In light of the reminder, courtesy of C|Net, that DKIM is on the standards
track, I decided I'd finally try adding DomainKeys signatures to my outgoing
emails relayed through my Solaris 10 host. Currently, the host is running
Sendmail 8.14.1 with libmilter (I'd had to build the milter support so that
I could do MIMEDefang).

So, I headed on over to SourceForge to download DK-milter 0.5.0. I modified
the Makefile.m4's to reflect my environment and set about to compiling the
DK milter. It appears to get most of the way through compilation (it creates
the libdk.a, libsm.so and libar.so file), then dies at:

Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
ar_cancelquery /Software/dk-milter-0.5.0/obj.SunOS.5.10.sun4/libdk/libdk.a
ar_waitreply /Software/dk-milter-0.5.0/obj.SunOS.5.10.sun4/libdk/libdk.a
ar_init /Software/dk-milter-0.5.0/obj.SunOS.5.10.sun4/libdk/libdk.a
ar_addquery /Software/dk-milter-0.5.0/obj.SunOS.5.10.sun4/libdk/libdk.a
ar_strerror /Software/dk-milter-0.5.0/obj.SunOS.5.10.sun4/libdk/libdk.a
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to dk-filter

While doing the assemble of the actual dk-filter object.

Environment:
Solaris 10 06/06 plus patches
GCC 3.4.3 from the "Solaris 10 Companion" CD
Sendmail 8.14.1

Any is appreciated and I'm happy to provide any additional details that
would solve this.

-tom
--

"You can only be -so- accurate with a claw-hammer." --me

Thomas H Jones II wrote:
> In light of the reminder, courtesy of C|Net, that DKIM is on the standards
> track, I decided I'd finally try adding DomainKeys signatures to my outgoing

Why do you want to use DK when DKIM is a standard?

> So, I headed on over to SourceForge to download DK-milter 0.5.0. I modified

Get dkim-milter (currently at 0.8.0, soon at 1.0.0).

In article <f32iek$2tm8$1@mothra.sendmail.com>,
Claus Assmann <ca+sendmail(no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de> wrote:
>Thomas H Jones II wrote:
>> In light of the reminder, courtesy of C|Net, that DKIM is on the standards
>> track, I decided I'd finally try adding DomainKeys signatures to my outgoing
>
>Why do you want to use DK when DKIM is a standard?

Followed a link from a "How To" guide.

>> So, I headed on over to SourceForge to download DK-milter 0.5.0. I modified
>
>Get dkim-milter (currently at 0.8.0, soon at 1.0.0).

Ok, cool. I'll check that to see if it's a bit more co-operative.

Just out of curiosity, has Yahoo already changed over to DKIM or are they
still on DK? One of the links I'd read said they were still doing DK.

-tom
--

"You can only be -so- accurate with a claw-hammer." --me