|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.protocols.tcp-ip TCP and IP network protocols. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
Till some time back, a patch for FAST TCP was available for download from the Caltech website. This has, however, been removed now. If someone could point me to a place from where I can download this, I would be grateful! Regards, Siddharth |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Siddharth Jain wrote:
> Hi, > > Till some time back, a patch for FAST TCP was available for download > from the Caltech website. This has, however, been removed now. > If someone could point me to a place from where I can download this, I > would be grateful! The link was removed because dial-up users were complaining that, every time they tried to download the patch, gigabits of data per second bombarded and crashed their machines using FAST technology. So to protect these dial-up users, Caltech removed the link. ![]() Seriously, I'm glad this subject has been broached again, as it allows me to rant on the irresponsibility of Caltech in the manner in which they published their research. "Imagine an internet connection so fast it will let you download a whole movie in just five seconds, or access TV-quality video servers in real time. That is the promise from a team at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, who have developed a system called Fast TCP." Five seconds! Wow! Shannon would be so pleased! I think Caltech itself was partly responsible for the gross mischaracterization of their research and its subsequent misinterpretation by the public. People who are not technologists are just as naive to this type of marketing as many of us would be to brain surgery, and Caltech should have known this when they introduced their work. The should have stated the truth simply: "No, grandma will not get 900 mbits/s over her old 9600 baud Hayes modem. To get 900 mbits/s, it will significantly if you already have a 900 mbit/s link to your house." Their portrayal of their work was simply irresponsible. -Le Chaud Lapin- Reference: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3799 |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|