|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi all,
How to define the assignment operator for a class ? irb(main):012:0> class Test irb(main):013:1> def = other irb(main):014:2> puts other.class irb(main):015:2> end irb(main):016:1> end SyntaxError: compile error (irb):13: syntax error, unexpected '=' def = other ^ (irb):16: syntax error, unexpected kEND, expecting $end from (irb):16 Is there a way to solve my issue ? Where is my mistake ? I don't believe that's possible to assign something to an instance Best Regards, Stephane |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> > I don't believe that's possible to assign something to an instance > > Best Regards, > > Stephane Stephanie, In ruby, we don't assign to an instance as you mentioned, we assign to a variable that can hold any type. We therefore can't override the assignment operator. BUT you can override an assignment operation.. such as class Foo def bar= (val) @bar = val p "I am assigning #{val} to @bar" end hth ilan -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> Stephanie,
Stephane and not Stephanie :-) Stephanie is the firstname for a girl ![]() > > In ruby, we don't assign to an instance as you mentioned, we assign to a > variable that can hold any type. We therefore can't override the > assignment operator. > > BUT you can override an assignment operation.. such as > > class Foo > def bar= (val) > @bar = val > p "I am assigning #{val} to @bar" > end Grrr, so I have reason about this operator, I can't override it. Thanks |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Feb 21, 4:55 am, Stephane Wirtel <stephane.wir...@descasoft.com>
wrote: > Hi all, > > How to define the assignment operator for a class ? > > irb(main):012:0> class Test > irb(main):013:1> def = other > irb(main):014:2> puts other.class > irb(main):015:2> end > irb(main):016:1> end > SyntaxError: compile error > (irb):13: syntax error, unexpected '=' > def = other > ^ > (irb):16: syntax error, unexpected kEND, expecting $end from (irb):16 > > Is there a way to solve my issue ? > > Where is my mistake ? > > I don't believe that's possible to assign something to an instance > > Best Regards, > > Stephane Stephane, What exactly are you trying to do? If you are trying to implement a method that copies an object, this is supported in the language via the dup() or clone() methods: str = "I am a string." copy_of_str = str.clone str.object_id should not equal copy_of_str.object_id For your own objects, the default clone and dup methods perform shallow copies of state (references are copied). You would have to override clone or dup to do anything more complicated. class A attr_accessor :str def initialize(str) @str = str end end a = A.new("test") b = a.clone a.object_id != b.object_id but a.str.object_id == b.str.object_id Is this what you were getting at? -Doug |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Ilan Berci wrote: > In ruby, we don't assign to an instance as you mentioned, we assign > to a > variable that can hold any type. We therefore can't override the > assignment operator. > > BUT you can override an assignment operation.. such as Setter methods may look like assignment, but semantically they are method calls. I think it just confuses matters to call setter method invocation an 'assignment operation'. The desire to override assignment or define an assignment operator is generally indicative of some misunderstanding regarding Ruby's object model. Gary Wright |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> The desire to override assignment or define an assignment operator is
> generally indicative of some misunderstanding regarding Ruby's object > model. It's not a misunderstanding, I wanted to be sure that it was not possible to do it. I had a doubt because I discussed with a friend about python and this operator, and he tells me that is possible to override it. Today, after googling, my friend tells me that's not possible to override this operator ;-) > > Gary Wright Thanks Stephane |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Exactly.. since assignment in Ruby is really assigning a >reference<
to an object to a variable rather than copying an existing object to a new one. For example: a = "some String" b = a b << " more text" print "#{a}" Will print "some String more text" not "some String" because a and b refer to the same objects rather than distinct copies of an object that contains "some String". This is why the dup/clone methods exist. Ron Gary Wright wrote: > On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Ilan Berci wrote: >> In ruby, we don't assign to an instance as you mentioned, we assign >> to a >> variable that can hold any type. We therefore can't override the >> assignment operator. >> >> BUT you can override an assignment operation.. such as > > Setter methods may look like assignment, but semantically they are > method calls. I think it just confuses matters to call setter method > invocation an 'assignment operation'. > > The desire to override assignment or define an assignment operator is > generally indicative of some misunderstanding regarding Ruby's object > model. > > Gary Wright > |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|