|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi!
I am confused somehow with respect to "Generator#yield". The description (ri) is... >ri Generator#yield -------------------------------------------------------- Generator#yield yield(value) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yields an element to the generator. It's unclear for me what this means. I would expect that the Generator object delivers (yields) values by requirement through "Generator#current" or "Generator#next", but what should be yielded to an already existing Generator object? Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Dec 2, 5:03 pm, Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.oda...@wonado.de> wrote:
> Hi! > > I am confused somehow with respect to "Generator#yield". The description > (ri) is... > > >ri Generator#yield > > -------------------------------------------------------- Generator#yield > yield(value) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yields an element to the generator. > > It's unclear for me what this means. I would expect that the Generator > object delivers (yields) values by requirement through > "Generator#current" or "Generator#next", but what should be yielded to > an already existing Generator object? > > Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. It's for passing items *into* the generator's queue when the generator is created with the block form of Generator#new rather than from an existing enumerable. Example... require 'generator' g = Generator.new { | g | 1.upto(9) { | i | g.yield(i) } g.yield(10) } until g.end? p g.next end It probably should be spelled "inject" or something. Regards, Jordan |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Dec 2, 8:09 pm, MonkeeSage <MonkeeS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 5:03 pm, Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.oda...@wonado.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > I am confused somehow with respect to "Generator#yield". The description > > (ri) is... > > > >ri Generator#yield > > > -------------------------------------------------------- Generator#yield > > yield(value) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Yields an element to the generator. > > > It's unclear for me what this means. I would expect that the Generator > > object delivers (yields) values by requirement through > > "Generator#current" or "Generator#next", but what should be yielded to > > an already existing Generator object? > > > Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner > > -- > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > It's for passing items *into* the generator's queue when the generator > is created with the block form of Generator#new rather than from an > existing enumerable. Example... > > require 'generator' > g = Generator.new { | g | > 1.upto(9) { | i | > g.yield(i) > } > g.yield(10)} > > until g.end? > p g.next > end > > It probably should be spelled "inject" or something. err... ^^^^^^^^ = "insert" > Regards, > Jordan |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Jordan Callicoat wrote:
> On Dec 2, 5:03 pm, Wolfgang N�dasi-Donner <ed.oda...@wonado.de> wrote: >> It's unclear for me what this means. I would expect that the Generator >> object delivers (yields) values by requirement through >> "Generator#current" or "Generator#next", but what should be yielded to >> an already existing Generator object? > It's for passing items *into* the generator's queue when the generator > is created with the block form of Generator#new rather than from an > existing enumerable. Example... I see - the confusion came from the usual meaning of yield: call a block and deliver objects to it. Here it is used from a block into a method. btw. - at least in "PickAxe" the word "yield" it marked as a reserved word. Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Dec 3, 1:13 am, Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.oda...@wonado.de> wrote:
> Jordan Callicoat wrote: > > On Dec 2, 5:03 pm, Wolfgang N�dasi-Donner <ed.oda...@wonado.de> wrote: > >> It's unclear for me what this means. I would expect that the Generator > >> object delivers (yields) values by requirement through > >> "Generator#current" or "Generator#next", but what should be yielded to > >> an already existing Generator object? > > It's for passing items *into* the generator's queue when the generator > > is created with the block form of Generator#new rather than from an > > existing enumerable. Example... > > I see - the confusion came from the usual meaning of yield: call a block > and deliver objects to it. Here it is used from a block into a method. Yes... it really should be spelled differently. The idea is "send this item into the generator queue, so that the generator yields it (normal meaning) on the next iteration"...but it is confusing to have it named yield. > btw. - at least in "PickAxe" the word "yield" it marked as a reserved > word. Object attributes can share the same name as reserved words since they live in the namespace of the caller. Example... class Control def if(cond, yes, no) # 'if' is a reserved keyword if instance_eval(cond) then yes else no end end end Control.new.if("5>4", "ok", "broken") # => "ok" > Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. Regards, Jordan |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
David A. Black wrote:
> Reserved words can still be method names (e.g., class). It would be > nice to have a different word for this method, since it does feel a > bit backwards in relation to the other "yield", but as I recall there > have been discussions already and nothing that Matz liked was > proposed. I think the documentation of the method should be a little bit extended. The name of the method is not as bad as it looks like in the first moment, because it is used in the way to "yield" a value later to the user of the generator. After yours and Jordan's explanations everything is clear now. It's simply the documentation text "Yields an element to the generator", which leads to the assumption, that the method can be called elsewhere and delivers some objekt to the existing generator. Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|