I have this iframe on a page:

<IFRAME name="inlineframe" src="http://easyquestion.net/quiz/
quiz_source.php?code=thinkagain" width=400 height=285 marginwidth=0
marginheight=0 frameborder=0 scrolling=auto></IFRAME>

Note that the src has a parameter. This parameter can be is to be
found in $_GET[code] in the src program when I use Mozilla Firefox,
but not when I use IE6.

Can src parameters not be sent when IE is used?

Regards,

Jan Nordgreen

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:53:07 +0100, damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have this iframe on a page:
>
> <IFRAME name="inlineframe" src="http://easyquestion.net/quiz/
> quiz_source.php?code=thinkagain" width=400 height=285 marginwidth=0
> marginheight=0 frameborder=0 scrolling=auto></IFRAME>
>
> Note that the src has a parameter. This parameter can be is to be
> found in $_GET[code] in the src program when I use Mozilla Firefox,
> but not when I use IE6.
>
> Can src parameters not be sent when IE is used?

It should (and normally does here). Have you got a live example/test
showing this problem?
--
Rik Wasmus

http://simpler-solutions.net/pmachin...thinkagain.php

The top part called Daily Puzzle does not work in IE6.

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:04:59 +0100, damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com>
wrote:

> http://simpler-solutions.net/pmachin...thinkagain.php
>
> The top part called Daily Puzzle does not work in IE6.

<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php?

Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed
in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML
instead of HTML though.
--
Rik Wasmus

"Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsp.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...

<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php?

Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed
in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML
instead of HTML though.

What?!
But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing.
What about using XHTML makes this harder?

Thank you for your answer!

I created a simpler test page, and now it works in IE6:

http://easyquestion.net/quiz/quiz_test.html

Regards,

Jan Nordgreen

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:44:22 +0100, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net>
wrote:

> "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> newsp.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...
>
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php?
>
> Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed
> in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML
> instead of HTML though.

Hmm, quoting gone wrong?

> What?!
> But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing.
> What about using XHTML makes this harder?

Validating to true XHTML (i.e. CDATA in script/style etc., starting with
<?xml ?>). Now, XHTML intended and served as tagsoup HTML, that's not so
much harder, no.
--
Rik Wasmus

"Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsp.t1d0h4x85bnjuv@metallium.lan...
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:44:22 +0100, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net>
wrote:

> "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> newsp.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...
>
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php?
>
> Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed
> in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML
> instead of HTML though.

Hmm, quoting gone wrong?

Yup - gave up trying to fix it every time I reply to one of your posts.
Just figgered - either you'd change your settings, or we'd learn to live
with it.
Kinda like top-posting.


> But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing.
> What about using XHTML makes this harder?

Validating to true XHTML (i.e. CDATA in script/style etc., starting with
<?xml ?>). Now, XHTML intended and served as tagsoup HTML, that's not so
much harder, no.

"Tagsoup HTML"?
I've been using XHTML (albeit - not as religiously as I mean to).
Scripting works; posts and gets work; spiders work.
I've had NO problem with validation.

What about XHTML makes that harder?
For what sinkhole am I headed?

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...up=0&verbose=1

I used XHTML 1.0 Transitional and am down to 1 error. (When I started
I had 246 errors!)

The last error is:

Line 380, Column 266: there is no attribute "onerror".

....his page" id="clustrMapsImg" onerror="this.onerror=null;
this.src='http://clu

An image tag with attribute onerror creates an error. Why?

However, http://simpler-solutions.net/pmachin...thinkagain.php
still does not work with its iframe in IE6. That was my initial
question, and I still don't know why. It works in Mozilla Firefox.

Regards,

Jan Nordgreen

"However, http://simpler-solutions.net/pmachin...thinkagain.php
still does not work with its iframe in IE6. That was my initial
question, and I still don't know why. It works in Mozilla Firefox. "

That problem has now been solved!

IE6 allows parameters in the src argument in the iframe tag. The
reason why it did not work in IE6 was that I stored the argument in a
session variable and only checked the value the second time the file
was run and I ran Privacy on Medium so , that is the session
variables, were not stored.

Now I have to find out how to store the session variables on the
server so I do not depend on browser settings for .

Regards,

Jan Nordgreen

damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com> wrote in
<1194546511.776488.72270@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.c om>:
> I used XHTML 1.0 Transitional and am down to 1 error.
> (When I started I had 246 errors!)

Using XHTML in WWW context is an overplay.

Using Transitional-anything for new content leaves a lot of
bad aji.

--
"DAD! DID YOU KNOW THERE WERE RATS UP HERE?"
"'s a'ight, Mortin dun' bite."

> Using XHTML in WWW context is an overplay.

What is "WWW context"?
When is XTHML doc type used?

Regards,

Jan Nordgreen

On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:06:21 +0100, damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Using XHTML in WWW context is an overplay.
>
> What is "WWW context"?
> When is XTHML doc type used?

In environments you can be sure the UA can cope with real XHTML, so no
MSIE6 (haven't checked MSIE7's coping with text/xhtml+xml yet). That would
be limited to intranets and/or specialised sites able to require
particular UA's from their users in a limited access site (user
credentials are checked, with username/password, known static IP, or any
other means).

The only time I apply pseudo XHTML for the WWW is when a client wants to
incorporate Google maps with directions, which pretends to require XHTML.
--
Rik Wasmus

What is UA?

damezumari <jannordgreen@gmail.com> wrote in
<1194602781.103012.31610@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.c om>:
>> Using XHTML in WWW context is an overplay.
>
> What is "WWW context"?

Publicly available content deployed on the internet and
served over HTTP. As opposed to something deployed in a
closed, controlled environment, such as an application on a
web platform used internally by company employees.

> When is XTHML doc type used?

XHTML is sometimes used as a backend representation of the
content served to the end-users as HTML, or for exchanging
markup between web services. If it is possible to ensure
that only XHTML-aware UA's are used for accessing the
documents, XHTML is occasionally used in web applications
similar to what I mentioned earlier in the post.

The reasons for this have been discussed unto death many
times in the past. GIYF.

--
....also, I submit that we all must honourably commit seppuku
right now rather than serve the Dark Side by producing the
HTML 5 spec.

damezumari wrote:

> What is UA?

UA = User Agent, ie. your browser.

--
Kim André Akerø
- kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com
(remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)

On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:01:29 +0100, Kim André Akerø
<kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> wrote:

> damezumari wrote:
>
>> What is UA?
>
> UA = User Agent, ie. your browser.

In most HTTP/PHP cases on the www a browser, it might be something else
though...
--
Rik Wasmus

Sanders Kaufman:

> "Tagsoup HTML"?

Also 'tag salad'.

A healthy diet would seem to be as acquired a taste as a good dram.

http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www.html#essential

--
Jock