|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.protocols.tcp-ip TCP and IP network protocols. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
I would like to sniff packet for a TCP/IP device (not a PC) in my network. This device "talk" with another device ans I would like to see the traffic between this two device. I scan all the traffic with Ethereal, but I see just the traffic that I receive (the PC with Ethereal) and the brodcast. Someone know what is my problem? Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Mtn_bikers ha escrito:
> Hi, > > I would like to sniff packet for a TCP/IP device (not a PC) in my > network. This device "talk" with another device ans I would like to > see the traffic between this two device. > I scan all the traffic with Ethereal, but I see just the traffic that I > receive (the PC with Ethereal) and the brodcast. > > Someone know what is my problem? > > Thanks. How are all those devices connected??? I guess they are using a switch...that would explain what you are seeing. If that is the case, try using span ports. Lokke. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Mtn_bikers <mtn_bikers@msn.com> wrote:
> I would like to sniff packet for a TCP/IP device (not a PC) in my > network. This device "talk" with another device ans I would like to > see the traffic between this two device. I scan all the traffic > with Ethereal, but I see just the traffic that I receive (the PC > with Ethereal) and the brodcast. Assuming your systems are all connected via a switch or switches... Switches perform "traffic isolation." The switch will "learn" on which port it sees a given MAC (ethernet) address as a source and will then send traffic destined to that MAC only to that port. Nodes on other ports will not see the traffic even if their interfaces are in promiscuous mode. You either need to connect the system of interest and the sniffing system with a _hub_ (not a switch, not a bogusly named "switching hub") that you then connect to the switch port of the system of interest. Otherwise, if you have a sufficiently capable switch, you can designate a port to be a "monitor port" or somesuch name (varies by switch) and that traffic to/from another port should be mirrored/monitored onto that port. rick jones -- a wide gulf separates "what if" from "if only" these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... ![]() feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
From: "Mtn_bikers" <mtn_bikers@msn.com>
| Hi, | | I would like to sniff packet for a TCP/IP device (not a PC) in my | network. This device "talk" with another device ans I would like to | see the traffic between this two device. | I scan all the traffic with Ethereal, but I see just the traffic that I | receive (the PC with Ethereal) and the brodcast. | | Someone know what is my problem? | | Thanks. The PC with Ethereal needs to be on a hub, not an Ethwernet Switch, and needs a promiscuous NIC and drivers on the same network as the TCP/IP device/appliance. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
The PC with ethereal is on the same "HUB" of my first device. If I telnet the device from this PC I saw the packet but if the device talk to another device, I don't see anything. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
From: "Mtn_bikers" <mtn_bikers@msn.com>
| | The PC with ethereal is on the same "HUB" of my first device. If I | telnet the device from this PC I saw the packet but if the device talk | to another device, I don't see anything. You need to have a promiscuous LAN adapter on the Ethereal based platform. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Mtn_bikers <mtn_bikers@msn.com> wrote:
> The PC with ethereal is on the same "HUB" of my first device. If I > telnet the device from this PC I saw the packet but if the device talk > to another device, I don't see anything. Since you put "HUB" in quotes, is it at all possible that it is really a switch? I'm not sure it is conclusive, but if you can get full-duplex, I believe that means it is a switch and not a hub and so the previous post(s) about switches and traffic isolation would apply. Assuming of course that ethereal is indeed putting the interface into promiscuous mode. rick jones -- Wisdom Teeth are impacted, people are affected by the effects of events. these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... ![]() feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|