|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
so it seems like Google created Ruby Talk and anything posted to Ruby
Talk will post to comp.lang.ruby. but then people replying on the comp.lang.ruby will not get the answer through to the Ruby Talk poster... and then, Ruby Forum is even on top of Ruby Talk and comp.lang.ruby... so people replying in Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby will not get the answer through to Ruby Forum... So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so that it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in all 3 places? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so that
> it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in > all 3 places? I dont know but I rarely check on the mailing list these days with this forum here available. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sep 16, 5:41 am, Marc Heiler <sheve...@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> > So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so that > > it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in > > all 3 places? this is replying from comp.lang.ruby let's see where it will get to... |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sep 16, 5:41 am, Marc Heiler <sheve...@linuxmail.org> wrote: > > So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so that > > it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in > > all 3 places? this is replying from Google's Ruby Talk... let's see where it will get to... |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Marc Heiler wrote:
>> So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so that >> it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in >> all 3 places? Looks like Ruby Forum > ( Ruby Talk = comp.lang.ruby ) posting to Ruby Forumwill post to all three posting to Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby will automatically post to the other, but won't go to Ruby Forum. so if you ask a question here, there might be answer in comp.lang.ruby waiting for you which you didn't know about, unless you subscribe to Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby by email. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Summercool Summercool wrote:
> so if you ask a question here, there might be answer in comp.lang.ruby > waiting for you which you didn't know about, unless you subscribe to > Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby by email. so if you want an answer or a new posting to get to the widest audience group, always use Ruby Forum to post... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
--nextPart1194672.KaCYCRLeru
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Quoth Summercool Summercool: > Marc Heiler wrote: > >> So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so th= at > >> it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in > >> all 3 places? >=20 > Looks like >=20 > Ruby Forum > ( Ruby Talk =3D comp.lang.ruby ) >=20 > posting to Ruby Forumwill post to all three >=20 > posting to Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby will automatically post to the=20 > other, but won't go to Ruby Forum. >=20 > so if you ask a question here, there might be answer in comp.lang.ruby=20 > waiting for you which you didn't know about, unless you subscribe to=20 > Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby by email. I'm pretty sure ruby-forum and ruby-talk are inter-changeable (so long as you're subscribed) and I'd imagine with the ruby-talk <-> usenet gateway that the same goes for usenet, though I've not seen messages marked as from there. =2D-=20 Konrad Meyer <konrad@tylerc.org> http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/ --nextPart1194672.KaCYCRLeru Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG7SviCHB0oCiR2cwRAm6IAJ4wxBgAu/ZlMqDvq2AdwngeX6rO+ACgq827 FHIK75O5Ok3jKkAMMZzh2vc= =vGSe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1194672.KaCYCRLeru-- |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 16.09.2007 15:13, Konrad Meyer wrote:
> Quoth Summercool Summercool: >> Marc Heiler wrote: >>>> So... what is the good method? Start a new post in Ruby Forum so that >>>> it can get to the biggest audience group. But then, check answers in >>>> all 3 places? >> Looks like >> >> Ruby Forum > ( Ruby Talk = comp.lang.ruby ) >> >> posting to Ruby Forumwill post to all three >> >> posting to Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby will automatically post to the >> other, but won't go to Ruby Forum. >> >> so if you ask a question here, there might be answer in comp.lang.ruby >> waiting for you which you didn't know about, unless you subscribe to >> Ruby Talk or comp.lang.ruby by email. > > I'm pretty sure ruby-forum and ruby-talk are inter-changeable (so long as > you're subscribed) and I'd imagine with the ruby-talk <-> usenet gateway > that the same goes for usenet, though I've not seen messages marked as from > there. You are right. The only issue I am aware of ATM is that the news->email gateway has some delays on the news side. We probably can't do much about it but you should be aware of this. Kind regards robert |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|