PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Forum Noms de domaine > comp.protocols.tcp-ip > gateway routers with very simple NAT
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
comp.protocols.tcp-ip TCP and IP network protocols.

gateway routers with very simple NAT

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 20/05/2006, 05h11   #1
wkaras@yahoo.com
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut gateway routers with very simple NAT

Are there gateway routers available that can be provisioned to
use a simple mathematical conversion between external
and private static addresses. An example might be private
address equals 10.0.A.B:500C where A, B, C are digits
in the external port number 50ABC. The gateway would
use ARP to route packets on the private lan. It would
not need to act as a DHCP server (or gateway).

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 21/05/2006, 14h08   #2
q_q_anonymous@yahoo.co.uk
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: gateway routers with very simple NAT


wkaras@yahoo.com wrote:
> Are there gateway routers


same thing . though perhaps a gateway needn't use a routing table and
perhaps a router must.

> available that can be provisioned to
> use a simple mathematical conversion between external
> and private static addresses. An example might be private
> address equals 10.0.A.B:500C where A, B, C are digits
> in the external port number 50ABC.


that port looks funny, I don't think they get that big

>The gateway would
> use ARP to route packets


ARP doesn't route packets. A network protocol e.g. IP routes packets.

> on the private lan. It would
> not need to act as a DHCP server (or gateway).


MAC addresses are usually stored by the manufacturer. How would you
ensure in your mathematics that 2 MACs don't get the same IP. It
doesn't look sensible. MAC addresses aer given to you, and private
addresses don't have much flexibility. limited ranges, and are best
contiguous/incrementing by 1 or in contiguous groups, so as to be easy
to remember and for subnetting purposes.
You could look up an addrses and make sure it's nto already taken, but
that's silly 'cos
ARP is fairly quick, and it uses an ARP Cache/table. And just looks up
the address.

So either way you're searching through a table. Yours is worse 'cos you
have to search through the whole table.

  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 17h17.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,08280 seconds with 10 queries