|
| PORTAIL | ANNUAIRE | ARTICLES | COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS | DEVIS | FORUMS | RÉDUCTEUR D'URL |
|
18/01/2008, 20h07
|
#1 |
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
PHP equivalent to Perl's !~
I haven't seen any documentation on this, and searching for !~ has
been fruitless. Any suggestions, or is there no equivalent? |
|
|
18/01/2008, 21h06
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: PHP equivalent to Perl's !~
..oO(wes.waters@gmail.com)
>I haven't seen any documentation on this, and searching for !~ has >been fruitless. Any suggestions, or is there no equivalent? What about !preg_match()? Just a guess, since I don't use Perl. Micha |
|
|
|
19/01/2008, 10h50
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: PHP equivalent to Perl's !~
Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(wes.waters@gmail.com) > >>I haven't seen any documentation on this, and searching for !~ has been >>fruitless. Any suggestions, or is there no equivalent? > > What about !preg_match()? > Just a guess, since I don't use Perl. Yep, that's correct. Perl: if ($foo !~ /bar/) { print "match\n"; } PHP: if (!preg_match('/bar/', $foo)) { print "match\n"; } -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS [Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux] [OS: Linux 2.6.17.14-mm-desktop-9mdvsmp, up 19 days, 22:02.] Ham vs Bacon vs Pork http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/01/17/pork-etc/ |
|
|
|
19/01/2008, 16h08
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: PHP equivalent to Perl's !~
Toby A Inkster wrote:
> Michael Fesser wrote: >> .oO(wes.waters@gmail.com) >> >>> I haven't seen any documentation on this, and searching for !~ has been >>> fruitless. Any suggestions, or is there no equivalent? >> What about !preg_match()? >> Just a guess, since I don't use Perl. > > Yep, that's correct. > > Perl: > > if ($foo !~ /bar/) > { > print "match\n"; > } > > PHP: > > if (!preg_match('/bar/', $foo)) > { > print "match\n"; > } > > And apart from reminding me of 'pregnancy' how much more readable the PHP is! |
|
|
|
19/01/2008, 23h44
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: PHP equivalent to Perl's !~
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> And apart from reminding me of 'pregnancy' how much more readable the > PHP is! Frankly I find the Perl version far more elegant. The lack of redundant quote marks and nested brackets if far more pleasing to the eye IMHO. Indeed, in Perl you could use: print "match\n" if $foo !~ /bar/; or even: print "match\n" unless $foo =~ /bar/; Either seem pretty readable to me. -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS [Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux] [OS: Linux 2.6.17.14-mm-desktop-9mdvsmp, up 20 days, 10:51.] Ham vs Bacon vs Pork http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/01/17/pork-etc/ |
|
|
 |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|
