|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I need a compiler that
1. can generate 32 and 64-bit code, (64-bit code that will work on an AMD as well as Intel) 2. Doesn't require the enduser to install .Net to run the program (in other words, the code is self-contained) 3. generated code is not in multiple required parts (like the new Borland C++ compiler series which requires a runtime file to be distributed with the EXE - no explanation on how to combine them into a single file). I want a single .EXE file. no messes. no DLL's. no extra runtime files. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
jmichae3@yahoo.com wrote:
> I need a compiler that > > 1. can generate 32 and 64-bit code, (64-bit code that will work on an > AMD as well as Intel) > You're asking in the wrong place, try a windows group. -- Ian Collins. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 2008-06-04 10:51, jmichae3@yahoo.com wrote:
> I need a compiler that > > 1. can generate 32 and 64-bit code, (64-bit code that will work on an > AMD as well as Intel) > > 2. Doesn't require the enduser to install .Net to run the program (in > other words, the code is self-contained) > > 3. generated code is not in multiple required parts (like the new > Borland C++ compiler series which requires a runtime file to be > distributed with the EXE - no explanation on how to combine them into > a single file). > I want a single .EXE file. no messes. no DLL's. no extra runtime > files. Visual Studio 2008 Express, and read the following article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9yb4317s.aspx -- Erik Wikström |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
jmichae3@yahoo.com wrote:
> I need a compiler that > > 1. can generate 32 and 64-bit code, (64-bit code that will work on an > AMD as well as Intel) > > 2. Doesn't require the enduser to install .Net to run the program (in > other words, the code is self-contained) > > 3. generated code is not in multiple required parts (like the new > Borland C++ compiler series which requires a runtime file to be > distributed with the EXE - no explanation on how to combine them into > a single file). > I want a single .EXE file. no messes. no DLL's. no extra runtime > files. I use MinGW on a 32-bit Windows XP box to do this. Executables from this setup run on 32-bit Windows and 64-bit Windows as WOW (Windows on Windows) emulation on the 64-bit systems takes care of the details. Statically link and you'll be self-contained. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|