Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>> Terrorists are generally defined as those who take action against
>> non-combatants, especially civilians.
>
> And when a squad of US soldiers rapes a girl and murders her family,
> then sets fire to the house and threatens the neighbors - that's
> "nation-building".

Sigh. This bullshit again. I wondered when you would come up with it.

These guys were tried and convicted of their crimes. Maybe we should
hold you accountable for everything anyone in your city did. After all,
you live there, also.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Rik Wasmus wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:07:43 +0200, Jerry Stuckle
>
>>> We've made it safer. Just like we did in WW II.
>>
>> And you consume like hell. We're happy to offload our products unto
>> you untill the bubble bursts .
>
> Perhaps the US should change it's slogan from "United We Stand" to "Do
> you want fries with that?".

Yea, or maybe we should just kill all the idiots like you and make this
world a better place.

"Would you like to be fried with that"?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> Oh, you don't know the difference between Iraq and Viet Nam? I
>> suggest you go back and study your history.
>>
>> Unlike you, I know first hand about View Nam.
>> Crawl back in your hole, troll.
>
> I've noticed that the low-lifes who behaved so poorly during that
> illegal war are the same ones who insist the Iraqis must be slaughtered
> as well.
>
> I just thank GOD y'all are a dying breed, and that your leaders are
> being tried and convicted for what they do.
>
>
>

Got it wrong again, idiot. We never said anything about slaughtering
Iraqis. In fact, we saved them from being slaughtered by a tyrant - one
who was convicted of killing millions of his own citizens.

And by who's definition is this war illegal? Yours? We already know
where your head is. The U.S.? Which laws. The U.N.? Why haven't they
charged us?

Just more bullshit, Sanders.

We are the strongest country in the world because we are the best
country in the world. And unlike your chicken-shit leaders, we will
stand up to terrorists.

Every time you post a message here you're sounding more and more like
the terrorists. So maybe we need to hold you responsible for the
bombings in Madrid, London, New York....

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

..oO(Jerry Stuckle)

>We are the strongest country in the world because we are the best
>country in the world. And unlike your chicken-shit leaders, we will
>stand up to terrorists.

*ROFL*

Sigged.

And you're wondering why you have been attacked? With such an attitude
the next 9/11 is just a question of time, that's for sure.

Micha

--
"We are the strongest country in the world because we are the best
country in the world. And unlike your chicken-shit leaders, we will
stand up to terrorists." (Jerry Stuckle in clp)

..oO(Jerry Stuckle)

>Michael Fesser wrote:
>
>> You know the song "Deja Vu" by John Fogerty?
>>
>> http://www.oldielyrics.com/lyrics/jo...ver_again.html
>>
>Oh, you don't know the difference between Iraq and Viet Nam? I suggest
>you go back and study your history.

I suggest you go back and study the lyrics.

>Unlike you, I know first hand about View Nam.

The artist _also_ knows first hand about it. Otherwise he wouldn't have
written the song (which BTW was written after the Iraq war began).

Micha

..oO(Jerry Stuckle)

>Michael Fesser wrote:
>> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>>
>>> How many innocent civilians?
>>
>> Not many. Just some millions. Nothing special.
>
>Yes? And you have some proof of that? Or are you just talking out your
>ass? I suspect the latter.

Of course you do, because offending people is the only you can do. Not
only here, but in nearly every third thread. Everyone who doesn't agree
with you or doesn't want to sleep with your president in his Or^Hval
Office is a troll, an ass hole or something like that.

When God handed out social competence, was it you who shouted the
loudest "Not me, not me!"?

>Try again - with some real facts.
>
>And he isn't doing a thing to _your_ European civil rights. And all the
>rest of your statements are full of even more crap.
>
>I really suggest you get some facts before you pull your head out of
>your ass again.

As I said - you could find proof if you _want_ to find it (for all the
things I said). There are enough resources available. But of course
since they are just websites written by one person or maybe a few, they
don't have any credibility and are not worth the bytes. In fact the only
real source of truth is whitehouse.gov. Sorry, I should have known that.

Just wondering - if the US would ever get a black president - would he
leave the White House as it is?

>> You can find enough resources in the web if you _want_ to find them.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War
>
>And you think that's the truth? ROFLMAO. It's ONE PERSON'S (or maybe a
>few people's) opinion.

I wouldn't call 150 references "a few people's opinions". And obviously
you think that even Amnesty International, Washington Post, CNN, BBC,
CBS, UN and whatever they're called don't have any credibility.

>I could write an article in wikipedia saying Michael Fesser is a horses
>ass. It would have more creditability that what you're pointing out.

Of course you can do that, I don't have a problem with that.
Of course you would also have to accept the consequences.

>But I forget - you believe everything you read on the internet.

Obviously you believe everything you see on TV. And just in case you
still live back in the 1850's - even reputable and credible news paper
magazines, scientific articles and such are available on the net. You
just have to know _where_ to search.

>> And before you laugh at Wikipedia or deny their credibility - there are
>> more than 150 references for all the claims and statements made in that
>> article. "Oil" is a major section in it - and it is proved.
>
>Yep, and how "accurate" are those references? Most are other websites
>with just as little credibility.

I knew you would say that.

>And hey - I didn't bring up the topic.

Neither did I. I just can't stand your damn arrogance and egoism.

>And no one asked you to stick
>your fat ass in here.
>
>If there's anyone who's a troll, it's you.

Thanks for that, old man. If arrogance would squeak, you would have to
walk around with an oil can all day.

Micha

ay beecee wrote:
>
>
> Bush is a moron.
What took you so long?

Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>> Terrorists are generally defined as those who take action against
>> non-combatants, especially civilians.
>
> And when a squad of US soldiers rapes a girl and murders her family,
> then sets fire to the house and threatens the neighbors - that's
> "nation-building".
Yup. Like the Russkies did to East Germany, and the Germans did to Poland.

Spreads the genes around a bit.