|
| PORTAIL | ANNUAIRE | ARTICLES | COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS | DEVIS | FORUMS | RÉDUCTEUR D'URL |
|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.mail.sendmail Configuring and using the BSD sendmail agent. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
30/01/2007, 14h17
|
#1 |
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Spamhaus ZEN
Hi, if you are using Spamhaus SBL-XBL, can I suggest you now switch to
Spamhaus ZEN (zen.spamhaus.org) which contains SBL+XBL+PBL For more info: http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/ -- Steve Linford The Spamhaus Project http://www.spamhaus.org |
|
|
30/01/2007, 14h53
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Spamhaus ZEN
On Jan 30, 9:17 am, Steve Linford <linf...@spamhaus.org> wrote: > Hi, if you are using Spamhaus SBL-XBL, can I suggest you now switch to > Spamhaus ZEN (zen.spamhaus.org) which contains SBL+XBL+PBL > > For more info:http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/ > > -- > Steve Linford > The Spamhaus Project > http://www.spamhaus.org We are using Zen, but are disappointed that the PBL is so limited. Why not block obvious pool addresses, even if the ISP hasn't contacted you? The last few spam I have received (passed by zen) are from (RDNS hostnames): ipa83.20.91.tellas.gr client-87-247-125-222.turbozone.lt cust-02-5286890e.adsl.scarlet.nl escapadeness.glut.volia.net mycomputer.kornet.net 87.250.111.150 217.16.16.81 170.252.72.95 That is 3 from pool addresses, 3 with no RDNS and 2 from non-generic RDNS. Seems like there is great potential from adding pool addresses to the DNSBL. Given that you allow individual senders to make corrections to the list, I don't see the downside. Daniel Feenberg feenberg isat nber dotte org |
|
|
|
30/01/2007, 15h09
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Spamhaus ZEN
In article <1170168806.235074.237340@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
"drfremove@nber.org" <feenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 30, 9:17 am, Steve Linford <linf...@spamhaus.org> wrote: > > Hi, if you are using Spamhaus SBL-XBL, can I suggest you now switch to > > Spamhaus ZEN (zen.spamhaus.org) which contains SBL+XBL+PBL > > > > For more info:http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/ > > > > -- > > Steve Linford > > The Spamhaus Project > > http://www.spamhaus.org > > We are using Zen, but are disappointed that the PBL is so limited. Why > not block obvious pool addresses, even if the ISP hasn't contacted > you? The PBL has only just started. It will take some weeks before it reaches optimum mass, and maybe a month more before the major Asian, African and South American networks input their DSL ranges. -- Steve Linford The Spamhaus Project http://www.spamhaus.org |
|
|
|
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|
