|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.security.ssh SSH secure remote login and tunneling tools. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Bit Twister wrote:
> On 22 Oct 2006 23:44:46 -0700, Tim wrote: >> Does anyone know of any reputable agencies where you can rent a shell >> that uses SSH tuneled over HTTP/SSL? > > You might want to check with the United States Marine Core base > commander first. He may take a dim view of your connection. What makes you think that something illegitimate may be going on? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:01:20 GMT, Chuck wrote:
> Bit Twister wrote: >> On 22 Oct 2006 23:44:46 -0700, Tim wrote: >>> Does anyone know of any reputable agencies where you can rent a shell >>> that uses SSH tuneled over HTTP/SSL? >> >> You might want to check with the United States Marine Core base >> commander first. He may take a dim view of your connection. > > What makes you think that something illegitimate may be going on? Nothing makes me think something illegitimate may be going on. Military censors like to see everything leaving the base. ![]() |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Bit Twister wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:01:20 GMT, Chuck wrote: >> Bit Twister wrote: >>> On 22 Oct 2006 23:44:46 -0700, Tim wrote: >>>> Does anyone know of any reputable agencies where you can rent a shell >>>> that uses SSH tuneled over HTTP/SSL? >>> You might want to check with the United States Marine Core base >>> commander first. He may take a dim view of your connection. >> What makes you think that something illegitimate may be going on? > > Nothing makes me think something illegitimate may be going on. > > Military censors like to see everything leaving the base. ![]() What makes you think it's on a military base? (Just curious. I didn't see anything in the OP that indicated that.) |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:21:28 GMT, Chuck wrote:
> > What makes you think it's on a military base? (Just curious. I didn't > see anything in the OP that indicated that.) Same thing that makes me thing you are around Downingtown, Pennsylvania. You might look around in your Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 and see what you can see in the post's headers. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Bit Twister wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:21:28 GMT, Chuck wrote: >> What makes you think it's on a military base? (Just curious. I didn't >> see anything in the OP that indicated that.) > > Same thing that makes me thing you are around Downingtown, Pennsylvania. That would be the exit point of a proxy chain. You can't be too careful these days. ;-) > > You might look around in your Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 and see what you can > see in the post's headers. 192.156.56.34. When I first looked at it I must have been seeing crosseyed. I thought it was an untraceable 192.168.x.x private IP. 192.156.56.23 is owned by usmc.mil and located in Wichita KS. Something tells me that's another endpoint though. ;-) |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:08:35 GMT, Chuck wrote:
> > 192.156.56.34. When I first looked at it I must have been seeing > crosseyed. I thought it was an untraceable 192.168.x.x private IP. Yes, that 192 made me look twice. Then I was curious about it. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Bit Twister wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:08:35 GMT, Chuck wrote: >> 192.156.56.34. When I first looked at it I must have been seeing >> crosseyed. I thought it was an untraceable 192.168.x.x private IP. > > Yes, that 192 made me look twice. Then I was curious about it. I guess when you work for the folks that invented the internet, you just might get a 192/8 address. I wonder if Al Gore applied for one? |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|