I have udev 0.103-2 in hold due the #409503, but is 20 days old and I suspect
that is not a general error.

Someone with new udev 0.105-1? Problems?

--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat



.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 08:47:12PM +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> I have udev 0.103-2 in hold due the #409503, but is 20 days old and I suspect
> that is not a general error.

have you read this bug? its pretty specific to a xen system during
initial install. Are you in that situation?

>
> Someone with new udev 0.105-1? Problems?

I"ve had udev 0.105-1 since it came out (I upgrade sid pretty much
daily) with no problems. Can't guarantee that I've rebooted with that
udev though.

A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF4K0kaIeIEqwil4YRAkxUAJwKbR7+5GEaG26oQgSUFa 0zc9xFyQCggO12
mXX7zIG6JulwyYtt4R6HLPI=
=mSjR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

El Dissabte 24 Febrer 2007 22:24, Andrew Sackville-West va escriure:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 08:47:12PM +0100, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> > I have udev 0.103-2 in hold due the #409503, but is 20 days old and I
> > suspect that is not a general error.
>
> have you read this bug?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409503

> its pretty specific to a xen system during
> initial install. Are you in that situation?

No, I'm sorry :$

> > Someone with new udev 0.105-1? Problems?
>
> I"ve had udev 0.105-1 since it came out (I upgrade sid pretty much
> daily) with no problems. Can't guarantee that I've rebooted with that
> udev though.

I've updated and rebooted without problems. Thanks

--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat



.