|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
hi fellow web developers!
I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer iframe. My concern is that if search engines can only read the body content on the body.html So... I want to write something for these body.htmls so that if the person clicks through a search engine link to go directly to the body.html page, they instead will be redirected to the main.html page - which contains the expected header, body.html, and footer iframes. is there a way to do this? Any ideas? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, trfilmographer@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page > that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer > iframe. > Any ideas? Don't use frames. Don't use iframes. -- In memoriam Alan J. Flavell http://www.alanflavell.org.uk/charset/ |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sep 8, 12:34pm, Andreas Prilop <prilop4...@trashmail.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, trfilmograp...@gmail.com wrote: > > I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page > > that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer > > iframe. > > Any ideas? > > Don't use frames. > Don't use iframes. > I didn't. Sadly I hired someone to redo my site that did. So now Im trying to make the best of the situation without redoing the entire site |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed adam.ornstein@gmail.com writing
in news:4d4b108a-1e8f-481f-adae- 666e0aa6feda@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com: > On Sep 8, 12:34pm, Andreas Prilop <prilop4...@trashmail.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, trfilmograp...@gmail.com wrote: >> > I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >> > that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >> > iframe. >> > Any ideas? >> >> Don't use frames. >> Don't use iframes. >> > > I didn't. Sadly I hired someone to redo my site that did. So now Im > trying to make the best of the situation without redoing the entire > site A redo isn't going to be that bad if you use includes and search and replace. -- Adrienne Boswell at Home Arbpen Web Site Design Services http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info Please respond to the group so others can share |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Andreas Prilop wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, trfilmographer@gmail.com wrote: > >> I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >> that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >> iframe. >> Any ideas? > > Don't use frames. > Don't use iframes. > Why not? I want to use a frame to display on the home page a half dozen text lines from a file that is generated automaticly, but I don't want to regenerate the home page so frequently. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed Rick Merrill
<rick0.merrill@gmail.com> writing in news:Y_ednVJ- qcbmCljVnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@comcast.com: > Andreas Prilop wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, trfilmographer@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >>> that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >>> iframe. >>> Any ideas? >> >> Don't use frames. >> Don't use iframes. >> > > Why not? I want to use a frame to display on the home page > a half dozen text lines from a file that is generated automaticly, > but I don't want to regenerate the home page so frequently. > Use a server side include. -- Adrienne Boswell at Home Arbpen Web Site Design Services http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info Please respond to the group so others can share |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
dorayme wrote:
> In article > <eec542b6-d259-4b3e-bbf8-089ea4962621@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, > trfilmographer@gmail.com wrote: > >> hi fellow web developers! >> >> I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >> that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >> iframe. My concern is that if search engines can only read the body >> content on the body.html >> >> So... I want to write something for these body.htmls so that if the >> person clicks through a search engine link to go directly to the >> body.html page, they instead will be redirected to the main.html page >> - which contains the expected header, body.html, and footer iframes. >> >> is there a way to do this? Any ideas? > > If you irresistibly want to use frames, read: > > <http://www.markparnell.com.au/articles/frames.php> Hmmm, "Separate frameset for every page One of the major problems with frames is that your visitors cannot bookmark a particular page on your site. They have to bookmark the home page, and then every time they come back, try and find their way through your menus to the page they actually want - if they can even remember which page it was." Eh? Won't that just defeat the only "virtue" of frames, by making you recreate all the "static" parts of the page? You might as well just do static, frameless pages. With SSI|PHP so ubiquitous and cheap there is very little need for frames. With the hopeful death of IE6 (and maybe 7 too) even less need for frames. BTW, where has Mark been these days... -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 8 Sep, 17:48, adam.ornst...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Don't use frames. > > Don't use iframes. > > I didn't. Sadly I hired someone to redo my site that did. So now Im > trying to make the best of the situation without redoing the entire > site Don't use frames. Don't use iframes. Don't use people who use frames. Redo. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
adam.ornstein@gmail.com writes:
