right I anm trying to get Ports 25 and 465 to work with sendmail.

Why? Because the other dimwit providers do not knw
how to tell their poorly set up SMTP MUA to relay
internally or DHCP is breaking the security model of the competitors
model.

All the same we have to compensate by using port 465 because
the other goof says we do not want to be listed as a port 25 spammer.

How does one get both port 35 and 465 to working without getting
Deferred: Temporary AUTH failure
getting in the way?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
PAtriots! MAke your declaration of loyalty!

In article <fbjo7c$79r$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

> right I anm trying to get Ports 25 and 465 to work with sendmail.

Using port 465 for mail is a non-standard use of a port registered for
other use. Please do not perpetuate its abuse unless there is absolutely
no other option for your users, i.e. unless they are using obsolete
versions of Microsoft mail clients. Mail submission should be done on
port 587 using the standard SMTP-based submission protocol using
STARTTLS and AUTH.

> Why? Because the other dimwit providers do not knw
> how to tell their poorly set up SMTP MUA to relay
> internally or DHCP is breaking the security model of the competitors
> model.

Can you turn that into meaningful English?


> All the same we have to compensate by using port 465 because
> the other goof says we do not want to be listed as a port 25 spammer.

That too...


> How does one get both port 35 and 465 to working without getting
> Deferred: Temporary AUTH failure
> getting in the way?

Just set it up the right way. Not how you're doing it now.

Here's the last free clue I'll be providing you: You need to learn how
to ask questions usefully. That means explaining what you're trying to
do in careful detail and not just babbling and ranting about how someone
else is bad and wrong. It also requires you to reveal things like what
exactly you are doing and where exactly you are running into problems.
In other words: you MUST be willing to reveal your configuration and
logs. If you can't bring yourself to do that, you may simply need to
hire competent private instead of continuing to seek free
assistance here in your chronically annoying manner.

You've been told that here before. I wish you luck in absorbing that
clue and finding from someone who has not been frustrated by your
stubborn unwillingness to yourself.

--
Now where did I hide that website...