|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.security.ssh SSH secure remote login and tunneling tools. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Since I installed a gigabit switch and have gigabit cards, I became
aware that SSH encryption is the bottleneck to transferring large files quickly. The CPU does not keep up with data transfer rate. I would like to know if there is a "lite" cypher that I could choose that would be considerably faster. I tried 3des, blowfish and AES-128. Security does not matter as much in this application, this is a home LAN. I mean, I do want secure authentication, but I do not care if the data traffic can be deciphered somewhat more easily than "strong crypto" can make it. i |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Ignoramus19897 <ignoramus19897@NOSPAM.19897.invalid> writes:
> Since I installed a gigabit switch and have gigabit cards, I became > aware that SSH encryption is the bottleneck to transferring large > files quickly. The CPU does not keep up with data transfer rate. > > I would like to know if there is a "lite" cypher that I could choose > that would be considerably faster. I tried 3des, blowfish and AES-128. > > Security does not matter as much in this application, this is a home > LAN. I mean, I do want secure authentication, but I do not care if the > data traffic can be deciphered somewhat more easily than "strong > crypto" can make it. In SecureCRT, I see options including RC4 and None for ciphers. Both of which should be lighter than the 3 you've tried. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|