|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.protocols.tcp-ip TCP and IP network protocols. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
I was curious if anyone knows which version of TCP is implemented in today's 802.11/802.11b wireless cards? Tahoe, Reno, Newreno, Sack, Lite ? Is there one that is recommended best for wireless implementation that performs the best? Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On May 10, 12:54 pm, stylez03 <william2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I was curious if anyone knows which version of TCP is implemented in > today's 802.11/802.11b wireless cards? > > Tahoe, Reno, Newreno, Sack, Lite ? None. The TCP/IP stack is in the PC hosting the wireless card, the wireless card looks more or less like any other network card and basically sends and receives packets (once you get past all the management stuff, anyway). |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
With that said, which TCP Implementation is best for wireless then?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On May 10, 5:59 pm, stylez03 <william2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With that said, which TCP Implementation is best for wireless then? This is Usenet, please quote properly. I've seen a couple of papers that say SACK plus New-Reno does pretty well for wireless links. The major feature of wireless links are packet losses, both singletons and in large bursts, a TCP implementation that handles those well will likely to well over a wireless link. Best? Sounds like a research project to me... Mind you that the performance of the TCP connection over the wireless link is affected by the TCP implementations at both ends of the connection, so to do best, you'd want SACK+New-Reno on both the client with the wireless connection and the server it's talking to (assuming the typical placement of the wireless link). |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|