|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.unix.shell Using and programming the Unix shell. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I'm starting to adjust to using bash after many years of happy korn
shell usage. I like some of the shortcuts in bash but a few things are driving me nuts. For instance, when I set the shell to vi mode, and then use the up arrow to get my previous command out of history, bash seems to be immediately in insert mode. My preference would be in command mode so I can jump around and edit the line using the vi navigation commands my fingers know so well. Does anyone know of any workarounds that won't break the up arrow for other commands? Thanks, -Jonathan |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
salty_sohal@yahoo.com wrote:
> I'm starting to adjust to using bash after many years of happy korn > shell usage. I like some of the shortcuts in bash but a few things are > driving me nuts. For instance, when I set the shell to vi mode, and > then use the up arrow to get my previous command out of history, bash > seems to be immediately in insert mode. My preference would be in > command mode so I can jump around and edit the line using the vi > navigation commands my fingers know so well. Does anyone know of any > workarounds that won't break the up arrow for other commands? The bash input controlls are in a file called .inputrc - see info readline for details. But I have to say that .inputrc isn't all that easy to understand and difficult to debug as it only read at system start-up. I for once never liked the bash vi mode (or .inputrc for that matter) and in the end I moved on to Z-Shell [1] which offer a far better control over the the way insert and normal mode work. Have a look at my "vim-mode" [2] and how the bindkey offers a vicmd and viins. If .inputrc offers anything similar then I never found it. Also since "bindkey" is a normal command it easier to debug. As Z-Shell can do almost everything bash can do and a lot more i never looked back. And since you are a former korn shell user: have a look at [3] and search for "KSH" ;-) Martin [1] http://zsh.dotsrc.org/ [2] http://martin.krischik.com/index.php/Z-Shell/VimMode [3] http://zsh.dotsrc.org/Doc/Release/zsh_15.html -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:17:07 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote:
> salty_sohal@yahoo.com wrote: > >> I'm starting to adjust to using bash after many years of happy korn >> shell usage. I like some of the shortcuts in bash but a few things are >> driving me nuts. For instance, when I set the shell to vi mode, and >> then use the up arrow to get my previous command out of history, bash >> seems to be immediately in insert mode. My preference would be in >> command mode so I can jump around and edit the line using the vi >> navigation commands my fingers know so well. Does anyone know of any >> workarounds that won't break the up arrow for other commands? > > The bash input controlls are in a file called .inputrc - see info > readline for details. But I have to say that .inputrc isn't all that > easy to understand and difficult to debug as it only read at system > start-up. Actually you can tell bash to re-read its inputrc file in a number of different ways. 1) Using the re-read-init-file function, this is bound to ctrl-x ctrl-r in the standard emacs mode, but is not bound in vi mode. 2) Using "bind -f .inputrc". 3) Starting a new subshell, e.g. INPUTRC=test_inputrc bash will use test_inputrc as the configuration file. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:17:07 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote:
> salty_sohal@yahoo.com wrote: > >> I'm starting to adjust to using bash after many years of happy korn >> shell usage. I like some of the shortcuts in bash but a few things are >> driving me nuts. For instance, when I set the shell to vi mode, and >> then use the up arrow to get my previous command out of history, bash >> seems to be immediately in insert mode. My preference would be in >> command mode so I can jump around and edit the line using the vi >> navigation commands my fingers know so well. Does anyone know of any >> workarounds that won't break the up arrow for other commands? > > The bash input controlls are in a file called .inputrc - see info > readline for details. But I have to say that .inputrc isn't all that > easy to understand and difficult to debug as it only read at system > start-up. Actually you can tell bash to re-read its inputrc file in a number of different ways. 1) Using the re-read-init-file function, this is bound to ctrl-x ctrl-r in the standard emacs mode, but is not bound in vi mode. 2) Using "bind -f .inputrc". 3) Starting a new subshell, e.g. INPUTRC=test_inputrc bash will use test_inputrc as the configuration file. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
salty_sohal@yahoo.com wrote:
> I'm starting to adjust to using bash after many years of happy korn > shell usage. I like some of the shortcuts in bash but a few things are > driving me nuts. For instance, when I set the shell to vi mode, and > then use the up arrow to get my previous command out of history, bash > seems to be immediately in insert mode. My preference would be in > command mode so I can jump around and edit the line using the vi > navigation commands my fingers know so well. Does anyone know of any > workarounds that won't break the up arrow for other commands? <Up-Arrow> works both in command mode and in insert mode. So, I suspect that you're in insert mode to begin with. -- William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>, Toronto, Canada BashDiff: Super Bash shell http://freshmeat.net/projects/bashdiff/ |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|