Here is the debug output that i get when i do ssh and try to login into

a remote server:
OpenSSH_3.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Applying options for *
debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to serv1.vtu.org [202.134.239.18] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug3: Not a RSA1 key file /home/thecoolone/.ssh/id_rsa.
debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type '-----BEGIN'
debug3: key_read: missing keytype
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug3: key_read: missing whitespace
debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type '-----END'
debug3: key_read: missing keytype
debug1: identity file /home/thecoolone/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version
OpenSSH_3.1p1
debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.*,OpenSSH_3.0*,OpenSSH_3.1*
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.9p1
debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96

debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0
debug2: mac_init: found hmac-md5
debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug2: mac_init: found hmac-md5
debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP
debug2: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 122/256
debug2: bits set: 488/1024
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY
debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: filename
/home/thecoolone/.ssh/known_hosts
debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: match line 1
debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: filename
/home/thecoolone/.ssh/known_hosts
debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: match line 1
debug1: Host 'serv1.vtu.org' is known and matches the RSA host key.
debug1: Found key in /home/thecoolone/.ssh/known_hosts:1
debug2: bits set: 511/1024
debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
debug2: kex_derive_keys
debug2: set_newkeys: mode 1
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug2: set_newkeys: mode 0
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug2: service_accept: ssh-userauth
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug2: key: /home/thecoolone/.ssh/id_rsa (0x82c2ee8)
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
debug3: start over, passed a different list
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
debug3: preferred
gssapi-with-mic,publickey,keyboard-interactive,password
debug3: authmethod_lookup publickey
debug3: remaining preferred: keyboard-interactive,password
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled publickey
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Offering public key: /home/thecoolone/.ssh/id_rsa
debug3: send_pubkey_test
debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method
debug3: authmethod_lookup keyboard-interactive
debug3: remaining preferred: password
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled keyboard-interactive
debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive
debug2: userauth_kbdint
debug2: we sent a keyboard-interactive packet, wait for reply
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
debug3: userauth_kbdint: disable: no info_req_seen
debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method
debug3: authmethod_lookup password
debug3: remaining preferred:
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled password
debug1: Next authentication method: password
I have checked for the permissions of $HOME it is 755 and $HOME/.ssh is

700
drwxr-xr-x 4 thecoolone thecoolone 4096 Dec 1 03:53 thecoolone
drwx------ 2 thecoolone thecoolone 4096 Dec 1 03:36 .ssh
-rw-r--r-- 1 thecoolone thecoolone 232 Apr 9 2006 id_rsa.pub
On debug3: is is saying "Not a RSA1 key file
/home/thecoolone/.ssh/id_rsa."
and then later "debug1: identity file /home/thecoolone/.ssh/id_rsa type

1"
I am not understanding that why at first it says not an RSA type and
then
recognises it as type 1?
Does anyone have a clue on how to make ssh work with passphrase. It was

working before i tried to make a new crontab for another account and
now i am reverting back to the old crontab and ssh is asking password.
Why is the old crontab not working any more?

> I am not understanding

Nor I am I understanding why you keep posting this crap

DAve

gort wrote:
> > I am not understanding
>
> Nor I am I understanding why you keep posting this crap

You here to just talk crap or ?? If you can't then don't
reply. I don't need your 2 cent's comments

thecoolone wrote:
>
> Here is the debug output that i get when i do ssh and try to login into

Posting that mess 3 times within 40 minutes will not endear you to
anyone. Learn how usenet works. Google is not usenet, it is only
a lame interface to it.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>

CBFalconer wrote:
> thecoolone wrote:
> >
> > Here is the debug output that i get when i do ssh and try to login into
>
> Posting that mess 3 times within 40 minutes will not endear you to
> anyone. Learn how usenet works. Google is not usenet, it is only
> a lame interface to it.
>
> --
> Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
> Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
> <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>

He has not yet explained why he's posting to a Linux group and a SCO
group.
If the server side of this is an older SCO box, that could explain much
(because SCO never had ssh until very recently and adding it to some
older versions could easily be screwed up).

Also, his posts seem contradictory: crontab didn't work, it did,
command line worked, it doesn't.... I have no idea what the heck is
really going on.

I wash my hands of him. Too hard to extract information.

--
Tony Lawrence
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X Resources
http://aplawrence.com

"thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:

> gort wrote:
> > > I am not understanding
> >
> > Nor I am I understanding why you keep posting this crap
>
> You here to just talk crap or ?? If you can't then don't
> reply. I don't need your 2 cent's comments

For such a cool one, you're
a) kinda an entitlement minded asshole
and
b) oblivious to the fact that you have posted a number of the
identical or very similar posts with your debug output.

People are trying to , but when you screw up and post your crap 10
times, you have to expect someone to at least mention it.

--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Todd H. wrote:
> "thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > gort wrote:
> > > > I am not understanding
> > >
> > > Nor I am I understanding why you keep posting this crap
> >
> > You here to just talk crap or ?? If you can't then don't
> > reply. I don't need your 2 cent's comments
>
> For such a cool one, you're
> a) kinda an entitlement minded asshole

I wont even bother responding to such a propositus statement.


> b) oblivious to the fact that you have posted a number of the
> identical or very similar posts with your debug output.

Well it isn't my fault that google doesn't have an edit option to
modify the post. So the only option i have is to delete the old message
and repost the edited one. Thats the only reason why i posted the same
message so many times.

> People are trying to , but when you screw up and post your crap 10
> times, you have to expect someone to at least mention it.

