWJBy0wQtxqDo= =gAKx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|