|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
http://dbug.ospinto.com/
Take a look at this and see if this doesn't you when you just can't see waht's the matter with your data! I spent 2 years on a 'var debug' to me see what a variable contains and what PHP thought the type was. I pitched mine when I found this one! And... as usual... I had to make a *small* changes to it. Theyshould incorporated into the next version sometime soon. Hope this s you, somehow! Walter |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Looks good to me!
I'll give it a try and see how goes it. I too havelost count of how many times I've debugged for hours to find a simple variable screwing up the world for me :P |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:31:01 +0100, otrWalter@gmail.com
<otrWalter@gmail.com> wrote: > http://dbug.ospinto.com/ > > Take a look at this and see if this doesn't you when you just > can't see waht's the matter with your data! > > I spent 2 years on a 'var debug' to me see what a variable > contains and what PHP thought the type was. I pitched mine when I > found this one! > > And... as usual... I had to make a *small* changes to it. They> should incorporated into the next version sometime soon. > > Hope this s you, somehow! Hmm, I'll check it out soon. In the mean while: xdebug also changes the var_dump function quite pleasantly. -- Rik Wasmus |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
otrWalter@gmail.com wrote:
> http://dbug.ospinto.com/ > > Take a look at this and see if this doesn't you when you just > can't see waht's the matter with your data! > > I spent 2 years on a 'var debug' to me see what a variable > contains and what PHP thought the type was. I pitched mine when I > found this one! > > And... as usual... I had to make a *small* changes to it. They> should incorporated into the next version sometime soon. > > Hope this s you, somehow! > > Walter > Did you perchance make a *small* change so that it displays the var name for non-structured variables ? AFAIK, now if you display a non-structured variable, it only displays the value, not the name. bill |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> AFAIK, now if you display a non-structured variable, it only
> displays the value, not the name. Correct. I've updated that part of the class. "non-structured variables" now display in the same format as "structured", right down to the name of the variable, and even its TYPE! ![]() Give him a few days to update his site to incorporate what I've sent him. Walter |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Nov 5, 12:05 pm, "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, I'll check it out soon. In the mean while: xdebug also changes the > var_dump function quite pleasantly. Yes it does. I took a look at what Xdebug does and decided to "steal" an idea from what they did. I added the LENGTH a string variable to the display. Numbers, booleans and NULL didn't need to show their length. Walter |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
otrWalter@gmail.com wrote:
>> AFAIK, now if you display a non-structured variable, it only >> displays the value, not the name. > > Correct. > > I've updated that part of the class. "non-structured variables" now > display in the same format as "structured", right down to the name of > the variable, and even its TYPE! ![]() > > Give him a few days to update his site to incorporate what I've sent > him. > > Walter > Thanks Walter. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|