Since i am a newbie in here. Before someone mentioned kindly that in
usenet use proper words while typing for . And i accepted that
advice without any problem.
But you guys in here are trying to be smartasses and boss around giving
advice rudely.
You don't own the "usenet" , to order me what to do. If you would have
said the same thing politely i would thank you for your sound
suggestion. But now i don't give a rat's ass to what you are saying.
Like i said before I don't need your 2 cent's crap comments

By the way Chris Davies I thank you for being so patient and answering
my questions.

"thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:


>Todd H. wrote:
>> "thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > gort wrote:
>> > > > I am not understanding
>> > >
>> > > Nor I am I understanding why you keep posting this crap
>> >
>> > You here to just talk crap or ?? If you can't then don't
>> > reply. I don't need your 2 cent's comments
>>
>> For such a cool one, you're
>> a) kinda an entitlement minded asshole

>I wont even bother responding to such a propositus statement.

But you did anyway.



>> b) oblivious to the fact that you have posted a number of the
>> identical or very similar posts with your debug output.

>Well it isn't my fault that google doesn't have an edit option to
>modify the post. So the only option i have is to delete the old message
>and repost the edited one. Thats the only reason why i posted the same
>message so many times.

It sounds to me like you need a new newsreader. And once you send off your
post you cannot edit it. If you want to change something, then do not
simply repost it. Noone will see the correction. They will assume that you
are just posting it multiple times. Instead send a new post saying.
In my last post I made and error. When I said I was using Linux I meant
that I was using Windows. ( or whatever the actual error was)



>> People are trying to , but when you screw up and post your crap 10
>> times, you have to expect someone to at least mention it.

>Since i am a newbie in here. Before someone mentioned kindly that in
>usenet use proper words while typing for . And i accepted that
>advice without any problem.
>But you guys in here are trying to be smartasses and boss around giving
>advice rudely.

You are the one that wants advice. If that is what you want, then you are
asking other people for favours. That means that sometimes you have to
accept criticism and just swallow it or say sorry. You did post the same
thing multiple times. That is NOT a good thing to do, and the proper
response is "Sorry" Not "Get off my back".

>You don't own the "usenet" , to order me what to do. If you would have

NOr do you. YOu are asking for advice. You are asking for a favour.


>said the same thing politely i would thank you for your sound
>suggestion. But now i don't give a rat's ass to what you are saying.
>Like i said before I don't need your 2 cent's crap comments

Apparently you do give a "rat's ass" since you spent 5 minutes responding.


>By the way Chris Davies I thank you for being so patient and answering
>my questions.


Remember that. And do not discourage others by your attitude.

Unruh wrote:
> "thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> >Todd H. wrote:
> >> "thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > gort wrote:
> >> > > > I am not understanding
> >> > >
> >> > > Nor I am I understanding why you keep posting this crap
> >> >
> >> > You here to just talk crap or ?? If you can't then don't
> >> > reply. I don't need your 2 cent's comments
> >>
> >> For such a cool one, you're
> >> a) kinda an entitlement minded asshole
>
> >I wont even bother responding to such a propositus statement.
>
> But you did anyway.
>
>
>
> >> b) oblivious to the fact that you have posted a number of the
> >> identical or very similar posts with your debug output.
>
> >Well it isn't my fault that google doesn't have an edit option to
> >modify the post. So the only option i have is to delete the old message
> >and repost the edited one. Thats the only reason why i posted the same
> >message so many times.
>
> It sounds to me like you need a new newsreader. And once you send off your
> post you cannot edit it. If you want to change something, then do not
> simply repost it. Noone will see the correction. They will assume that you
> are just posting it multiple times. Instead send a new post saying.
> In my last post I made and error. When I said I was using Linux I meant
> that I was using Windows. ( or whatever the actual error was)
>
>
>
> >> People are trying to , but when you screw up and post your crap 10
> >> times, you have to expect someone to at least mention it.
>
> >Since i am a newbie in here. Before someone mentioned kindly that in
> >usenet use proper words while typing for . And i accepted that
> >advice without any problem.
> >But you guys in here are trying to be smartasses and boss around giving
> >advice rudely.
>
> You are the one that wants advice. If that is what you want, then you are
> asking other people for favours. That means that sometimes you have to
> accept criticism and just swallow it or say sorry. You did post the same
> thing multiple times. That is NOT a good thing to do, and the proper
> response is "Sorry" Not "Get off my back".
>
> >You don't own the "usenet" , to order me what to do. If you would have
>
> NOr do you. YOu are asking for advice. You are asking for a favour.


Thank you for your advice.
I am just curious to know one thing. How can i delete the old posts
that i posted?? Is there any admin or someone whom i can contact to
delete my old posts? And are the posts deleted after some period of
time (i.e inactivity) or are they permanently stored? And finally could
you suggest a good newsreader for windows?

>
>
> >said the same thing politely i would thank you for your sound
> >suggestion. But now i don't give a rat's ass to what you are saying.
> >Like i said before I don't need your 2 cent's crap comments
>
> Apparently you do give a "rat's ass" since you spent 5 minutes responding.
>
>
> >By the way Chris Davies I thank you for being so patient and answering
> >my questions.
>
>
> Remember that. And do not discourage others by your attitude.

"thecoolone" <jahan9@gmail.com> writes:

> Thank you for your advice.
> I am just curious to know one thing. How can i delete the old posts
> that i posted?? Is there any admin or someone whom i can contact to
> delete my old posts? And are the posts deleted after some period of
> time (i.e inactivity) or are they permanently stored? And finally could
> you suggest a good newsreader for windows?

With usenet, there is no sure fire way to retract anything. There is
the notion of a cancel message, but because of abuse of cancel
features and cancel forgery, etc, fewer and fewer servers will honor
cancels. Then there's the matter of usenet archives (such as
groups.google.com, previously dejanews.com, among others). You can
get it deleted from every archive you find, but there's bound to be an
archive that won't let you delete.

--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/