go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........

preeto50@gmail.com wrote:
> go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........

Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.

On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> preet...@gmail.com wrote:
> > go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>
> Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
> can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.

He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know
what he is doing.

On Dec 31, 2:41am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
> On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> > preet...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>
> > Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
> > can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
>
> He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know
> what he is doing.

Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......

<preeto50@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:da0635e9-d34a-424e-a45c-0a3733cb32c7@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........

Why?

preeto50@gmail.com wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
>> On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>
>>> preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>>
>>> Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
>>> can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
>>
>> He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
>> know what he is doing.
>
> Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......

The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with badly
designed cluttered sites.

--
Jim Langston
tazmaster@rocketmail.com

On Jan 1, 2:19am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> preet...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
> >> On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> >>> preet...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>
> >>> Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
> >>> can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
>
> >> He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
> >> know what he is doing.
>
> > Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
>
> The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with badly
> designed cluttered sites.
>
> --
> Jim Langston
> tazmas...@rocketmail.com

give some tips how to design good site.............

pmp wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2:19 am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
>>>> On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>>
>>>>> Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong
>>>>> I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
>>
>>>> He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
>>>> know what he is doing.
>>
>>> Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
>>
>> The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with
>> badly designed cluttered sites.
>>
>> --
>> Jim Langston
>> tazmas...@rocketmail.com
>
> give some tips how to design good site.............

Sorry, pmp, designing good sites is off topic here. If you have
a C++ question/announcement, do share.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask