|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On my Ruby 1.8.5 under Windows, I have:
C:> ruby -e 'puts File::SEPARATOR'=20 / Shouldn't it output '\' instead? Ronald --=20 Ronald Fischer <ronald.fischer@venyon.com> Phone: +49-89-452133-162 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Ronald Fischer wrote:
> On my Ruby 1.8.5 under Windows, I have: > > C:> ruby -e 'puts File::SEPARATOR' > / > > Shouldn't it output '\' instead? > > Ronald Nope, this variable correct because within ruby and its core libraries, everything can open files with forward slash separated paths. Try it. It is probably more reliable than using paths with backslashes (no potential for confusing the file separator with the escape character). Now, if you need to pass the path to a non-ruby app, then you will need to convert them to backslashes. Dan |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> Nope, this variable correct because within ruby and its core=20
> libraries,=20 > everything can open files with forward slash separated paths.=20 > Try it. I know, and that's what I am doing anyway. I just thought - after reading about File::SEPARATOR - that this would be a good way=20 to pass path parameters on to external processes. So this is not OS dependend, and within *every* Ruby implementation it is supposed to be a slash ... not that much sense defining it as a named constant then, isn't it? Ronald |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Ronald Fischer wrote:
>> Nope, this variable correct because within ruby and its core >> libraries, >> everything can open files with forward slash separated paths. >> Try it. > > I know, and that's what I am doing anyway. I just thought - after > reading about File::SEPARATOR - that this would be a good way > to pass path parameters on to external processes. > > So this is not OS dependend, and within *every* Ruby implementation > it is supposed to be a slash ... not that much sense defining > it as a named constant then, isn't it? > > Ronald > > You have a point, as I just can't imagine that the file separator used by Ruby internally will change any time soon (but who knows?). Thinking about valid use cases, I tried changing the value of this constant, only to find that File.joint doesn't use the value: >> File::SEPARATOR = "\\" (irb):3: warning: already initialized constant SEPARATOR => "\\" >> File.join("c:", "My Documents") => "c:/My Documents" >> File::SEPARATOR => "\\" I would have expected the result to be "c:\\My Documents" So the best use case (in my opinion) of this variable does not work. This behavior is in direct contradiction with the documentation for File.join, by the way (Ruby 1.8.6). I wonder whether this has been fixed in 1.9? It really does seem a bug that File.join does not use File::SEPARATOR (when the docs say it does). I looked at the c code of this function, and it does use a variable called "separator", but it seems changing File::SEPARATOR does not change the c variable. Dan |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sep 14, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Dan Zwell wrote:
> Ronald Fischer wrote: >> On my Ruby 1.8.5 under Windows, I have: >> C:> ruby -e 'puts File::SEPARATOR' / >> Shouldn't it output '\' instead? >> Ronald > > Nope, this variable correct because within ruby and its core > libraries, everything can open files with forward slash separated > paths. Try it. The truth is that Windows itself understands / as a path separator. It's just that many interfaces, like the DOS shells, do not. James Edward Gray II |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
From: "James Edward Gray II" <james@grayproductions.net> > On Sep 14, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Dan Zwell wrote: > >> Ronald Fischer wrote: >>> On my Ruby 1.8.5 under Windows, I have: >>> C:> ruby -e 'puts File::SEPARATOR' / >>> Shouldn't it output '\' instead? Windows ruby does define ALT_SEPARATOR: >> File::ALT_SEPARATOR => "\\" (Really a single backslash, self-escaped in the inspect.) >> Nope, this variable correct because within ruby and its core >> libraries, everything can open files with forward slash separated >> paths. Try it. > > The truth is that Windows itself understands / as a path separator. > It's just that many interfaces, like the DOS shells, do not. Just a potential word of caution going forward... I seem to recall reading on this list awhile back that the Unicode file API's in Windows *do not* accept forward slashes for path separators. (If that's true, then this may be an issue if Unicode filename support is ever added to win32 ruby... Although I suppose the conversion from / to \ could be handled behind the scenes.) Regards, Bill |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> You have a point, as I just can't imagine that the file=20
> separator used=20 > by Ruby internally will change any time soon (but who=20 > knows?).=20 I think this can be ruled out, because there probably won't be too many apps around which just *know* that Ruby accepts /, and have slashes hardcoded everywhere. I too have never thought about the existence of File::SEPARATOR as a constant, and came accross it only when I wanted to construct file names for external applications, which should be OS independent. Ronald |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> The truth is that Windows itself understands / as a path separator. =20
> It's just that many interfaces, like the DOS shells, do not. And that's exactly the problem: When shelling out to external programs, and / is there usually interpreted as leading in an option (like "-" does in Posix like systems). Ronald |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|