PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Noms de domaine > comp.protocols.tcp-ip > Single out whois record
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
comp.protocols.tcp-ip TCP and IP network protocols.

Single out whois record

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 08/04/2007, 19h16   #1
stilmark
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Single out whois record

I'm trying to figure out how to single out a whois record:

http://www.whois.net/whois_new.cgi?d=enter-net&tld=com

I've tried making sense of the following notice from whois, but so
farno luck.

To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of
the of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look
them up with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record.

Doing a whois for "google.com" reveals a similar result:

http://www.whois.net/whois_new.cgi?d=google&tld=com

Whereas the following only returns one record:

http://www.whois.net/whois_new.cgi?d...hannel&tld=com

Can anyone explain how I single out just the ".com" domain?

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/04/2007, 21h01   #2
Moe Trin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Single out whois record

On 8 Apr 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.protocols.tcp-ip, in article
<1176056195.278088.228810@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>, stilmark wrote:

>I'm trying to figure out how to single out a whois record:


>I've tried making sense of the following notice from whois, but so
>farno luck.
>
>To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of
>the of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look
>them up with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record.


Do exactly what it says - precede the domain name with the equal sign.

>Doing a whois for "google.com" reveals a similar result:


[compton ~]$ whois google.com
[whois.internic.net]

Whois Server Version 1.3

Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.

GOOGLE.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM
GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
GOOGLE.COM.WORDT.DOOR.VEEL.WHTERS.GEBRUIKT.SERVERT JE.NET
GOOGLE.COM.VN
GOOGLE.COM.UA
GOOGLE.COM.SUCKS.FIND.CRACKZ.WITH.SEARCH.GULLI.COM
GOOGLE.COM.SPROSIUYANDEKSA.RU
GOOGLE.COM.SA
GOOGLE.COM.PLZ.GIVE.A.PR8.TO.AUDIOTRACKER.NET
GOOGLE.COM.MX
GOOGLE.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET
GOOGLE.COM.IS.HOSTED.ON.PROFITHOSTING.NET
GOOGLE.COM.IS.APPROVED.BY.NUMEA.COM
GOOGLE.COM.HAS.LESS.FREE.PORN.IN.ITS.SEARCH.ENGINE .THAN.SECZY.COM
GOOGLE.COM.DO
GOOGLE.COM.BR
GOOGLE.COM.AU
GOOGLE.COM

[snip more useless crap]

Ah yes - internic trying to be ful.

[compton ~]$ whois =GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
[whois.internic.net]

Whois Server Version 1.3

Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.

Server Name: GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
IP Address: 217.107.217.167
Registrar: ONLINENIC, INC.
Whois Server: whois.OnlineNIC.com
Referral URL: http://www.OnlineNIC.com

[snip more boiler plate]

Now the fact that RFC0952 didn't intend the 'dot' character to be used
as a part of the domain name has to be tempered with the fact that the
ISO-3166 domains really have a need for second level domains, and those
would be separated by dots. The dot used as a separator is also a
requirement in RFC1035. But clearly some registrars are ignoring
this concept in their quest for registration fees.

Old guy

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/04/2007, 01h41   #3
Barry Margolin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Single out whois record

In article <slrnf1l6se.uai.ibuprofin@compton.phx.az.us>,
ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld (Moe Trin) wrote:

> On 8 Apr 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.protocols.tcp-ip, in article
> <1176056195.278088.228810@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups. com>, stilmark wrote:
>
> >I'm trying to figure out how to single out a whois record:

>
> >I've tried making sense of the following notice from whois, but so
> >farno luck.
> >
> >To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of
> >the of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look
> >them up with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record.

>
> Do exactly what it says - precede the domain name with the equal sign.
>
> >Doing a whois for "google.com" reveals a similar result:

>
> [compton ~]$ whois google.com
> [whois.internic.net]
>
> Whois Server Version 1.3
>
> Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
> with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
> for detailed information.
>
> GOOGLE.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM
> GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
> GOOGLE.COM.WORDT.DOOR.VEEL.WHTERS.GEBRUIKT.SERVERT JE.NET
> GOOGLE.COM.VN
> GOOGLE.COM.UA
> GOOGLE.COM.SUCKS.FIND.CRACKZ.WITH.SEARCH.GULLI.COM
> GOOGLE.COM.SPROSIUYANDEKSA.RU
> GOOGLE.COM.SA
> GOOGLE.COM.PLZ.GIVE.A.PR8.TO.AUDIOTRACKER.NET
> GOOGLE.COM.MX
> GOOGLE.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET
> GOOGLE.COM.IS.HOSTED.ON.PROFITHOSTING.NET
> GOOGLE.COM.IS.APPROVED.BY.NUMEA.COM
> GOOGLE.COM.HAS.LESS.FREE.PORN.IN.ITS.SEARCH.ENGINE .THAN.SECZY.COM
> GOOGLE.COM.DO
> GOOGLE.COM.BR
> GOOGLE.COM.AU
> GOOGLE.COM
>
> [snip more useless crap]
>
> Ah yes - internic trying to be ful.
>
> [compton ~]$ whois =GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM


Do you really need the "=" for that? That name isn't a prefix of any
other name, so it's already unambiguous.

> [whois.internic.net]
>
> Whois Server Version 1.3
>
> Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
> with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
> for detailed information.
>
> Server Name: GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
> IP Address: 217.107.217.167
> Registrar: ONLINENIC, INC.
> Whois Server: whois.OnlineNIC.com
> Referral URL: http://www.OnlineNIC.com
>
> [snip more boiler plate]
>
> Now the fact that RFC0952 didn't intend the 'dot' character to be used
> as a part of the domain name has to be tempered with the fact that the
> ISO-3166 domains really have a need for second level domains, and those
> would be separated by dots. The dot used as a separator is also a
> requirement in RFC1035. But clearly some registrars are ignoring
> this concept in their quest for registration fees.


But how do you single out just the real GOOGLE.COM? "whois =google.com"
still displays all those matching names.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/04/2007, 03h52   #4
Moe Trin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Single out whois record

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.protocols.tcp-ip, in article
<barmar-4B9796.20412509042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, Barry Margolin wrote:

>ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld (Moe Trin) wrote:


>> Ah yes - internic trying to be ful.
>>
>> [compton ~]$ whois =GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM


>Do you really need the "=" for that? That name isn't a prefix of any
>other name, so it's already unambiguous.


Actually, I use a script that detects the multiple answers response, and
re-runs the query automatically with the equal sign, and parses out the
correct whois server using some rather ugly scripting.

>But how do you single out just the real GOOGLE.COM? "whois =google.com"
>still displays all those matching names.


Aw, Barry - you don't _really_ want to see that kludge, do you?

FOO=$1
$BAR=`whois "=$FOO" | grep -i -A15 "$FOO$" | sed -n '/$FOO/,/Whois Server/p'`
REFERRER=`echo $BAR | grep 'Whois Server' | cut -d':' -f2`
if [ -n $REFERRER ] ; then
whois ${1}@${$REFERRER}
fi

because I'm usually interested in the actual whois data. So far, I don't
recall the script failing, possibly because this code doesn't get
triggered that often.

Old guy
  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 08h25.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,18795 seconds with 12 queries