|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi guys,
I tried to post this in ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org but nobody seems to be there. I'm new on documenting Ruby sources, I have some early opinions about RDoc but this time and want to ask you something. I tried to wrap code examples in comments using the following: # <tt> # def setUp # files << File.new() # end # </tt> But it doesn't work, it generates an ugly HTML like <tt> def setUp @appStates << AppState1.new() end </tt> What am I missing here? Thanks, Ubaldo |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I found the answer by accident, just adding extra spaces at the begin
of comment line, but now I have another question, I'm trying to place a labeled list in two lines like: # objInputData:: Optional. The input data required by the logic defined in # derived classes. It's commonly a hash map. Set to <tt>nil</tt> by default. Line two HTML is generated in typewriter mode. How could build a labeled list using multiple lines? Is there a nice site to find more information about RDoc? http://rdoc.sourceforge.net/doc/index.html seems to be insufficient. Thanks a lot. On Nov 12, 2007 7:48 PM, Ubaldo Villaseca <villas82@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > I tried to post this in ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org but nobody seems to be there. > I'm new on documenting Ruby sources, I have some early opinions about > RDoc but this time and want to ask you something. > I tried to wrap code examples in comments using the following: > # <tt> > # def setUp > # files << File.new() > # end > # </tt> > > But it doesn't work, it generates an ugly HTML like > <tt> def setUp > > @appStates << AppState1.new() > > end </tt> > > What am I missing here? > > Thanks, > Ubaldo > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I found the answer again, wow this list works great. Just adding or
removing spaces from the second line until RDoc generated the proper HTML, this is a try-and-error process: # objInputData:: Optional. The input data sent by the testcase caller and available to be used by the logic defined in # derived testcases. It's commonly a hash map. Set to <tt>nil</tt> by default. I'm impressed, RDoc is absolutely intuitive and well programmed. On Nov 12, 2007 9:09 PM, Ubaldo Villaseca <villas82@gmail.com> wrote: > I found the answer by accident, just adding extra spaces at the begin > of comment line, but now I have another question, I'm trying to place > a labeled list in two lines like: > > # objInputData:: Optional. The input data required by the logic defined in > # derived classes. It's commonly a hash map. Set > to <tt>nil</tt> by default. > > Line two HTML is generated in typewriter mode. How could build a > labeled list using multiple lines? Is there a nice site to find more > information about RDoc? http://rdoc.sourceforge.net/doc/index.html > seems to be insufficient. > > Thanks a lot. > > > On Nov 12, 2007 7:48 PM, Ubaldo Villaseca <villas82@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I tried to post this in ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org but nobody seems to be there. > > I'm new on documenting Ruby sources, I have some early opinions about > > RDoc but this time and want to ask you something. > > I tried to wrap code examples in comments using the following: > > # <tt> > > # def setUp > > # files << File.new() > > # end > > # </tt> > > > > But it doesn't work, it generates an ugly HTML like > > <tt> def setUp > > > > @appStates << AppState1.new() > > > > end </tt> > > > > What am I missing here? > > > > Thanks, > > Ubaldo > > > |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|