I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?

Bill

Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?
>
sizeof(size_t)?

--
Ian Collins.

"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.com> wrote in message
news:bj9pj.6165$qI.2153@trnddc03...
> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?

its a typedef so why can't you just do sizeof(size-t)

"Ian Collins" <ian-news@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:60klvjF1qsb4fU18@mid.individual.net...
> Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?
>>
> sizeof(size_t)?
>
It would have to be that obvious ok thanks.

Bill

Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?

You may kick yourself when you see how trivial this is:

#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
printf("[Output]\n"
"For this implementation, sizeof(size_t) is %zu\n",
sizeof(size_t));
return 0;
}

[Output]
For this implementation, sizeof(size_t) is 4

MisterE wrote:
> "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.com> wrote in message
> news:bj9pj.6165$qI.2153@trnddc03...
>> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?
>
> its a typedef so why can't you just do sizeof(size-t)

unless the variable 'size' and 't' are declared, the type of their
difference is not very well defined, is it?

On 2ÔÂ3ÈÕ, ÉÏÎç10ʱ29·Ö, "Bill Cunningham" <nos...@nspam.com> wrote:
> "Ian Collins" <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:60klvjF1qsb4fU18@mid.individual.net...> Bill Cunningham wrote:
> >> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?
>
> > sizeof(size_t)?
>
> It would have to be that obvious ok thanks.
>
> Bill

On Feb 3, 5:06 am, Martin Ambuhl <mamb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> MisterE wrote:
> > "Bill Cunningham" <nos...@nspam.com> wrote in message
> >news:bj9pj.6165$qI.2153@trnddc03...
> >> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?
>
> > its a typedef so why can't you just do sizeof(size-t)
>
> unless the variable 'size' and 't' are declared, the type of their
> difference is not very well defined, is it?

Is it not?
#define size 42
#define t 6
As far as I know, 'size' and 't' in my example are not variables.

Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> I would like to check the sizeof size_t. Anyone have a suggestion?

size_t is a type. Therefore sizof needs it in parenthesis.

n = sizeof (size_t);

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com