|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Please forgive us for any disturbance, but we have an important
subject to address to you regarding FAITH, and we Don't intend to overload your email with unnecessary messages... What is the Quraan? It is the final revelation of the will of Almighty God's to all of mankind, which was conveyed through the Angel Gabriel, in Arabic, to the Prophet Muhammad in its sounds, words and meanings. The Qur'aan, sometimes spelled Koran, was relayed to the Prophet's companions, which they memorised verbatim, and which has been publicly and continually recited by them and their successors until the present day. In short, the Qur'aan is the book of guidance from God par excellence. The Qur'aan is still memorised and taught by millions of people. The language of the Qur'aan, Arabic, is still a living language to millions of people, so unlike the scriptures of other religions, the Qur'aan is still read in its original language by countless millions of people. The Qu'raan is a living miracle in the Arabic language; and is known to be inimitable in its style, form and spiritual impact. God's final revelation to mankind, the Qur'aan, was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad over a period of 23 years. The Qur'aan, in contrast to many other religious books, was always thought to be the Word of God by those who believed in it, i.e. it wasn't something decreed by a religious council many years after being written. Also, the Qu'raan was recited publicly in front of both the Muslim and non- Muslim communities during the life of the Prophet Muhammad. The entire Qur'aan was completely written down in the lifetime of the Prophet, and numerous companions of the Prophet memorised the entire Qur'aan word-for-word as it was revealed. So unlike other scriptures, the Qur'aan was always in the hands of the common believers, it was always thought to be God's word and, due to wide-spread memorisation, it was perfectly preserved. In regards to the teachings of the Qur'aan - it is a universal scripture, and it is addressed to all of mankind, and not to a particular tribe or "chosen people". The message that it brings is nothing new, but the same message of all of the prophets - submit to Almighty God and worship Him alone. As such, God's revelation in the Qur'aan focuses on teaching human beings the importance of believing in the Unity of God and framing their lives around the guidance which He has sent. Additionally, the Qur'aan contains the stories of the previous prophets, such as Abraham, Noah, Moses and Jesus; as well as many commands and prohibitions from God. In modern times in which so many people are caught up in doubt, spiritual despair and "political correctness", the Qur'aanic teachings offer solutions to the emptiness of our lives and the turmoil that is gripping the world today. ........... Prepared by: Abu 'Iyaad For more information about Islam http://www.imanway1.com/files/ExploreIslam.htm http://www.freewebtown.com/trouth/1.html |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:15:16 -0800,
ياهادي أهدنا وأهدي بنا (أم نادر) wrote: > What is the Quraan? An utterly obsolete text, whose major claim to fame is to be a source of hatred, intolerance and ignorance. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Ivar Rosquist wrote:
> An utterly Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups they infest. Brian |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes:
> Ivar Rosquist wrote: > > >> An utterly > > Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups they > infest. > And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your own advice. Thank you. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Richard wrote:
> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: > >> Ivar Rosquist wrote: >> >> >>> An utterly >> Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups they >> infest. >> > > And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your > own advice. Thank you. At least /one/ person has to tell the responder-to-spam not to do it. its like shushing someone in a Library. -- Mark McIntyre CLC FAQ <http://c-faq.com/> CLC readme: <http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt> |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Richard wrote:
> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: > > Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups > > they infest. > > > > And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your > own advice. Thank you. Ah, the troll morphs again. *replonk* Brian |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In article <6093cdF1pk1pfU1@mid.individual.net>,
Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> wrote: >Richard wrote: > >> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: > >> > Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups >> > they infest. >> > >> >> And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your >> own advice. Thank you. > > >Ah, the troll morphs again. > >*replonk* > > > > >Brian You must really have the worst newsreader/killfile mechanism in the world - or, as we all are pretty much convinced, be completely computer-inept - you should probably consider ordering some of those CDs that are advertised on late night TV. I certainly have no trouble keeping Richard on my "select list", as he is one of the small group who actually post stuff that is fun to read. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 29 Jan 2008 at 18:25, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <6093cdF1pk1pfU1@mid.individual.net>, > Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> wrote: >>Richard wrote: >> >>> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: >> >>> > Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups >>> > they infest. >>> > >>> >>> And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your >>> own advice. Thank you. >> >> >>Ah, the troll morphs again. >> >>*replonk* >> >> >> >> >>Brian > > You must really have the worst newsreader/killfile mechanism in the > world - or, as we all are pretty much convinced, be completely > computer-inept - you should probably consider ordering some of those CDs > that are advertised on late night TV. > > I certainly have no trouble keeping Richard on my "select list", as he > is one of the small group who actually post stuff that is fun to read. Yes... and even if he wasn't fun, at least he'd be a change from the usual drivel of "OT, not C, C doesn't have a stack, that's not portable, blah blah". Back to Richard's original point, of course there is a clear double standard: one rule for The Clique and one rule for everyone else. In the last two days, Heathfield and the Loser have both responded to messages that are clearly spam - but that's OK, because they're in the in-crowd. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Antoninus Twink <nospam@nospam.invalid> writes:
> On 29 Jan 2008 at 18:25, Kenny McCormack wrote: >> In article <6093cdF1pk1pfU1@mid.individual.net>, >> Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>Richard wrote: >>> >>>> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: >>> >>>> > Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups >>>> > they infest. >>>> > >>>> >>>> And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your >>>> own advice. Thank you. >>> >>> >>>Ah, the troll morphs again. >>> >>>*replonk* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Brian >> >> You must really have the worst newsreader/killfile mechanism in the >> world - or, as we all are pretty much convinced, be completely >> computer-inept - you should probably consider ordering some of those CDs >> that are advertised on late night TV. >> >> I certainly have no trouble keeping Richard on my "select list", as he >> is one of the small group who actually post stuff that is fun to read. > > Yes... and even if he wasn't fun, at least he'd be a change from the > usual drivel of "OT, not C, C doesn't have a stack, that's not portable, > blah blah". > > Back to Richard's original point, of course there is a clear double > standard: one rule for The Clique and one rule for everyone else. In the > last two days, Heathfield and the Loser have both responded to messages > that are clearly spam - but that's OK, because they're in the > in-crowd. Brian (I never knew a Bwian who wasn't as thick as two short planks and boring with it), is one of the worst. Constantly net nannying. Knows jack about C and constantly jumping to the defence of the clique when some of us try to be a little more patient and ful to confused nOObs. Because I have taken him and some of the others to task about their rudeness I am labelled a troll. Poor Bwian. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@spamcop.net> writes:
> Richard wrote: >> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: >> >>> Ivar Rosquist wrote: >>> >>> >>>> An utterly >>> Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups they >>> infest. >>> >> >> And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your >> own advice. Thank you. > > At least /one/ person has to tell the responder-to-spam not to do > it. its like shushing someone in a Library. No. They don't. it's nothing like that at all. Some of did not see the post until Mr "I own the group" decided to start net nannying. He made the original noise. if noone replies to that post then its one post and one only. Bwian's reply and bossy nature means it was then two minimum. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Richard wrote:
> Antoninus Twink <nospam@nospam.invalid> writes: (drivel) >> On 29 Jan 2008 at 18:25, Kenny McCormack wrote: (no idea and don't care) > Brian (I never knew a Bwian who wasn't as thick as two short planks and > boring with it), Oh look, three trolls hiding under a bridge. -- Mark McIntyre CLC FAQ <http://c-faq.com/> CLC readme: <http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt> |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Richard wrote:
> Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@spamcop.net> writes: > >> Richard wrote: >>> "Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes: >>> >>>> Ivar Rosquist wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> An utterly >>>> Please don't respond to obvious spam. They don't read the groups they >>>> infest. >>>> >>> And yet you add to the thread waking it up once more. Please take your >>> own advice. Thank you. >> At least /one/ person has to tell the responder-to-spam not to do >> it. its like shushing someone in a Library. > > No. They don't. it's nothing like that at all. Whatever. You're a troll and I clame my £5, -- Mark McIntyre CLC FAQ <http://c-faq.com/> CLC readme: <http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt> |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|