|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Note: parts of this message were removed by the gateway to make it a legal Usenet post.
Hi! Is Ruvi (http://ruvi.rubyforge.org/) still active? If not, is there any interest in re-implementing a subset of VIM in ruby? Advantages of this would be: (1) Make VIM more hackable. (A) I do not have the talent to understand the C portions of the VIM code (B) I don't like the vimscript language very much (2) Make the VIM-script langauge Ruby. More hackable. (I.e 1) (3) Easier to integrate with ruby-debug / irb (4) Make VIM better at editing Ruby code then Emacs. (I love VIM; but almost tempted to switch.) Thanks! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Note: parts of this message were removed by the gateway to make it a legal Usenet post.
Oh, I forgot one really important thing -- use Ruby to parse Ruby; to automatically get identing right for free On 11/3/07, redroofgreentree <redroofgreentree@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > Is Ruvi (http://ruvi.rubyforge.org/) still active? If not, is there any > interest in re-implementing a subset of VIM in ruby? > > Advantages of this would be: > (1) Make VIM more hackable. > (A) I do not have the talent to understand the C portions of the VIM > code > (B) I don't like the vimscript language very much > (2) Make the VIM-script langauge Ruby. More hackable. (I.e 1) > (3) Easier to integrate with ruby-debug / irb > (4) Make VIM better at editing Ruby code then Emacs. (I love VIM; but > almost > tempted to switch.) > > Thanks! > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Nov 4, 2007 7:37 AM, redroofgreentree <redroofgreentree@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, I forgot one really important thing -- use Ruby to parse Ruby; to > automatically get identing right for free > > > On 11/3/07, redroofgreentree <redroofgreentree@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > Is Ruvi (http://ruvi.rubyforge.org/) still active? If not, is there any > > interest in re-implementing a subset of VIM in ruby? > > > > Advantages of this would be: > > (1) Make VIM more hackable. > > (A) I do not have the talent to understand the C portions of the VIM > > code > > (B) I don't like the vimscript language very much > > (2) Make the VIM-script langauge Ruby. More hackable. (I.e 1) > > (3) Easier to integrate with ruby-debug / irb > > (4) Make VIM better at editing Ruby code then Emacs. (I love VIM; but > > almost > > tempted to switch.) > > > > Thanks! > > > Appealing ideas, I have no idea about ruvi though. Robert -- what do I think about Ruby? http://ruby-smalltalk.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
redroofgreentree wrote:
> Hi! > > Is Ruvi (http://ruvi.rubyforge.org/) still active? If not, is there any > interest in re-implementing a subset of VIM in ruby? > > Advantages of this would be: > (1) Make VIM more hackable. > (A) I do not have the talent to understand the C portions of the VIM code > (B) I don't like the vimscript language very much > (2) Make the VIM-script langauge Ruby. More hackable. (I.e 1) > (4) Make VIM better at editing Ruby code then Emacs. (I love VIM; but almost > tempted to switch.) As far as I know it is already possible to use Ruby (and also at least Python and (Mz)Scheme) language for writing Vim plugins. rubycomplete.vim from http://vim-ruby.rubyforge.org/ utilizes this feature. I do not know how far the current integration with Ruby goes, but may be it's usable enough (for e.g. writing ruby-debug-vim extension). If not I think that all the effort should be put into polishing the current integration - writing Vim plugins in Ruby (and/or other languages in General). Perfect Vim-Ruby integration would solve all problems you mentioned, I believe. Rewriting whole Vim into Ruby seems to be overkill to me. Probably impossible task On the other hand there are some clones written fromscratch, like viPlugin for Eclipse, jVi (NB plugin utilizes that AFAIK). I've spend some time on Eclipse plugin in the past and it was fun and there are a lot of Rubyists who could join something like Ruvi. So might be it's not that crazy idea Actually I should probably try the Ruvi(Activity Percentile: 83.31%) > (3) Easier to integrate with ruby-debug / irb If you would start this let me know. That was actually one of the goal of debug-commons project (http://debug-commons.rubyforge.org/) - or rather my secret wish... only if I have more time. Vim forever! ![]() m. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|