|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.mail.sendmail Configuring and using the BSD sendmail agent. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi
I have a number of Queue groups defined which are working as expected. Is it possible to produce a hack to cause some messages to always queue and some to be processed normally? Preferably based on the access map. cheers Matt |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 01/14/07 16:52, matt.hampton.uk@gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible to produce a hack to cause some messages to always queue > and some to be processed normally? Preferably based on the access map. I'm not sure if it will provide what you are after or not. You may want to consider looking in to Sendmail's quarantining capability. That is to say you can tell Sendmail to quarantine a message pending some external process's (read: human analysis) involvement. Grant. . . . |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"matt.hampton.uk@gmail.com" <matt.hampton.uk@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a number of Queue groups defined which are working as expected. > > Is it possible to produce a hack to cause some messages to always queue > and some to be processed normally? Preferably based on the access map. * You can create "expensive" (always queue) variants of standard mailers. [ F=e mailer flag and HoldExpensive configuration option ] * You can assign queue groups "per mailer". -- [pl2en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@priv.onet.pl : anfi@xl.wp.pl Before You Ask: http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/B4UAsk-Sendmail.html http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/ |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Jan 15, 9:06 am, Andrzej Adam Filip <a...@onet.eu> wrote:
> > Is it possible to produce a hack to cause some messages to always queue > > and some to be processed normally? Preferably based on the access map. > * You can create "expensive" (always queue) variants of standard mailers. [ F=e mailer flag and HoldExpensive configuration option ] > * You can assign queue groups "per mailer". Cheers - I hadn't thought of doing it that way. matt |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|