> On Sep 8, 12:34pm, Andreas Prilop <prilop4...@trashmail.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, trfilmograp...@gmail.com wrote: >> > I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >> > that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >> > iframe. >> > Any ideas? >> >> Don't use frames. >> Don't use iframes. > > I didn't. Sadly I hired someone to redo my site that did. So now Im > trying to make the best of the situation without redoing the entire > site I hope you've at least withheld payment, and will be suing them for the cost of cleaning up his or her mess. Someone who claims to be a pro and charges for their work, should be held accountable when they deliver a shoddy product. You did have a contract, right? And the contract did specify that the work would be done according to standard best practices, right? sherm-- -- My blog: http://shermspace.blogspot.com Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html message <doraymeRidThis-
63C57F.08413609092008@web.aioe.org>, Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:41:36, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> posted: > >Make sure that if a search engine finds a frame all on its lonesome, >that frame has a device in it to alert the user to go to the frameset >page which is its true home. But the frameset page is not necessarily a sole true home. A site can be constructed to be workable entirely without frames, including the entry page, but to allow adding of frames for those (probably with large screens) who want them. Example : <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/frames-4.htm?dm034-24.htm> -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links. Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036) Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036) |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
dorayme wrote:
> In article > <eec542b6-d259-4b3e-bbf8-089ea4962621@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, > trfilmographer@gmail.com wrote: > >> hi fellow web developers! >> >> I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >> that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >> iframe. My concern is that if search engines can only read the body >> content on the body.html >> >> So... I want to write something for these body.htmls so that if the >> person clicks through a search engine link to go directly to the >> body.html page, they instead will be redirected to the main.html page >> - which contains the expected header, body.html, and footer iframes. >> >> is there a way to do this? Any ideas? > > If you irresistibly want to use frames, read: > > <http://www.markparnell.com.au/articles/frames.php> Yes, I still want to use frame because I do not want the content indexed/googled and it will not display a bookmarkable URL. > Make sure that if a search engine finds a frame all on its lonesome, > that frame has a device in it to alert the user to go to the frameset > page which is its true home. > > You would be surprised to know how many lost frames can turn up on the > internet. I run a small not-for-profit agency that takes them in and we > look for their siblings and proper home and try as best as we can to > reunite them all. Many of them are in extremely depressed states. sad. > > But there are some frames that are perfectly happy - we don't take these > in - because they were "only-children". That is, they never really > needed to be in a frameset in the first place. > > Anyway, if you find any of this advice ful, you might like toshow > your appreciation by donating to the refuge I run. $US only please. > |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
dorayme wrote:
> In article > <eec542b6-d259-4b3e-bbf8-089ea4962621@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, > trfilmographer@gmail.com wrote: > >> hi fellow web developers! >> >> I have a bit of a concern. I developed a main page that is a page >> that contains 3 iframes - a header iframe, a body iframe, and a footer >> iframe. My concern is that if search engines can only read the body >> content on the body.html >> >> So... I want to write something for these body.htmls so that if the >> person clicks through a search engine link to go directly to the >> body.html page, they instead will be redirected to the main.html page >> - which contains the expected header, body.html, and footer iframes. >> >> is there a way to do this? Any ideas? > > If you irresistibly want to use frames, read: > > <http://www.markparnell.com.au/articles/frames.php> Yes, I still want to use frame because I do not want the content indexed/googled and it will not display a bookmarkable URL. > Make sure that if a search engine finds a frame all on its lonesome, > that frame has a device in it to alert the user to go to the frameset > page which is its true home. > > You would be surprised to know how many lost frames can turn up on the > internet. I run a small not-for-profit agency that takes them in and we > look for their siblings and proper home and try as best as we can to > reunite them all. Many of them are in extremely depressed states. sad. > > But there are some frames that are perfectly happy - we don't take these > in - because they were "only-children". That is, they never really > needed to be in a frameset in the first place. > > Anyway, if you find any of this advice ful, you might like toshow > your appreciation by donating to the refuge I run. $US only please. > |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> I didn't. Sadly I hired someone
Frames are bad for search engines for one. Better to use server-side includes or some server side language. -- best regards Thomas Schulz :: A1 Sitemap Generator http://www.micro-sys.dk/products/sitemap-generator/ |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|