Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.invalid> writes:
> Keith Thompson said:
>
>> pereges <Broli00@gmail.com> writes:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> if(a[i] <= 50)
>>> left_size++;
>>> if(a[i] > 50)
>>> right_size++;
>>
>> The second test is unnecessary.
>
> s/is unnecessary/can be replaced by else/
>
> <snip>

Right.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:

> Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.invalid> writes:
>> Keith Thompson said:
>>
>>> pereges <Broli00@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> if(a[i] <= 50)
>>>> left_size++;
>>>> if(a[i] > 50)
>>>> right_size++;
>>>
>>> The second test is unnecessary.
>>
>> s/is unnecessary/can be replaced by else/
>>
>> <snip>
>
> Right.

I prefer your correction because the whole second test *is*
unnecessary. The OP needs to write 'size_of_array - left_size' in the
allocation but that is all. At first reading I thought that was what
you intended.

--
Ben.