|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I have this iframe on a page:
<IFRAME name="inlineframe" src="http://easyquestion.net/quiz/ quiz_source.php?code=thinkagain" width=400 height=285 marginwidth=0 marginheight=0 frameborder=0 scrolling=auto></IFRAME> Note that the src has a parameter. This parameter can be is to be found in $_GET[code] in the src program when I use Mozilla Firefox, but not when I use IE6. Can src parameters not be sent when IE is used? Regards, Jan Nordgreen |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:53:07 +0100, damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com>
wrote: > I have this iframe on a page: > > <IFRAME name="inlineframe" src="http://easyquestion.net/quiz/ > quiz_source.php?code=thinkagain" width=400 height=285 marginwidth=0 > marginheight=0 frameborder=0 scrolling=auto></IFRAME> > > Note that the src has a parameter. This parameter can be is to be > found in $_GET[code] in the src program when I use Mozilla Firefox, > but not when I use IE6. > > Can src parameters not be sent when IE is used? It should (and normally does here). Have you got a live example/test showing this problem? -- Rik Wasmus |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
http://simpler-solutions.net/pmachin...thinkagain.php
The top part called Daily Puzzle does not work in IE6. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:04:59 +0100, damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com>
wrote: > http://simpler-solutions.net/pmachin...thinkagain.php > > The top part called Daily Puzzle does not work in IE6. <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php? Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML instead of HTML though. -- Rik Wasmus |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news p.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php? Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML instead of HTML though. What?! But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing. What about using XHTML makes this harder? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Thank you for your answer!
I created a simpler test page, and now it works in IE6: http://easyquestion.net/quiz/quiz_test.html Regards, Jan Nordgreen |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:44:22 +0100, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net>
wrote: > "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news p.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...> > <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php? > > Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed > in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML > instead of HTML though. Hmm, quoting gone wrong? > What?! > But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing. > What about using XHTML makes this harder? Validating to true XHTML (i.e. CDATA in script/style etc., starting with <?xml ?>). Now, XHTML intended and served as tagsoup HTML, that's not so much harder, no. -- Rik Wasmus |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news p.t1d0h4x85bnjuv@metallium.lan...On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:44:22 +0100, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote: > "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news p.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...> > <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php? > > Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed > in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML > instead of HTML though. Hmm, quoting gone wrong? Yup - gave up trying to fix it every time I reply to one of your posts. Just figgered - either you'd change your settings, or we'd learn to live with it. Kinda like top-posting. > But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing. > What about using XHTML makes this harder? Validating to true XHTML (i.e. CDATA in script/style etc., starting with <?xml ?>). Now, XHTML intended and served as tagsoup HTML, that's not so much harder, no. "Tagsoup HTML"? I've been using XHTML (albeit - not as religiously as I mean to). Scripting works; posts and gets work; spiders work. I've had NO problem with validation. What about XHTML makes that harder? For what sinkhole am I headed? |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|