Hi Everyone,

I have the following code,

class Sample
{
public: static int i;
void f()
{
Sample::i = 5;
}
};

int main()
{
Sample obj;
obj.f(); // Causes linker error saying unresolved
external symbol Sample::i...
}

It works fine, if the following statement is added before main and
after the class declaration,

int Sample::i;

Does the above statement take care of memory allocation for the
static member variable?

Rahul wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have the following code,
>
> class Sample
> {
> public: static int i;
> void f()
> {
> Sample::i = 5;

There is no need to qualify the name 'i' here, BTW.

> }
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> Sample obj;
> obj.f(); // Causes linker error saying unresolved
> external symbol Sample::i...
> }
>
> It works fine, if the following statement is added before main and
> after the class declaration,
>
> int Sample::i;
>
> Does the above statement take care of memory allocation for the
> static member variable?

Yes.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

Rahul wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have the following code,
>
> class Sample
> {
> public: static int i;
> void f()
> {
> Sample::i = 5;
> }
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> Sample obj;
> obj.f(); // Causes linker error saying unresolved
> external symbol Sample::i...
> }
>
> It works fine, if the following statement is added before main and
> after the class declaration,
>
> int Sample::i;
>
> Does the above statement take care of memory allocation for the
> static member variable?

Yes. See FAQ 10.11 http://parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.11